>>219795775
They're not dinosaurs, they are monsters.
It was stated since the first movie.

>>219795775
What even is a "scientifically accurate" t-rex?

>>219795836
Not OP becauae we found T-rex skin and it was reptilian

>>219795836
>large lips entirely covering teeth
>mostly covered in colorful feathers
>doesn't hunt for food, but is a docile scavenger
>not as large as originally thought, Spinosaurus was actually considerably larger
>doesn't roar, but coo like modern birds

>>219795980
feathers don't fossilize

>>219796034
>They were all gay and adopted rocks to hatch

>>219795775
Paleontology is almost a meme science

File: spinosaurus-evolutions-over-the-years-v0-57vg302vubdf1.jpg (126.4 KB)

126.4 KB JPG

>>219796034
>ACK

>>219795775
>4 renditions of t-rex in op
>not a singular one is scientifically accurate

>>219796034
Literally all of that is wrong.

>>219796047
skin impressions do, including those with feathers, and every t-rex skin impression shows scaly, featherless skin.

Land animals don't have feathers, God didn't make them that way

>>219796350
trex scales were tough, hence the lack of imprint, you only see feather imprints on relatively small beasts with softer skin

>>219796244
based ankylo fighting dirty in the streets

File: jurassic park.jpg (57.7 KB)

57.7 KB JPG

>>219795775

>>219796379
You're just making shit up. I've never seen a single paper or paleontologist suggest anything like that.

File: Prehistoric Planet (2022).jpg (99.8 KB)

99.8 KB JPG

The "le scientifically accurate feather" faggotry was unironically deboonked and leftroons have been coping for years.

>>219796034
>Spinosaurus was actually considerably larger
Modern paleocucks built their whole identity on hating Spinosaur though

>scalefags want me to believe >>219796711 looks more vicious than >>219795775

wouldn't they just edit out the genes that make them grow feathers? just to fit public perception of how dinosaurs look? it's a theme part, not a science experiment

>>219796711
You're still posting leftroon cope, though.
>o-okay, there's no evidence of T. rex having a coat of feathers... B-BUT that doesn't mean it didn't have small hair-like feathers, chud!

>>219795775
Your Mother has been real busy.

File: ALLO OOF.png (428.7 KB)

428.7 KB PNG

>>219796244

File: 1770150745047484.jpg (87.5 KB)

87.5 KB JPG

>>219795775

>>219796034
So you basically want a Faggosaurus Cocks

File: 1737587344930579.png (666.5 KB)

666.5 KB PNG

>>219797376
>this shit again

File: 4653-473d957023ec.jpg (355.7 KB)

355.7 KB JPG

>>219797493
>conveniently conceals the rest of the body

File: dominion historical t rex.jpg (197.5 KB)

197.5 KB JPG

>>219795775
Jurassic World Dominion has the opening scene set 65 million years ago, which features a T. rex with a downy hairlike feather covering.

Though the scene negates any credit it could have gotten for having a more accurate T. rex by also including Giganotosaurus there, a dino which lived 30 million years before T. rex and on another continent and never would have met it

>>219796711
Why are these T. rexes so fat?

>>219795775
Those are not scientifically accurate. See Jurassic park 1 for scientifically accurate dinosaurs.

File: skinny.jpg (123.6 KB)

123.6 KB JPG

>>219797536
You were saying?

File: Dilophosaurus-jurassic-park-01[1].jpg (351.6 KB)

351.6 KB JPG

>>219797629
Almost everything about the dilophosaurus was fake and made up for the movie- while portraying its features as scientific discoveries they made through cloning it, which makes it even worse

>>219797830
I can't stand people that say Jurassic Park was "accurate for the time" when it clearly wasn't, especially when they try to argue that it should be accurate now.

How long are people going to have this exact same conversation for?

>>219797245
>Be allosaurus
>Die in an embarrassing way by getting spiked in the dick
>Millions of years later descendants of the furry faggot mammals you used to hunt and terrorise draw depictions of your death and laugh about it

>>219797931
Probably for as long as the Jurassic franchise continues, and keeps associating fake monsters with dinosaurs in the public consciousness. Which isn't gonna stop any time soon

>>219798007
People like to be entertained, anon, and they like cool looking animals.
It'll only change when paleontology decides to stop being cringe and paleodocs stop trying to be performatively speculative for brownie points from tasteless faggots on Reddit.

