Thread #737118321
File: 1776422566325843(1).jpg (86.1 KB)
86.1 KB JPG
You Stop Killing Games chuds just killed videogames. Are you happy now?
522 RepliesView Thread
>>
File: jocko.jpg (27.2 KB)
27.2 KB JPG
>>737118321
Good.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1761900340647087.gif (305.9 KB)
305.9 KB GIF
>>737118321
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: ross - comments47.jpg (200.5 KB)
200.5 KB JPG
>>737118484
For them, corporations > anything else.
>>
File: 1729638718586258.png (205.3 KB)
205.3 KB PNG
>>737118321
In a perfect world the EU goes overboard and kills every single MMO/GaaS/Gacha/<Insert always online slop here>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: SKG99.jpg (161.4 KB)
161.4 KB JPG
>>737119672
Depends on the person I guess. Some are already integrated into the system and will defend it. Others seem to want to be part of the "winning team" and expect their online defense to be rewarded:
>If I defend microsoft a lot, they'll realize I'm valuable!
>>
>>
>>
>>737119569
That's not how it works
The deal was so that every online only game going forward has to oblige to these rules not that it works retroactively
They're not gonna shut down a crap ton of live service games in the last minute because they can just keep them on and then shut down if they feel like it because Stop Killing Games doesn't work like that
>>
File: 1626973417220.png (2 MB)
2 MB PNG
>>737119510
>>737118484
Brain parasites.
>>
>>
>>737118321
The most likely outcome is EU requiring a subscription service to play online games, so we'll all be paying to use multiplayer on steam.
Which honestly is pretty fair, xbox, playstation, and nintendo all have to pay for online, why shouldn't pc players too? I'm all for an equitable, diverse, and inclusive future, and what's $50 dollars a month to play the games we all love?
>>
>>
>>737118321
I'm assuming SKG negatively impacts gacha companies and so they have unleashed their finest specimens to defend them. That's the only charitable explanation for the IQ and behavior of the anti SKG coalition.
>>
>>
>>737118484
Look this might be new information, but this is what a bluepill is. I live with several of them. They trust the system and, in my mother's own words, want the TV to tell them what to think. If TV says to play Game IV because Game III is being shut down then she must go out and buy Game IV. I won't lie, I personally exploited this growing up to get more games. But I now see the true greedy intent behind it.
These people are so hopelessly dependent on the system they will fight to maintain it. External agents can infiltrate them and fill them with ideas that are not their own, regardless of how stupid or farcical they are, and they will repeat it and act on it because the TV told them to. Bluepills trust the system, TV, and authority figures over their own eyes and ears. Bluepills cannot and do not want to think for themselves. Bluepills require the larger network to be plugged into as they are not capable of existing outside that network.
>>
They’re literally begging the government to tax video games and players annually
Total fucking retard losers
Back in my day you ran a private server or paid a dev to decompile something. Fuck these fucking retards they should be shot
>>
>>
>>
>>737119998
There's always that"but" and a whole lot of what-if scenarios and other bullshit, trying to say that curing cancer is actually bad you see because the cure might make your stomach upset.
Someone has to take the first step towards the right direction, it doesn't have to be a 100% success on the first try. And I believe Ross even said this himself as well, they are not demanding a specific solution but want any solution
>>
>>737120270
>Gacha literally cannot exist an offline environment
Enter: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2183650/MEGA_MAN_X_DiVE_Offline/
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1757108819120.png (582.8 KB)
582.8 KB PNG
>>737118321
Insane how no matter what the situation is, theres always one bootlicker willing to defend the poor little billionaire corporation
>>
>>
>>
>>737120489
>>737120429
>>737120393
This same spam gets posted in every thread when the bootlicking trannies start losing
>>
File: 1776441161272.png (182.5 KB)
182.5 KB PNG
This dude is unconsciously making a point for SKG.
Games from 30 years ago like Quake Live, CS, Age of Empires 2 and whatnot are still playable because of private, self hosted servers. And they will be playable until humanity dies over. They already work, there's no need to change them. SKG is aimed towards new games that are rendered completely unplayable once a company kills them off.
>>
I have yet to see an example of a A or AA multiplayer game that would've been affected by this initiative.
All the examples I've seen so far are games from publishers who have more than enough to support an undertaking like this so that said, can someone please give me a good example so that I can finally understand why this might be a bad idea after all?
This is all just an exercise and hypothetical ofc, we have to remember this initiative is not supposed to apply retroactively in the first place.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737120393
It's always an underage retard or a shill for the companies
>SKG WILL FORCE DEVS TO KEEP GAMES OFFLINE FOREVER!
No retard. All SKG wants is the materials necessary to keep the game offline for the player base without having to spend years reverse engineering or praying some autistic programmer does it for them
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737120701
2bad. Evil companies and goycattle consumers left everyone else no other option. Only (You) can prevent forest fires and you all shrugged your shoulders instead. Whatever negative consequences come from this are on everyone, not solely SKG.
>>
>>
>>
>>737120701
I don't disagree anon, on principle I too dislike the idea of governments controlling everyone and everything but the reality is if the government hadn't put a leash on corpos and society in general we would still have kids smoking and drinking and the population in general would still be mostly composed of analfabet retards. Even more than now.
So I'm conflicted honestly. On one hand I don't want the government to have a say in my decisions because I know I can be better than that but on the other we as a society would be doomed otherwise...
Overall I'm still trending more to the side of this initiative being good. Gaming publishers need someone to reign in on their bullshit and if it ain't the customers because they're too dumb then the government it is I guess...
>>
File: 1775075781956565.gif (3 MB)
3 MB GIF
>>737118321
>Are you happy now?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737121183
>>737121176
>>737121138
>>737121092
His name is ferretfucker, get it through your thick skulls
>>
>>737121270
>>737121183
>>737121138
You trannies really hate this guy
What exactly did he do, explain biology?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737121138
>>737121183
Kek, my bad, I only learned of SKG a week ago.
>>
>>737121328
he was being a fucking faggot and most of all wrong, and instead of saying my bad, he just doubled down and became even more of a cunt.
But then again, his vocal opposition towards SKG probably gave it the traction it needed to succeed.
And it will succeed, no amount of corpo shills crying will change that
>>
>>
>>
>>737121080
You seem to be grappling with the notion that having a good society necessitates some amount of authoritarian curbing on personal liberty, maybe proportionately to the size or complexity of the society. It is inevitable that a non-zero amount of people will demand their right to abuse and mistreat others unprovoked is an expression of their God-given rights, and it should be obvious what anarchy that inevitably results in if respected. An absolutist approach to freedom is for life outside society.
