>>97893597
Traditional games?

>>97893597
>Anon shouting at clouds
Filler thread

>>97893597
>I'm not mad
That's what mad people would say.

>>97893597

True. It is amusing how many settings are "medieval" when in reality most are renaissance or early modern just without guns. I guess people aren't that familiar with feudal structures and it is difficult to wrap one's mind to a pre-modern state era, when things were messier or done very differently.

>>97893597
Who are you quoting, and whoever it was, did he actually call his setting medieval or did you just decide on your own that it was trying and failing to be medieval? In my experience, the latter is pretty common when people around here complain about "medieval" settings.

>>97893597
I've hardly seen anyone describe their own setting as "medieval".

>>97893597
I just call my works fantasy, because they're a product of imagining things that are impossible and improbable, whether it's futuristic, in space, cyberspace, or otherwise.
It just makes things easier, because that's what fantasy means. I don't care what people who wanted to seem different in a saturated book market want to call it, nor do I care what the mindless sheep taken in by their grift call it.

>>97893597
>>97893630
This is because people think D&D is a historically-grounded medieval setting, just with fantasy elements.

>>97893597
>and is completely generated
... what?

>>97893597
I don't use unfamiliar settings when playing with Americans.

>>97894280
>This is because people think D&D is a historically-grounded medieval setting, just with fantasy elements.
I'm sure someone thinks that. I don't think that very many people do, though.

>>97894392
It used to try harder to be more grounded, but that doesn't count for much. "Chainmail" was probably the most grounded of all of them, if you count that as a sort of "D&D 0e" or a prototype.

>>97894280
>This is because people think D&D is a historically-grounded medieval setting, just with fantasy elements.
I'm sure someone thinks that. I don't think that very many people do, though.

>>97893732
I have, but not since the 90's.

you say this OP, but some anon is desperately stopping himself from writing a 10-post essay about how your very use of the term 'medieval' is incorrect.

>>97893597
>>97893630
Your unwarranted elitism is pointless. If a setting has swords and horses and kings and knights, it's medieval. It's useful to call it that because 99% of people will instantly understand what you mean from that one word.

>>97894280
>>97894410
Nigger, there were androids and t-rex in the LBB.

>>97894521
>but some anon is desperately stopping himself from writing a 10-post essay about how your very use of the term 'medieval' is incorrect.
This is the hero /tg/ needs.

>>97894521
>>97894734
i m sure if one spends a little time in the archive he will finds countless such posts. After all we used to have a very autistic arms and armors general for years before the rona

>>97894691
What do you think "doesn't count for much" means, you drooling retard?

>>97894734
We don't need any more off-topic /his/ posting, we need more games.

>>97894691
Hey, drooling retard, what do you suppose "doesn't count for much" means?

File: IMG_5740.jpg (885.9 KB)

885.9 KB JPG

>>97893597
>watch unicorn documantation
>Lady and the Unicorn wall tapestri is shown
Funny how i know this picture.

>>97896192
https://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/85449955

>>97893732

I do, but I know a lot of old fossils.