File: d rex.png (632.6 KB)

632.6 KB PNG

>>219798073
No one likes the cloverfield rancor in the last movie. Are you saying they should go ahead and do more of this shit?

>>219798265
No. That's a whole new sentence.

>>219796034
>lips entirely covering teeth
Fair, the enamel of their teeth would need hydration from their saliva
>mostly covered in colorful feathers
Not true, skin prints of T-rex suggest that they were entirely scaled with no feathers whatsover.
>doesn't hunt for food, but is a docile scavenger
No true. Multiple skeletons show wounds from fights with herbavores and their fossilized dung and stomach contents suggest they hunted prey, not scavenged.
>not as large as originally thought, Spinosaurus was actually considerably larger
T-rex was actually kind of undersized because of the amount of juvenile specimans discovered. Yes Spinosaurus was larger but it was also mostly aquatic.
>doesn't roar, but coo like modern birds
We have no way of knowing how any extinct animal sounded. This is just ludicrous speculation.

Congrats 1 out of 5 points correct. You fail. Go back to your trey the explainer videos you midwit.

>>219795775
Muh scientifically accurate dinosaurs is just the secular version of muh biblically accurate angels and I'm never going to pretend it's not.

File: cbc dinosaur coo.png (705.4 KB)

705.4 KB PNG

>>219796034
>>219798353
The "maybe dinosaurs actually cooed" story is the dumbest thing because it doesn't account for how diverse dinosaurs were. How they dominated the earth for ~130 million years and came in all shapes and sizes.
Saying they all made the same types of sounds is like an alien saying all mammals on earth right now sound the same

>>219796503
based asian dabbing on the white man

>>219797493
Is there any other animal this works for? I only ever see that one.

The Tyrannosaurus in Jurassic Park was specifically designed to not be scientifically accurate (longer legs for one), so that the design could be copyrighted.

People just copied it anyway.

File: diego-alessio-skulls-reptile[1].jpg (509.2 KB)

509.2 KB JPG

>>219798656
Lizards, snakes.
Reptiles in general don't have much in the way of fleshy cartilaginous additions or protuberances on top of their skulls

>>219798656
Snakes, but that's probably too easy.

File: 1576176622189.jpg (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB JPG

>>219798768
>>219798773
based

File: 1682979305215283.webm (3.9 MB)

3.9 MB WEBM

>>219795775
This thread is filled with midwits who don't know that the T-Rex liked to gather vegan animal skins in order to hold dinosaur drag queen shows.

File: 1747933939385482.jpg (72.5 KB)

72.5 KB JPG

>>219798656
Even some birds, like vultures.

File: 1512759832973.jpg (633.8 KB)

633.8 KB JPG

>>219797493

Ok explain Gooseasaurus

File: 1497718015517.jpg (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB JPG

>>219798918

>>219798909
This isn't really any worse than what was done with the anthropomorphic dinos for little kids in We're Back! or The Land Before Time etc.
It's just a modern take on roughly the same thing

File: paleofag.png (247.2 KB)

247.2 KB PNG

>>219798991
This you?

>>219798991
NOOOOOOOO this kid's cartoon affects me personally!!!

chuds will have a huge meltdown once we crack AGI and it figures out all dinos were oversized birbs, just as lame as their pleistocene descendants

File: get fucked.jpg (138.4 KB)

138.4 KB JPG

>>219799030
Based. Nothing gets me harder than blowing the fuck out of the scalies as science progressively shows the world more and more of what the dinosaurs were really like. Once the deconstruction of the dinosaur's image is complete and nobody ever takes those shits seriously, we humans can finally say we mammals are the only true masters of the Earth.

File: humboldt-brachiosaurus[1].jpg (772 KB)

772 KB JPG

>>219799030
The AGI would be lying to you if it said that.
There's no plausible way to take all our fossils of giant brachiosaurs or titanosaurs etc and interpret them as actually birdlike creatures

>>219795775
>>219796711
Evolution is just a theory.