>>
>>
>>737121228
It doesn't affect me as I've already given up on the present and future gaming industry. I think buying games is sinful. I now only want to rape these companies to death and if consumers refuse, decade after decade, then that leaves the bureaucrats.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737121328
>guy who worked as QA underling for blizzard only because his dad was an exec
>was shit at his job, constantly late and would sperg out in the office playing league
>one of his QA leads offered him a room at her place, found out he's a gross nigger that cums on the walls
>eventually settles into a streaming grift on youtube where he successfully uses shorts to get tons of traffic to his channel
>basically larps as a programming/hacking god that always let you know he worked at blizzard when again he was merely a QA grunt
>gets pretty big on twitch, gets invited to wow classic hardcore streamer guild
>was in a 5 man dm group as mage, he basically peaced out as the rest of the group died
>everyone shit on him for ditching, he double/triple/quadrupled down on not doing anything wrong, basically exposig himself as an inveterate narcissist that can never be at fault
>quickly loses a massive chunk of his viewers/revenue (of which a good chunk of was his mods gifting subs and him paying them back lmao)
also, most germane to this thread
>went against ross' SKG initiative, saying it's going to be bad for game devs (he's barely one) like himself
>badmouthing it left and right
>loses even more of his audience
>still hanging on somehow with a fraction of his audience that he had 2 years before
>>
>>
>>737121535
With current events happening all over the world it's hard not to be wary of giving government more control anon, give a finger, take the hand and all.
Not long ago my own government tried to sneak in a clause that would allow them to spy on messaging apps in a law that was supposed to just require age control for social media to "protect the children".
Again I'm siding with this initiative but I do fear giving these retarded elected officials of ours more power because they're fucking shit up plenty enough already as is.
>>
>>
File: 1591453444533.jpg (25.3 KB)
25.3 KB JPG
>>737120160
>>
>>
File: 1756061612305864.png (434.3 KB)
434.3 KB PNG
>>737118321
So the main complaint about skg is just
>It's more work!
Like okay? Sorry for ensuring you hold your job a little longer before the AAA company you work for boots you off so they can hire the new wave of underpaid interns (from india) to work on the next live service slop game
>>
>>
File: 736787890.png (739.9 KB)
739.9 KB PNG
Only snoys and emulatorfaggots support this garbage.
>>
>>
>>
File: 1758186320944547.jpg (4 MB)
4 MB JPG
>>737122172
>
>>
>>
>>737121935
My point was more that society itself is inherently authoritarian and I would support a mass movement of free peoples outward into more isolated and rural settings. Your kids want to run around and be free, but you need to leash them because their natural tendencies will get them run over by a car, so the proximity to the cars is the problem, not the kids when our current practices have it backwards. There's no good ending in sight for where our societies are heading. We didn't get the luxury of being born in the best of times.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737121080
>>737121535
The basic flaw of Libertarianism is that it assumes a society consisting largely of 110+ IQ people that were raised on Christian ethics and morality, and who feel some sense of obligation/duty to their fellow man even in the absence of laws requiring it. When you have such a society, Libertarianism works just fine.
That does not describe our current society.
>>
File: 1746469825480276.jpg (200.9 KB)
200.9 KB JPG
>>737122172
>the bingbing is a drooling mongoloid retard.
Huh, who would've though.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1768275301987261.jpg (64.8 KB)
64.8 KB JPG
>>737120701
We should legalize selling hard drugs wholesale because only retards would be buying that, right?
>>
>>
>>
File: 1663537123602989.gif (3.9 MB)
3.9 MB GIF
>>737122892
>implying the EU not getting more gacha slop is somehow bad
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1758362693135361.gif (1.5 MB)
1.5 MB GIF
This is retarded but it only hurts live service multiplayer slop so I'll take it as a win anyways.
>>
>>737118321
>Are you happy now?
Yes. They shouldn't have sold games with single player components and pulled the plug on them later.
I do think there should be a minimum threshold for compliance however. I don't want indie devs to be hindered by regulations in an industry that should have as much creative freedom as possible. But corporations apparently can't stop themselves from being anti-consumer, so they need oversight.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1754077962051801.png (694.3 KB)
694.3 KB PNG
>>737120061
>>
>>737118484
Paid shills. I'm not kidding. Because social media lets you essentially make anonymous fake accounts it's easy to pay several Indians to go online and argue against our rights since Indians are not the ones being affected by US and EU laws.
>>
File: 1770521403641210.png (162.7 KB)
162.7 KB PNG
>>737118321
YES!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737118484
It's devs arguing for them getting a salary. Imagine getting a comfy paycheck modelling overwatch boobs but overnight games like that become unprofitable so everyone's laid off and you with them. SKG benefits people who like singleplayer games (not even singleplayer games themselves) but fucks over multiplayer games and gachas, which have massively outprofited singleplayer games for the last decade.
>>
>>737124118
>Imagine getting a comfy paycheck modelling overwatch boobs but overnight games like that become unprofitable so everyone's laid off and you with them.
this literally already happens to them as soon as the game launches
>>
>>737118321
Well, if the industry had just shut the fuck up and done what everyone asked them to, instead of making bullshit excuses for why they couldn't do the same sorts of things devs in the 90s did, we wouldn't have to get the government involved.
They learned this lesson real quick last time with the ESRB, there was a problem with games being violent and boomers were too stupid to know "SATAN MURDER 69" wasn't ideal for their 12 year old grandson, so they formed a ratings board that tells you how violent stuff is.
Could have simply adjusted company policy to build things to still function to some extent without a central server, but no, that was too much effort and instead of doing the bare minimum they're all now screaming and crying over potential government involvement.
The game developers of the 90s and 2000s would have unfucked their shit in a month and this whole thing would have been a distant memory in no time.
Fuck around and find out.
>>
>>
File: 1634133525480.jpg (25.4 KB)
25.4 KB JPG
>>737118321
>AAA shills in full panic mode
delicious
>>
>>
File: pepe.jpg (59.1 KB)
59.1 KB JPG
I declined to sign the petition or support in any way when I noticed this is a movement born entirely from spite.
Tell anyone in these threads how this will be detrimental to online games as a whole and you always get the same responses.
>I don’t care
>GAAS deserve to die
>I don’t even play online games lul!!!!
Everyone cheering it on has no actual stake in this beyond ruining fun for everyone else. Pretty pathetic.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Why do obvious eceleb discord shills for this fag campaign always accuse everyone that disagrees with them of being paid shills? Do they actually think companies are paying people to post on an almost dead barely functional imageboard or are they just shameless liars that post the same thing in every thread? see:
>>737118484
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1771064129923323.jpg (40.7 KB)
40.7 KB JPG
>>737119569
They did mention in this same hearing that they've been noticing lootbox degeneracy and that it only worsens the case for live service games since they're withdrawing your stake into the game without your consent or reimbursement
So yes, gachashit is on their sights. But dont expect anything to confront them in the near future
>>
>>737121935
>With current events happening all over the world it's hard not to be wary of giving government more control anon, give a finger, take the hand and all.
