>>219820573
I think the box office numbers for this movie are lies, nobody watched this shit.

>>219820573
They were making shit like this in the silent era, your little social commentary isn't as poignant as you think.

>>219820614
In the silent era there was no concept of PC you could say whatever you wanted, obviously the standards are different now, the funny thing is just what conditions under which people excuse their standards

>dakota johnson
Am i the only one who finds her ugly? she looks like her pussy stinks really bad

>>219820671
>you could say whatever you wanted in the silent era
No, you couldn't because obscenity laws were much stricter back then. Wanna try this again with an approach that's a little less uneducated and retarded?

>>219820573
Nice thumbnail dumbass phone poster.

>>219820732
>obscenity laws were much stricter back then
Maybe if you're talking about post-Hays code, but the silent era covered the pre-Hays code era almost entirely
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Code_Hollywood
Literal brain-dead people on this site

>>219820750
Phone posters are out getting pussy while you are in your basement desktop computer chamber

>>219820833
>Maybe if you're talking about post-Hays code
No I'm talking about the strict obscenity laws the entire country adhered to you fucking mouthbreathing ape. Even your trolling is ineffectual, you have nothing going for you at all.

>>219820953
In the 1920s there was no sort of "social politeness" where you couldn't say things that offended protected groups, while that exists as the standard barrier to discourse today. I'm referring to even post-Hays vs today.

You could obviously shit on women for being scheming harlots, black people for whatever, etc all the way up until 1960 and there would be no issue. Now of course there is the veil of enforced political correctness which makes that harder. To insist that that existed to the same degree back then because they had "obscenity laws" implies a one-dimension understanding of cultural development, which is not unusual for someone who gets riled up over a comment on an anonymous forum.

>>219820573
holy shit how many women are responding to this thread kek. op isn't wrong, and you're all fags.