>>219799226
the obvious bird skelly in your pic says otherwise

>>219795775
>Enough. I won't hear any more of this hebrew nonsense.

>>219797875
One of the points made in the book was that the animals were not accurate because so much of the missing dna was just stitched together with other things like a frankenstein. The animals would often die for unexplained reasons or have weird skin sensitivities or fungal infections. The geneticist even tried to convince the old man to let him alter the dinosaurs to be less aggressive and he refused, wanting them to be the real thing. The geneticist argued that they already were not the real thing.

File: Ozempic.jpg (332.9 KB)

332.9 KB JPG

>>219795775
>Trying to make dinosaurs lame and gay

>>219799321
Evolution is a fact and easily observable in a lab, with organisms that have short enough lifespans

>>219800244
Don't bother, this guy reposts his ritualistic message in every single dinosaur thread.

>>219797608
and looks nothing like a Giganotosaurus

>>219796034
>mostly covered in colorful feathers
T-rex had scaly skin, you're getting your "science" from deviant art

File: suicidal penguin.webm (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB WEBM

>birds can't hurt y-ACK

>>219796715
And even then Giganotosaurus was bigger but also gets hate because muh t-rex childhood memories

File: 1737412238535817.png (350.2 KB)

350.2 KB PNG

Dinosaurs were actually demons.

>>219800435
Demons for who, when there were no people around? Isn't the whole point of a demon to torment others?

File: 1669995248910.webm (2.9 MB)

2.9 MB WEBM

>cassowaries are 4-5 feet tall and weigh 100-150lbs
>they make sounds like this https://youtu.be/iy-9Z2KrjsY
>they can disembowel you with their feet
Now imagine one that was 40 feet long, 14 feet tall at the hips, and weighed 18000 pounds.

File: 1771890942176.png (212 KB)

212 KB PNG

>>219800633

feather dinosaurs is woke

>>219800511
Do demons have a point?
I intend no blasphemy but what exactly are demons? Angels kicked out of heaven, right? Or is there not a consensus?

It seems if angels were kicked out of heaven with no one to torment, they would still exist.

>>219800760
Is it woke for modern birds to also have feathers?
If not, how do you reconcile that with where they got the feathers from?

File: 1770218092377036.webm (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB WEBM

>this upsets the balding chuds

File: 1748013860203022.jpg (186.3 KB)

186.3 KB JPG

>>219797493

>>219799030
We will never have AGI nor will we ever have ASI.

>>219799321
Evolution. Bacteria have short enough lifespans that you can literally see them evolve in real time with a microscope.

>>219798735
Not only that but the Jurassic films actually explain in-universe that the reason why the cloned dinosaurs aren't scientifically accurate is because frog DNA was used to fill in the gaps of the gene sequences of the cloned dinosaurs.

>>219799093
Based mammal supremacist.

>>219801237
* Evolution is a fact.

>>219796034
>doesn't roar, but coo like modern birds

What does an 8-ton bird cooing sound like?

>>219796034
If a crocodile doesnt coo, why would a T Rex?

File: 58ee3748227c7.jpg (93.7 KB)

93.7 KB JPG

>>219802987
Because they exist on an entirely different line.

>>219795775
>t-rex
It's all fiction. Hence a Spielberg movie to capture your imagination.

>>219798265
They overdid it with them Kuato arms. Bulbous head has a similar effect but not as noticeable. In both cases - a hat on a hat.

>>219800760
I hate wokery as much as the next guy, but in what way are feathered dinosaurs woke?

>>219801147
>tranny flag-colored feathers
Bravo.