But this applies to everyone who has power and authority over others, so giving multibilion companies a pass in the name of not giving more control to the government doesn't really makes sense.
Ideally, we should atrive to make societies where strong powers check each other, while avoiding that their interests become aligned at the cost of the common man.
>>
>>
>>
File: 6863afe2cad66.jpg (146.6 KB)
146.6 KB JPG
>>737120061
>Average left wing meme length
>>737118321
Yes. Shutting down The Crew to sell The Crew 2 is predatory bullshit.
>>737118484
It's mostly companies like Babel Media.
>>737120701
>Just learn beforehand that single player games had a secret kill switch inserted in the encrypted code written on proprietary software that they'll throw you in jail for decoding.
How is the consumer supposed to learn prior to purchasing that Atomfall, a singleplayer game with no online features, is dependent on a central server? How is a purchaser of The Culling 2 supposed to know that the game would be rendered inoperable in 8 days? How about Concord in 11 days? The Day Before in 4 days?
Is it your serious opinion that every person who buys a single player video game should be perfectly fine with their game being taken back in four days?
>>
>>
File: 1756759623174564.gif (297.3 KB)
297.3 KB GIF
>>737124445
>But with SKG, you won't have genshins and overwatches.
There's no conceivable way in which you can frame this concept and make it sound like not a positive, no matter how much you shart or twist your or anyone's words
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737123324
Maybe don't fill the post with slurs like you're on 4chan, zoomer. It's trivial to post a comment on youtube, twitter, etc. without being "shadowbanned" and you don't need to make shit threads on rapeapechan based around comments you won't discuss to the user's face.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1761517632604578.png (640.4 KB)
640.4 KB PNG
>>737125263
In all the circles of people I move in, the grand majority of people that are into gachashit is 99% composed of third worlders, that go above and beyond to lick their chinese corpo overlord's boots clean, absolute retards that think they're cheating the system for being f2p's, one of them outright showing me an screenshot of an excel sheet containing his schedule for all his gacha dailies so he can keep farming the "free" rainbow gizmo currencies
I feel nothing but a bottomless disdain towards gachaniggers
>>
>>
>>
>>737124027
Why would it get shut down by SKG? The SKG does literally nothing to them if they keep the game running.
And when they do decide to stop, just give the players the tools to emulate their own GGG servers.
>>
>>
>>
>>737125745
A bunch of punks in a garage managed to solve this with 1980-1990's resources and documentation, surely late 2020's indies will be able to trivialize this issue with shit like steam's online services, right
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1649465733866.png (258.8 KB)
258.8 KB PNG
>government helps corpos through subsidies and other such crap
>*crickets*
>government helps the people by letting them play games
>"DAWW, DOES POOR LITTLE BABY NEED DADDY GOVERNMENT?"
zero principles. just keel over and die.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737125073
That actual study just showed that shutting down the fear response part of the mind decreased those attitudes, so if anything right-wing politics is proven to be driven mostly by fear and isn't fear an unmanly emotion?
>>
>>
>>737126084
Please anon be more aggressive with these idiots.
SKG does not apply retroactively you fucking retards, it's supposed to apply only to games released after the regulation is passed and the regulation itself might pass with a clause saying it'll only start being policed from 2030 onwards or something like that to give developers time to adapt.
So no, any game you're enjoying right now won't suffer anything because of SKG.
Use common sense ffs.
>>
>>737126117
It’s actually kind of insane how some cult like mobs slobber over the EU’s boots, pretending the less competent and capable bureaucrats should have a superseding say on anything. It’s about as disgusting as those who worship private industry
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737118484
>If I just slap the word "rights" onto anything, that means I should be able to do whatever I want
Your desire to host a private server isn't a "right". If you want to make it a law, go through the normal processes of making one, but there isn't a right to your toys, you child.
>>
>>
>>737118321
I don't think it's gonna result in what Ross wants since that type of legislation would clash with copyright
Yet I see a lot of people just cheering at the prospect of companies canning game development altogether or region locking more content which should be the opposite of the goal here
I think they're probably gonna pass some half-assed voluntary shit that doesn't force companies to do anything, although I think the whole movement at least will shift company towards preservation since it's kind of an hot topic and preservation makes you look good
>>
>>
File: 1766043628039126.png (172.3 KB)
172.3 KB PNG
>>737118321
i was against this because the guy is really ugly but yesterday one of my favorite games announced it's shutting down so now I'm in
>>
>>
File: firefox_qRLdtyIdx6.png (22.8 KB)
22.8 KB PNG
>>737126624
>Because American private industry supersedes the non wants of some pissant foreign body
Oh really?
Please tell me more anon
>>
>>737126389
so fucking what?
run your local server, problem solved
the bullshit here is about how you can lose access to software YOU PAID FOR because of the whim of a souless corpo who sees you, the consumer, as literal cattle, a walking wallet
>>
>>
>>737126390
No, the underpaid, overworked intern that built a piece of concord (not to be confused with the broad with abnormally long nails that wrote more lines in twitter than in the editor) does not shit and piss himself at the idea of trying to make concord into anything but what concord turned out to be
>>
>>
>>737126471
The cost of implementing this for the EU will likely be less than any profit they could make. So the companies making games will likely implement it and since it's implemented might as well make it available to everyone. So it will effect you.
>>
>>737126554
I'm sure you've heard of copyrights. This is because copying is a right, it's the fundamental basis of life itself and of human progress. Law subverts this right. One of many reasons law needs to be ignored and its perpetrators killed.
>>
File: le_american_bear.jpg (18.5 KB)
18.5 KB JPG
>>737126752
wtf :-DDD this is gommunism :-DDDDD
>>
>>
>>737126869
Plus if it ever comes to it the corpos will try to spin this as them being nice to their consumers and their games being the best they can for their costumers or some other bullshit like that.
They'll absolute milk all the brownie points they can from this to somehow try and make up for the loss in their abuse of copyright laws.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737126825
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11519434/
It is literally part of the amyglada which processes fear, anxiety and rage. So essentially speaking conservative people are more negatively emotional which is very blatant to see considering just how negative the vibes the chud space is. How /v/ is consistently the most negative place in the world. It is just a constant stream of bad vibes
>>
>>737126752
>in EU
Best case scenario the EU will just get unpatched games with no online support, and it'll be like the 90's where there are bugged and fixed games on the market and early adopters will be shit out of luck if their copy is bugged.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1776201724463769.jpg (53.4 KB)
53.4 KB JPG
>>737118321
Yes, actually
>>
File: ArmstrongPortraitCigar~2.jpg (299.3 KB)
299.3 KB JPG
>>737118321
>The video game industry is diseased, rotten to the core. There is no saving it - we need to pull it out by the roots. Wipe the slate clean. BURN IT DOWN! And from the ashes, a new age of Video games will be born. Evolved, but untamed! Live services will be purged and the best games will thrive - free to be played as long as you want, they'll make Video games great again!