File: Archaeopteryx_lithographica_(Berlin_specimen)[1].jpg (3.2 MB)

3.2 MB JPG

>>219804648
Some of them claim feathered dinosaurs are a form of Chinese propaganda, because several of the more prominent feathered dinosaurs are from in/around China and Mongolia. China is creating the flamboyant colorful imagery to turn the kids in the West trans... or something.
It's a lazy misconception for anyone to think they are exclusively Chinese though. Dino fossils with feather imprints have been found on every continent, such as picrel from Germany

>>219806271
You're intentionally downplaying how convenient it is they've been discovering feathered fossils at 5x the rate of western countries since 1996 when they finally decided to get some skin in the game after Jurassic Park started to get more money flowing into paleontology and pretending people are the weird ones for noticing.
For what reason, I don't know, but don't act like it isn't suspicious, especially since they've been involved in scandals in fossil market fraud before and have a historical complex of trying to look better than everyone else.

>>219795836
A giant chicken. So fucking terrifying.

>>219796711
Cute looking big doggos

>>219795775
That is a huge bird.

>>219797608
Is it watchable? I think I only watched the first JW

>>219806831
The alleged reason, is due to how the bodies were preserved when they died in the area.

>>219796503
if the dinosaurs in jurassic park aren't supposed to be realistic in universe, how come they showed a 6' velociraptor skeleton at the beginning?

File: Paleontologists16042026230643.jpg (86 KB)

86 KB JPG

>>219797376

File: velociraptor-or-swift-thief-is-a-genus-of-small-dromaeosaurid-dinosaur-that-lived-during-the-late-cretaceo...-long-narrow-skulls-with-upturned-snouts-and-a-hook-shaped-claw-on-each-hindfoot-which-was-used-for-capturing-prey-2SCWFWA.jpg (83.4 KB)

83.4 KB JPG

>>219807138
6 foot TALL velociraptors isn't very realistic

>>219807138
Velociraptor in JP is supposed to be V. antirrhopus, not V. mongoliensis, antirrhopus being just another name for Deinonychus.
That said, it's still oversized. The idea is that the pulpy, sleeker style of JP dinosaurs are supposed to be "accurate" to that universe, just like it's "accurate" that there's just killer, oversized berserker sharks in the Jaws universe, so the size and basic shape is true, but it's also true that what they cloned are approximations of what they're supposed to be, not actually the real thing.

>>219797875
>Jurassic Park was "accurate for the time"
It was though.
That time - 1989, when the book was being written.

>>219807227
No, it wasn't, not in the novel or the movie.
Go look up a description of what the novel T. rex looks looks like and what kind of features it has.

>>219807212
and yet real velociraptors are canonically 6" tall in jurassic park
"they're cloned from frogs so they don't have to be realistic" is only ever used as a justification for changing sex

>>219807082
Watchable? Uhhhh... it's not the worst movie you've ever seen. It's a weird one in how the plot has almost nothing to do with dinosaurs, it's actually about an agriculture conspiracy, and the dinosaurs are only there as excuses for action to happen

For context, you should read or watch a summary of the previous one, Fallen Kingdom. Which is such a piece of shit I can't recommend it, but the ending matters for what comes after it

>>219807227
it was not, the dilophasaurus presented in the book and movie was never even close to realistic.

File: opabinia_spurdo_fug.jpg (79.7 KB)

79.7 KB JPG

>>219807127
Correct, geology in one location can preserve delicate fossils better than others.
Like how the Burgess shale creatures only being found in one location in Canada doesn't mean they're all fake, or that somehow only one little spot in the ocean had diverse life back then. No, it's a glimpse of things that were more widely distributed but weren't preserved anywhere else that we know of

What were the monkeys of the dino world?

>>219808297
Birds. They still are.

>>219795811
They were (in the novel) authentic in all essential detail like based Hammond wanted, it was soicuck Wu who wanted to make them slow and ugly and anti-woke like in movies but Hammond told him to shut the fuck up, so it's only accurate to add feathers to them. The mongs behind the movie couldn't even get the vision based movement thing right (it was caused by the amphibian DNA so why the fuck would Grant know it out of nowhere)

>>219808379
That whole back and forth was about how they moved faster than expected, feathertard.
They still look and act like a bunch of reptilian monsters.