>>
>>
>>
"Noooo, think of the live-service games! think of the gacha games! this would kill gacha games!"
>game shuts down
>game is now possible to be downloaded and played locally with singleplayer functions, and if gacha, all the characters are unlocked with game currency so you can essentially have everything that normally costs money
>creators "forced" to keep server for downloads up for a few years, so people can archive it
>later, governments and enthusiasts of the world will host megaservers for dead games for everyone so you can download the games, reverse engineer them and possibly revive them, essentially preserving them as long as "libraries exist"
Give me ONE reason this can't happen, and give me one reason why some faggot studio/publisher who kills a game should be bitter enough to prevent someone else from hosting the game as non-profit, on a fan paid server
There is genuinely only ONE reason why anyone would oppose SKG, and that is INDUSTRY GREED - they literally don't want you playing their old games, as the old games are DIRECT COMPETITION to their new, worse releases.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: BToKfv3CEAAIRKg.jpg (35.2 KB)
35.2 KB JPG
>>737118321
>one retard that doesn't even get 1k responses
>>737118484
Getting this gaslit
Propaganda's goal isn't to make you believe in something, It's to make you think everyone else believes in it. They -NEED- you to think their is some mass of boot licking clowns out there so you just comply when they refuse to do what's best for you.
They -NEED- you to believe that these screen grabs account for just as many or more than the people who support the movement.
Do not fall for such bait.
Refuse to be their bottom bitch.
>>
>>
>>
File: 1755622297853956.png (792.9 KB)
792.9 KB PNG
>>737118484
Remember that cyberwarfare is a normal tactic these times, and those "people" arguing against their own rights turn out to belong to either one of two groups:
1. Actual shills simply working for their corporate masters. Create false dissent and opposition (which later gets mass reposted by various automated content farms to try to get more views and people to act against themselves) to laws that are bad financially for corporations, but good and honest for the consumer.
2. Usually mentally deficient/ill, rabid fanboys of some huge corporations, who become enraged like little children if they BELIEVE (key word here) that a given event will hurt their favorite toymaker in the SLIGHTEST. Basically, the second group is very much that "Leave the multibillion dollar corporation alone!" meme turned into an, unfortunately, living being.
>>
>>
>>
>>737128887
I think the second group is very very small in 2026. The good faith people had of these corporations are well and truly dead and the youth of today would sooner defend cartoons of the 1970s than defend any of these companies. Most don't grow up on this stuff anymore and the few that do die from cringe when they discover people as old as there parents are into this shit.
It's why most lines to buy pokemon cards are just full of old greying men.
>>
>>
>>737129104
I don't think so. Too many people were born into this hell and just don't have the reference frame to really conceptualise how much better it could be. There are a lot of overemotional, screeching children. Particularly with short-form content having fried their decision centers for good. But, who knows? Shudder.
>>
There's tons of ways of doing this with a little bit of malicious compliance so that the end user doesn't actually end up with jack shit. Like releasing the actual host software in such a state that you'd need a supercomputer to run it. Or have some time-gates stuff in the game and have it default to a really shitty state of the game. Or have the last update be really broken and buggy and then release the hosting software based on that final shitty patch. I don't think this law is going to actually work the way people think it's going to because there's a huge financial incentive against it => people are gonna fuck with it.
>>
>>
>>
File: 1747067370662906.jpg (10.7 KB)
10.7 KB JPG
>I'm not usually in any of these committees but I thought to come for the side quest. It is dangerous to go alone into the digital future without clear consumer protections and I don't want to set the world on fire, but the truth is that the way we own media has shifted into something that's very sus. Too often, citizens buy a game only to find out that the cake is a lie. You buy a game you hope to cherish for years, but then one day it's suddenly gone. You think, "Shit, here we go again." When the publisher pulls the plug, we realize that our princess is in another castle. Our liberty, our libraries are emptied. It's like we've died of dysentery. As we've heard, currently players are forced to see the purchases that they made completely vanish. We should not have to endure and survive a marketplace where our purchases which are often masterpieces and they bring so much joy are treated as disposable. We cannot allow digital preservation to take an arrow to the knee. So a petition was started to address all of these issues and it is super effective. Let us therefore congratulate over 1 million citizens who signed it with one clear message to the EU. Don't be sorry, be better. It's time to finish the fight. We must ensure that even when companies move on, the virtual worlds we paid for remain still alive. Let us praise the sun on a new era of digital rights so that for the gamer of the future, it isn't simply game over.
>>
>>737128619
99% of gachashit's only worth is a fucking gallery for big titty hoes, and I say 99% in hopes that there's a single fucking gacha somewhere that has gameplay worth half a shit, if they get reverted into a softcore scenario gallery, that is only exposing the game's true nature as there is nothing else for it to be "played" for
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: firefox_Wit9MAZPzQ.png (21.5 KB)
21.5 KB PNG
>>737129278
It has been tried before, didn't went well then, it won't go well now.
Picrel had to pay a 500 million fine because of these shenanigans btw.
>>
>>737118484
It’s not rights
But I think people are misunderstanding this hugely
They want no government involvement, which I agree
Mould lord just wants companies to not have the power to take a game away from you that you’ve already paid for
>>
>>
>>
>>737120680
I can see a problem with that, you are forcing companies to freely give their online system up, if they make another using the same system, it will be more easily piratable and pirate private servers will be easy to set up.
If a company happens to develop a new in house security system, they would obliged to divulgue what are corporate secrets and have real value up for free, it's actually really problematic if you give it any thought.
>>
>>
>>737129759
Tell me when that happens. I don't believe we should stop doing anything good for the people because it might eventually, at some point, have negative consequences. Laissez-faire capitalism is nonsense.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737129751
Well fortunately SKG isn't hounding for a specific solution but for any solution for the game to be playable after the publisher destroys it.
So they can come up with something that doesn't compromise their security.
>>
File: sowell.jpg (71.7 KB)
71.7 KB JPG
>gibs me dat 50 petabyte server
>>
>>737129908
What about the second statement?
If a company happens to develop a new in house network security system for online games, you are setting up the precedent that the State can just force a private entity to give up secret valuable information under the threat of violence for what are frankly frivolous reasons.
>>
>>737129212
>just don't have the reference frame to really conceptualise how much better it could be
You misunderstand, I think they have no interest in it, regardless of what they think is normal. That's what made the 83 crash happen, the youth just stop caring, they saw garbage, shrugged, and left. That's happening right know, very very fucking few kids are into anything video games. Pokemon and Mario are last standing but even then it's a 4 to 1 ratio of adults to kids that are into it. And I'm not talking the shit you see online, getting anyone/child or adult to act stupid online is easy look at that OP, one clown who no one knows and retards act like it accounts for millions.
We are so fuck because people just believe lies so they can hate something that isn't them.
>>
>>
File: 1759251127005102.gif (1.5 MB)
1.5 MB GIF
>>737120221
People defend Chinese gachaslop cause Japan's lazy and can't make anything Genshit/WuWa-quality at all (both are absolutely mid but the Japs fall short of even that) and the West keeps trying to force coons and troons. The moment Japan stops fucking digging in it's own ass and the West stops trooning out, people won't care what happens to chink gachas. But until then people would rather consoom Chinese gacha than play Bandai-Namco or Nintendo's latest recycled slop or the Concord-type shit from the West. We live in a timeline where chinks are making better games than everyone else by the sheer virtue of the bar being set so low by everyone else it may as well be in the ground rather than the chink games being actually amazing.
>>
>>
>>
File: 1775926974906029.png (140.7 KB)
140.7 KB PNG
>>737118810
Needs to be stickied and given as a ban reason for every offsite cap poster.
>>
>>
>>737118484
It's like whites who have been conditioned to ask "where are the black people" in eastern video games. They are mentally unable to understand that countries might consist of a mostly homogenous population and biggest countries in the world are just like that.
>>
>>
>>
>>
I only play Japanese gacha made by Koreans and don't really care if it disappears completely once it EoS. meh. Vast majority of people don't spend any money on it either. EU gonna EU, but I will be mad if they get my gacha taken down.
>>
>>
>>737125073
>How is a purchaser of The Culling 2 supposed to know that the game would be rendered inoperable in 8 days? How about Concord in 11 days? The Day Before in 4 days?
How come the Culling and Day Before aren't considered part of the Concordian timeline?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737130113
There is exactly one game I can think of that can use this excuse and it's MSFS 2024. Which was a catastrophically retarded idea and one of the primary reasons why the game is such a dumpster fire.
Even then, there is nothing technically stopping them from releasing server binaries without the assets so that modders could put the game back together after Microsoft stops caring.
>>
>>737130574
If I paid money for it, and you took it, you are legally responsible of my ability to play the game
So either pay those servers or pay the jeet to make the server files public
Or you know, design the game so the player can host his own games so you dont have to pay to retrofit the entire system to comply with consumer rights.
Sorry for the antisemitism
>>
>>737130969
SKG seems to be fine with that too, publishers just have to put the exact expiry date on the box. Let customers know as soon as they're about to hand over money that they're not paying to own anything, but see how many copies you sell.
>>
>>737118484
Stockholm syndrome.
It has unironically been bred into anyone born after 2000. Anyone born before that is mostly resistant to it, but you do have a few weak minds here or there.
Just look at the Destiny community. Anyone that asks Bungie to do their $3bill job gets raped for attacking a small indie company.
>>
File: 1666320444775969.gif (1.4 MB)
1.4 MB GIF
>too hard
idg what the issue is. Just release the tools you use to host game servers, the burden is on the consumer to be tech savvy enough to actually use them. There's no stipulation that average joe retard should be able to press button receive game server. Bear in mind based autistic diehard fans have revived dead online games WITHOUT any official support by reverse-engineering the client and determining what the server should be doing to support it, so if it ends up being the case that you just have to care enough to learn how it works then that's fine.
>they'll just avoid yurop
Any studio that thinks their game is going to actually make money will recognise that the cost of doing the above is tiny compared to opting out of the european market, even if that market isn't the biggest.
>server software is IP
Game clients are IP, guess we can't have those on your PC either?
>>
File: e9baa8hrpdjc1.jpg (109.1 KB)
109.1 KB JPG
>>737130905
We used to be able to do that just fine.
>>
>>737131264
Seems a little to rigid to me. I'm sure a company can define a date they're willing to go for based on their allocated finances, but as a consumer I'd much rather have it last as long as it's financially sustainable.
>>
>>737118484
Because all burgers instinctually understand that government is supposed to serve corporations and oppress commoners and when someone tries to oppress corporations using the government they start acting like house niggers
>>
>>
>>
>>737125073
>How is the consumer supposed to learn prior to purchasing that Atomfall, a singleplayer game with no online features, is dependent on a central server?
From what I can tell, on PC its only online requirement is Steam itself and Denuvo DRM. If you can buy and download the game, then you can play it.
The PS5 version is technically playable completely offline but does have game breaking bugs on disc which need an update, unknown if pre-updated discs are available or not.
>>
File: 1776435407449814.png (180 KB)
180 KB PNG
>NOOOOOOO THE POOR GACHA DEVS WON'T BE ABLE TO SCAM (some) PEOPLE WHO WILL WAIT FOR THE FULL VERSION OF THE GAME INSTEAD
Hahahaha holy shit
These are the "arguments" from anti-SKG faggots
Gachaniggers are truly subhuman
>>
>>
>>737131737
The retarded monkey cannot even conceptualize the thought of having all those microtransactions being free shit because the game is dead and no one pays money for it anymore. He is so indoctrinated that he needs someone to charge him money for something, at all times.
>>
>>
>>737131269
There is no technical issue, the true issue for game companies is that this gives an uncomfortable (for them) amount of control to the end user.
They would risk ending up getting caught in a Catch 22 situation where they either keep supporting a game forever or give it to the community and become competition for their next game (especially if it's shittier or the community start getting shit done with the old game).
You have to understand that most corpos CEO are narcissistic sociopath that would rather die than cede any amount of control over what they see as "theirs" to others.
>>
>>737131737
>B-but think of all the fun gambling games we will lose!
>They will have to let you buy all characters instead of gambling $100k
>We will loose ALL gacha games!!!!!
Holy shit are these actual humans? Like this isn't an AI poster on that forum?
>>
>>737131737
Gacha wouldn't be included in any legislation anyways since it's mostly mobile games and the EU is looking to kill sideloading in preparation of the EU digital identity, so anything not on the app stores might as well not exist, and anything not maintained continuously by an approved developer isn't gonna be allowed on the app stores at all.
>>
>>
>>737131737
That argument itself is non-sensical, if a company wants one their games to enter EOL it means they don't really intend to make money off it or else they'd keep the servers online so why the fuck do microtransactions even matter here?
>>
>>
File: vegeta-kneel.gif (2.3 MB)
2.3 MB GIF
>>737132095
I-...,
Forgive me, I kneel.
I will now pay $20 into a gacha of your choosing.
>>
>>
File: 1615298822861.jpg (117.1 KB)
117.1 KB JPG
This is quite possibly the first time in my life I feel truly and unequivocally proud of being a modern European without any reservations, the nuclear seething from amerijeetkikes from the west and chinkgooknips from the east is nourishing my soul.
Why yes, I signed the Stop Destroying Videogames European Citizens' Initiative. I will also sign any future initiatives that protect my videogame customer rights.