File: new-details-of-tully-monster-revealed-l[1].jpg (111.4 KB)

111.4 KB JPG

>teleports behind you

File: Realistic_JP.jpg (176.9 KB)

176.9 KB JPG

>>219795775

File: 2dv2ol9kc7hc1.jpg (82.5 KB)

82.5 KB JPG

>>219795775
>OP forgot this scene
Can't you people at least watch the movies you discuss?

>>219797245
STEGOSAURUS PREE

File: dino evolution.png (148.1 KB)

148.1 KB PNG

>>219795775

>>219796711
This show was great

File: HEo0E3GW8AAC3Jj.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

>>219795775
Nice bait. In reality, it's pretty close. The arms have the wrong posture and the JP rex is a little more gaunt than the latest reconstructions, and they may or may not have had lips, but other than that it's perfectly serviceable

>>219807256
also the t.rex vision defect, in the book at least.

>>219810191
It’s the cure for insomnia.

>>219798265
Someone approved of this thing, and its still on shelves

>>219799012
So we should only care about what personally affects us? Well women being property, niggers being enslaved and faggots being executed, none of that personally affects me so I shouldn't care about any of it.

>>219796798
>B-BUT that doesn't mean it didn't have small hair-like feathers, chud!
that's predicted by phylogenetic bracketing, and the skin impressions we have do not in any way suggest a different hypothesis

>>219806831
>how convenient it is they've been discovering feathered fossils at 5x the rate of western countries
literally 100% only and exclusively because of their lower cretaceous fossil formation which represent forested environments affected by heavy volcanic activity, which produces fine sediment perfectly suited for feather preservation.
But you already knew that, because you're that retarded paleoschizo. So you'll just claim it's all a big conspiracy by the deep state or something

>>219810286
the legs are also kind of weird looking in the JP rex

>>219796244
>WOWEE ZOWIE I EVOLVED FROM THE SEA FOR THIS??

>>219813037
More like it's predicted by coping featherfags that can't handle the truth that T. rex didn't have feathers.
Nobody should be giving them any sort of consolation for losing after a decade of smugly trying to rub it in everyone's faces.

>>219813127
I don't know who your poopdickschizo is but it sounds like another case of someone making people like you have a melty for suggesting you could be wrong.

>>219813166
>decade of smugly trying to rub it in everyone's faces.
Anon, it's time to let Trey The Explainer go. I don't know where he touched you inappropriately, but you shouldn't base your paleontological ideas on how much you detest him. He was never relevant

File: 654646464.jpg (32.6 KB)

32.6 KB JPG

Pfft. Everyone knows, we nailed the most accurate T-Rex long ago.

>trace amounts of protein survive in dinosaur fossils
>Protein is examined by biologists, is nearly a perfect "middle point" between the proteins found in bird meat and the proteins found in crocodile meat
>Birds have no lips
>Crocodiles have no lips
>Paleoartists insist on drawing lips and making the dinos pink or whatever the fuck
Why are they like this? Actual science keeps confirming that dinosaurs were badass crocobird monsters.

>>219798265
This shithead doesn’t even do anything in the new movie.

>>219813565
I don't even know who that is, I'm talking about retards like OP who've been doing this for years.

>>219814613
OP is literally just ragebaiting for (You)s... I shouldn't be surprised you couldn't figure it out, considering how retarded you are unless you're just pretending to be both OP and their opposition, to elicit discourse

>>219814727
Mindbroken.

File: 8114LzwD5UL._AC_SL1500_.jpg (236.9 KB)

236.9 KB JPG

>>219797830
>>219797875
>>219799933
>>219807227
>>219807266
The point of the Dilophosaurus specifically was to show that the people creating the dinosaurs were going in blind and had no way of fully preparing for what they would get, "Check it out we're gonna make a cool Dilophosaurus, oh shit it has a frill and spits blinding venom into your eyes."
Crichton always went out of his way to thoroughly research whatever he was writing for the sake of scientific accuracy, but accuracy wasn't the point of Jurassic Park, JP at it's core is about man's hubris turning around and fucking him right in the ass.

What does piss me off though is that every single Dilo toy has a frill now because dipshit Chinese toy makers keep ripping off Jurassic Park.