>>
>>
>>737131480
That would be the ideal scenario, yes, but you absolutely know that this situation would be (has been) abused until you force corporations to behave
The easy way to maliciously comply with this would be, adding another fine print paragraph stating "This game's services will be available until 202X at minimum, depending on the game's performance"
>>
>>737131983
>accidentally (on purpose) make your live service game bug-ridden hot garbage at planned EOL (with AI, no meddling ethical human whistleblower involvement necessary)
>hand over the keys to the car you just poured sugar into the gas tank of, took a shit in the glovebox and jerked off over the driver's seat
>>
>>
File: skg69.jpg (141.6 KB)
141.6 KB JPG
>>737130565
seth, is that you?
>>
File: 1745617979533357.png (250.9 KB)
250.9 KB PNG
>>737118321
he's right, all this is going to lead to is companies looking even further into roms/emulation and doubling down harder, like emulation and getting a digital copy of a game illegally is still very much still illegal doesn't matter what mental gymnastics you do to justify it, and this retard comes and is like 'well not only do we play your games without paying, but now we demand you maintain them for us' yeah good luck with that. commies love to create rights where they don't exist and demand the universe that everyone owns them something, whats even the point of all this, 4chan getting infested by reddit was the worse that could have happened and we have nowhere else to go
>>
>>737132640
Wouldn't be ideal, but the community has been able to resurrect games from basically nothing.
Hell, the "final fuck you patch" is basically meaningless if just one guy makes a backup of the pre patch client and then other fans adjust it with the offline parts of the final patch.
>>
>>
>>737132640
Pretty sure this kind of sabotage would be an unlawful and punishable act
if you're supposed to give the customer the product they paid for (without online features), then surely this means you're not allowed to intentionally fuck it over by making singleplayer story unplayable or something
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: hehegood.png (297.9 KB)
297.9 KB PNG
>>
>>
>>737132892
Or just remove any currency requirement.
After all, what's the point? Obviously any kind of monetization is gone and I have a hard time thinking of any company who would care about "proper balance" in their game's final EOS patch.
>>
>>
>>737132774
For the hundred millionth umpteenth time,
nobody is asking for companies to maintain them
all they have to do is give customers the option to obtain their copy of the game in a playable state
it does not need to include online features, it just needs to be accessable and, at best, re-hostable by the owner of the copy, should they want to have a private server up.
This means the creator wouldn't need to do anything more beyond shutting down online requirements and offering a limited free download after EOS
>>
>>
File: 265423786534768346746.gif (2.1 MB)
2.1 MB GIF
>>737118321
Nothin personell kid
>>
>>737132891
Live service games remove shit all the time though. Fortnite just removed some old game modes. Destiny 2 removed half the fucking game. And neither one is shutting down anytime soon.
Depending on how the legislation is written what might end up happening is that all live service games launch as shitty offline only games with like one map and bot deathmatch for a day, before an additional update adds all the actual content. Then when the plug is pulled, they just revert back to the build with fuck all in it.
Old games won't be grandfathered in anyways so any game under upcoming legislation would be specifically built for it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737131367
Basically. Allowing people to host their own games again is not only simple, but much less costly than using dedicated servers. But, if you allow that, you no longer can just pull the plug on the multiplayer function of the game and order the goyim to be hyped for the next opportunity to spend money SOON.
>>
>>
>>737133090
During the EU hearing one of the parliament members floated around the idea of a "right to restore" for games, where fans would be allowed by the law to restore any kind of cut content for a game that no longer receive support.
>>
>>
>>
>>737133059
That's not necessarily up to the developers though.
Say for example that after these new rules come out I buy a disc copy of Battlefield 8 for PS6. At launch it's an online-only game heavily reliant on servers.
Then in 10 years they shut it down so players move on to Battlefield X instead and give BF8 the mandatory offline EOL update. My disc copy is still entirely reliant on Sony PSN servers being online to give me the EOL update, and any digital versions would also need to authentificate me as having actually purchased a copy at all.
So in 20 years when the PS6 update servers get shut down, I'm once again gonna be shit out of luck. Nothing was actually permanently preserved, only the can got kicked down the road. And this is the best case scenario.
>>
>>737133026
If there's no currency, there's no reason to grind
If there's no reason to grind, there's no reason to stomach some tedious, subpar game to purchase the softcore porn and bouncing bazonga pngs
And if there's no need to do any of that to unlock the actual endgame, there was no need to play the game in the first place, exposing the gacha genre's true worth for anyone to see: worthless
>>
>>
>>
>>737133090
true, but unless they destroyed every other version of the game other than the first or last, they'd preferrably be forced to offer different versions of the game, like vanilla or updated
Many games these days do those complete 180's where they just ruin a game - so, it would be reasonable for the customer to demand the version they paid for, aka the original, before it got ruined, as well as the final, assuming people still bought the game at that point.
If people spent money on it, it should be available EoS, that's pretty much the gist of the whole movement.
The only thing people are not demanding is the online features, however, those features should be possible to access via private servers
>>
>>
>>
>>737133292
Then implement them only at EOS, that way it's a moot point.
>>737133202
Then make Overwatch 2 actually better than the first game, so people have a reason to move there.
>>
>>
>>737130209
Should private entities be allowed to have trade secrets or be obliged to share them?
>>737132019
If you kill their monetization, there won't be any new games in the future and the fans lose on the long term, you aren't thinking.
>>
>>
>>737129687
I have been told dozens of times by the same people supporting this that you merely have a license to use the game and the corporation bad can revoke it any time (like when saying no-no words). Is this correct or not?
>>
>>
>>737133263
GTA Online removes licensed music all the time due to expired licenses. So I can just re-upload these songs online specifically so they can be modded back into the game? Somehow them having been in the game temporarily grants me, the consumer, an irrevocable and eternal license to redistribute these songs but only for this exact purpose?
Same with licensed third party art assets such as collabs, and any third party middleware that was once ripped out of the game.
>>
>>
>>737119510
>publishers sold temporal access to games
If game purchases have always been temporary (temporal LMAO) why can I still play my 40 year old colecovision cartridges? You'd think that would've expired a long time ago.
>>
>>
>>737133304
So you are able to play your choice of slop for 20 years instead of the 3 years of it keeps generating actual revenue to the publisher before they shut it down to cut on costs
It's not a solution, but it's already an improvement even by your own made up defeatist scenario
>>
>>
>>
>>737130123
>We are so fuck because people just believe lies so they can hate something that isn't them.
That's all the internet is anymore, just crabs in a imaginary bucket. All pretending they are stuck, all blaming the crabs for why they can't climb out of something that doesn't exist.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: HFT3UtuW0AA-fXb[1].jpg (91.4 KB)
91.4 KB JPG
>this kills the whole AAAA industry
>>
>>737133347
And who ensures those versions will be available forever, specifically for the paid consumers?
Someone somewhere will still need to host the files and authentificate the original purchases. Even if you made them abandonware and just relied on randoms personally hosting them, sideloading and all the various bits of copy protection and dependency on stuff like Steamworks or Xbox Live mean they'll still be dependent on some online server somewhere.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737133592
It's AI like the OP. Nothing here is real. You are just being mined for AIs to keep making fake posts.