>>219795775
they're mixed with frog dna
not 100% dino

>>219801322
If the gravitational pull was weaker then it wouldn't have weighed 8 tons

>>219815312
>Frog DNA
So...they drank wine ate cheese and surrendered at the sight of another Dino? That'd make for a massively boring amusement park...

>>219795775
Iirc first t rex was accurate for the time.

File: Screenshot_20260101_190223_Brave.jpg (292.3 KB)

292.3 KB JPG

>>219796034
>>mostly covered in colorful feathers
>>doesn't hunt for food, but is a docile scavenger
>>not as large as originally thought, Spinosaurus was actually considerably larger
Deboonked
go back to r*ddit.

>>219798435
You mean based.

>>219806271
China is trad and natsoc and antisemitic tho

>>219807127
Yes, it's kind of spooky if you look it up. A lot of dinos there got preserved similarly to how the people of Pompeii did where it created an outer layer.

>>219807082
Modern movies are both worse and more watchable than old movies, but the last movie of the jurassic world trilogy is the least watchable in the series.

>>219810191
It's incredibly blurry. It's not just cinemaslop but also documentaries made entirely in cgi that does this shit. Why is it so blurry, why are the producers such retarded idiots?

File: dumb.jpg (59.4 KB)

59.4 KB JPG

>>219795775
What dinos looked like is highly speculative.
There is no "correct" version.
There are lots of different artistic interpretations trying to imagine the possibilities, and the version you learned as a kid is just as speculative as the others.
We have very little hard information to go on.

File: image_11033e-Tyrannosaurus-rex.jpg (182 KB)

182 KB JPG

>>219796034
>large lips entirely covering teeth
Likely.
>mostly covered in colorful feathers
Young were probably coated with fur like feathers, and probably shed them fast.
>doesn't hunt for food, but is a docile scavenger
It was probably both a hunter and a scavenger. When you get so big it's easy to steal catches from smaller preadators.
>not as large as originally thought, Spinosaurus was actually considerably larger
Longer, not larger, the T-Rex was without a doubt the heaviest giant theropod.
>doesn't roar, but coo like modern birds
More like make crodocile noises, roaring is definitely very unlikely.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-toMxIfauQ&

>>219799030
They would only be oversized in comparison to modern birds, but relative to the other creatures and flora of the time they were similar in scale to the birds of today. Possibly.

>>219798353
>T-rex was actually kind of undersized because of the amount of juvenile specimans discovered. Yes Spinosaurus was larger but it was also mostly aquatic.
We have far less spinosaurus material than TRex.

>>219797954
>Mammals were a mistake

File: 1737768778419525.png (568.6 KB)

568.6 KB PNG

>>219818624
You sure?

File: 1757127478535991.jpg (258.1 KB)

258.1 KB JPG

>look at me, I'm a dinosaur

>>219821592
So how come we don't find any dinosaurs with weird feet like this?

>>219817599
But you know that chickens also have scales - on their legs.
If some retard like you would find fossilized chicken leg in the future, he could claim that chickens were all covered in scales.

File: 1770865665581.jpg (2.6 MB)

2.6 MB JPG

Uhm... sisters?

I just got done dilating and grooming 14 year olds on discord (as all valid feather sisters such as myself do) and I saw... this...

I literally started crying. WHERE. ARE. THE. FUCKING. FEATHERS???

seriously, how do we respond?

>>219822508
Where are the feathers ?
> inb4 aackackqckchwhaly not all dinosaurs have feathers
Ok faggots did they or did they not have feathers don’t come here with this whatsbowism horseshit

>>219822508
Nobody claimed that type of dinosaur ever had feathers.

>>219822508
This is as retarded as saying dolphins exist, so why are all the other mammals non-aquatic and with fur/hair?

>>219801147
>Vegan Tranny T-Rex
Interestingly, 41% of T-Rexes died out *before* the K-T Extinction Event.

>>219795811
Not monsters but that missing fragments of their DNA were completed with lil frogs and reptile DNA. Also they are all female so we know where you stand now chud.

>>219823114
Why didn't they use birds or crocodiles? They're way closer genetically to dinosaurs than frogs.