The goal is to get an internet that just fools rich and powerful people into things the public never wanted and to make the public think that everyone believes things that they never did.
I can't blame them.
You won't talk to people in the real world so they know they have a captive audience.
>>
>>737124496
>>737124496
We're still waiting, frogposter
>>
>>
>>
>>737127468
>Best case scenario the EU will just get unpatched games with no online support,
lol wat. Why in the name of fuck would a publisher kneecap its sales in the EU, instead of spending a minuscule amount of money on an EOL plan?
>>
>>737133540
Unfortunately that's now how you write a law though. If the law states that this product shall be eternally available then it damn well better be. And there is no truly reliable way to ensure continued availability of a digital good, shit gets lost on the internet all the time.
If the law states that it shall be available for an X number of years well that's its own can of worms that once again places insane burdens on platform providers. There's still new PS4 games coming out in 2027, so if a rule mandated 20 years of updates they might still have to keep the PS4 servers alive into the 2050's! God forgive if there's some non-fixable security flaw or other issue in the infrastructure itself.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: ja.jpg (50.3 KB)
50.3 KB JPG
>>737131737
>if you take away the gambling boxes and daily chores there wont be any game left!
gacha niggers need to be saved from themselves.
>>
>>
File: 1776454803741.jpg (79.2 KB)
79.2 KB JPG
>>737118484
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_consciousness
>>
>>737131737
>>737133996
people in this board will still tell you that gacha is just the form of monetization and not an actual genre
>>
File: huh.jpg (165.1 KB)
165.1 KB JPG
>>737118484
>>
>>737133717
Nobody
the point isn't to ensure it's "forever", but to give the customer a chance to obtain it and be responsible for it in the future
Ideally, this would bring forth a new kind of digital museum/library, full of copies of games that no longer have hosting/service from their original creators, that, for those who care, can be downloaded and edited to be fully online on private servers
>>
File: 2378523982574798234634673547.gif (2.3 MB)
2.3 MB GIF
>>737133910
>Le both sides wrong dichotomy
Same old jewish tricks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1775338209909060.jpg (71.3 KB)
71.3 KB JPG
>>737118321
Honestly just burn it all to the ground
Yes, i sincerely hope this ross guys achieves whatever he wants and ends up in total annahilation of the current game industry.
>>
>>737133996
They dont
They seriously dont
They dont even deserve to be saved
But if you dont address them, this shit is enabled and festers
It sadly is on your own interest to keep these retards from sticking their dicks in the power sockets
>>
People saying
>THEY WON'T MAKE NEW LIVE SERVICE GAMES
are concern trolling. If you actually care about live service multiplayer games, you should support SKG. Because those are the games primarily hit by being killed off (though single-player, non-GAAS games can b e murdered in the same way). If you're claiming to like a genre, why would you be happy that games in that genre can be permanently killed off, never to be played again? I'm a fan of MMOs, and the idea of every MMO being permanently playable is AMAZING to me. There have been a lot of great MMOs that just died with no recourse to play them again despite how much people care. I was heartbroken when City of Heroes died, and you would not believe how happy I was when Homecoming brought it back. And SKG is trying to make that scenario a reality for every online game, rather than having to rely on incredibly dedicated fans to put in a ton of work.
Anybody that sincerely thinks that it will cause fewer games to be made just doesn't actually understand what the initiative is asking for, they're a paid shill, or they're concern trolling. Anybody that is okay with games they claim to like or care about dying is just a fucking idiot. Destruction of media isn't acceptable, no matter what that media is. Even if it's not yet something you personally care about, it will eventually hit something you DO care about.
>>
>I can to this day boot up a PC copy of Bioshock 2 and play the jankass multiplayer mode that was shit out at the last minute to chase trends
>But it's impossible to keep the lights on for a game that bombed three weeks ago
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737134082
How the hell would that even work as law? Do they just mandate that the files must be downloadable some 2 years after the EOL date and after that it's just gone?
Also don't get your hopes up for redistribution rights. That shit is part of international trade agreements with the US and will definitely not be rewritten for this shit, same with cracking copy protection.
>>
>>
>>
>>737134567
everyone is retarded including me
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 402940972340972346098236.gif (1013.2 KB)
1013.2 KB GIF
>>737134563
Because he can, fuck you
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737129751
A lot of it, including the Crew itself, is not something that even needs that. It's literally just the asinine DRM that needs to go through an authentication server that the purveyor no longer wants to maintain. The game in question literally had an offline mode unused in it. To fix this they would literally just need to disable the need for authentication so you could access the software without a "Cannot connect to auth. server" message cockblocking you. It's a literal nothing problem that is brought about simply because the company is a spiteful group of soulless suits.
>>
File: 1775076357903827.gif (2.7 MB)
2.7 MB GIF
>>737134629
Perhaps I judged you too harshly. My bad.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737132019
>>737133375
Gacha games will still be made and sold. It's only after the devs have abandoned the game that any legislation would apply
>>
>>737134203
Not even to pay.
Currency for rolling characters is still needed to get their meta alt in an ultra slutty swimsuit (that is only available in the still monetized sequel), same thing for skin or other cosmetics.
>>
>>
>>
>>737133910
It's simpler to say that most people don't understand what it's about, period. Like, holy shit, some idiot asked Ross about Valve's 30% cut like that's fucking relevant at all. Complete waste of time. I want to believe that was a bot.
>>
File: 1737304692169213.png (186 KB)
186 KB PNG
How will the Ubisoft executives be sentenced when the Vidyamberg trials are finished?
>>
>>737134997
The online functionality has spread far beyond just copy protection. Back then it was just for the copy protection.
Now it's also game data distribution, purchase authentification, some games even mandate online save data. Simply getting rid of one online layer does not end the battle in a way that is meaningful anymore.
>>
>>
>>737135108
https://x.com/StopKilingGames/status/2044957890432110625/photo/2
>>
>>737118810
The flaw in this thinking is that other platforms actively filter and silence certain opinions and that has been proven several times over.
SKG is heavily oppressed because it stands to cost several megacorporations billions in illicit profits.
>>
File: Screenshot_20260418-045201.png (1.5 MB)
1.5 MB PNG
>>737132479
I have no idea what you see in this game but I am a man of my world. Took an hour to get through the tutorial and figure out how to download the uncensored version.
>>
>>
File: skg79.jpg (79.7 KB)
79.7 KB JPG
>>737133772
is this the new narrative?
>>
>>737131737
Ok so then why did Nintendo release a full version of Pocket Camp (a gacha, e.g. those obnoxious random Fortune Cookie sets that needed cash currency to buy) that cost like $20? Harsh reality is that if everyone was like "we'll wait lol" the game would die and have no content to bother making a private server for. That's why the common sentiment to whales is "Thanks for keeping the servers running" because that means more content in the pipeline. I'm arguing against the gacha screenshot by the way, if that's not evident. SKG wouldn't kill off GaaS, especially because the whole fucking model of gacha is f2p. He literally fucking said in his initial pitch that f2p mtx slop is not affected by SKG because you don't ever BUY the game. It's always marketed as a service and does not charge an upfront fee. This is different from some retail game charging you $60 then saying they're shutting down the auth server so you can't play your full price purchased good anymore because of their dogshit DRM.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737135242
SKG is being opposed because some people have seen what EU legislation actually looks like and what it achieves in reality. The only EU mandate you idiots have ever heard of is the USB-C one, completely ignoring the decades of shit decisions that have actually hurt consumers and their rights while claiming to champion them.
>>
>>737134997
Its decades too late. You don't try to stop a bolder from running over you if you don't have the strength to stop it along with its massive momentum, you should have stopped it when it first dropped and prevented it from picking up speed, far easier. Now the EU has to find a legal mandate that flies in the face of 10 years worth of legal precedence with no way to enforce it. The hope is that the mandate with give consumers the strength to challenge this momentum, which is very hard comparatively.
>>
I don't want SKG to happen because honestly chuds just should die. I don't really care if it defends Jews or corporations or whatever. I just hate chuds and want them to die. If all rightoids were slaughtered the world would be a better place. Anything rightoids support should be destroyed or lowkey banned.
>>
>>
>>
>>737134594
"Any solution is better than no solution"
the goal here is to force them to have an end of service plan, BEFORE they run out of money or development and have to go end of service.
The idea is that the laws would apply pressure to new games so that they HAVE A FUCKING PLAN instead of just pulling the plug whenever they feel like it, with zero care for customers who paid money
the best case scenario would be that they manage their funds in a way that they can afford to host download for a limited time, so that customers who can no longer access their LIVE SERVICE, would download the "playable state" version with no online features, and then they'd be able to host those online features themselves, or just play a singleplayer campaign or whatever
The point here is to FORCE a new customer-friendly approach, instead of the old customer-scamming "not my problem" approach
>>
>>737119510
> imagine you need the room for your dying mother
Sorry chuds, I'm gonna need the McChicken you ate the other day to end hunger in Africa. You better have it by tomorrow or I'll sue you for violation of my property rights. You should have made your own McChicken if you wanted to eat it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737135548
>>737135556
Nah, if chuds support this then it's trash. Go die in a fire.
>>
>>737135307
Making the regulation dependent on exactly what the consumer has purchased is a necessary step that will effectively kill any such regulation.
Here's a fun fact for you, did you know that the last Call of Duty game released on PlayStation is the Modern Warfare II reboot? Every title since then has been additional content bolted on to MWII. It's all running in the MWII executable with the campaigns technically just being DLCs for it. So when you buy a copy of say Black Ops 7, what exactly have you legally bought?
>>
File: Screenshot_20260418-045316.png (1.5 MB)
1.5 MB PNG
>>737135246
3000¥ is a little under 20$ so I rounded up
>>
>>
>>
File: chudda.jpg (140.4 KB)
140.4 KB JPG
>>737135750
>You know what also 100% of chuds do?
Nothing.
>>
>>
>>737134594
Just have the law be vague, like "a game must be left in relatively playable condition" and allow devs to interpret that however they want. If someone has issue with the condition their game has been left in, they can take it to court and precedent can be set. Simple as.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737119998
We had games with dedicated server software for decades. It used to be that was the only way to do it. Some people had LANs, but no high speed internet access. The game itself just came with a server browser and the publisher would operate a bunch of servers themselves on the open internet.
If it was possible to do that economically back then, it should be possible to do it now.
If you want skill based matchmaking, you connect to the publisher's servers. If you don't give a fuck and just want to play with your friends, you connect to someone else's server or start your own.
That doesn't change anything about game design. TF2 had unlocks, in-app purchases, cosmetics, and progression tracking long before it had skill based matchmaking and it never had to do away with community servers to make it possible.
It's just not necessary to lock the player base down to official servers to have all the features of a modern multiplayer game, as much as they insist that it is.
The only reason they want to do that is so they can be judge, jury and executioner of who gets to play the game and when. So they can charge subscription fees and sell Battle Passes with no alternatives. They don't want enclaves of players bouncing slurs back and forth at each other, even if they're not welcome on the official servers. They want to be able to revoke access to the whole game on a whim, so you'll have no choice but to move on to the next thing they publish.
>>
>>737135503
Any solution is not necessarily better as this legislation would FORCE abandonware to move from being a non-existent legal grey area that's technically illegal but almost entirely unenforced, and instead it'd become a strictly defined and heavily enforced concept with clear limits on what is and isn't allowed.
>>
>>737130434
That's ignoring the point, bootlicker.
Arc Raiders is beloved by tons of retards but it's on the decline. I firmly believe it will be the first time the mass modern audience gets a taste of just how bad this business practice is and it will bring in millions of soldiers.
>>
>>737135660
And he outright said, this does not cover every game. I don't think that harms it, it just establishes reasonable limitations to it that explicitly say that it's not the absurd sweeping industry killer that detractors paint it as.
As for DLC, I think it would depend on how it was formatted. Personally I would not include it unless it was sold as a separate product that required a base product vs an in-game purchase, but I'm not Ross. I just watched his videos and know that SKG isn't the boogeyman people here act like it is.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737135160
>Now it's also game data distribution, purchase authentification, some games even mandate online save data.
And ALL of that can be done locally as well.
>Simply getting rid of one online layer does not end the battle in a way that is meaningful anymore.
If it's so meaningless, why are you and your fellow shills so agitated?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737135436
>Now the EU has to find a legal mandate that flies in the face of 10 years worth of legal precedence with no way to enforce it.
>legal precedence
There isnt any. Nobody defended always online DRM in court, ever.
>with no way to enforce it.
I think it's pretty easy to enforce, actually.
>>
>Play shit games with bad business practices made for retards
Stop that. You made this problem. I don't support you.
>Actively seeking to destroy the practice of Always-Online at any cost, with risk of destroying the entire industry
You have my unwavering support and admiration. My loyalty is unshakable if you remain stalwart.
>>
>>
>>737136248
That would be hilarious. It would be like the kiss of death.
>look here we have GOG games that have taken a commitment to keep games alive and updated for decades
>or you can instead buy this game with an expiration date of 1 year
KEK! If they do this i am going to laugh my ass off!
>>
>>737136070
It's not Ross job to define the specific on how the law should be implemented or how they should handle edge cases.
As much as you can shit on the EU, once they actually start to move their asses they generally (though not always) tend to hire competent people, experts in that particular subject matter.
Also most of the parliament members that are likely to take an interest in this are probably gamers themselves who are familiar with the kind of issues SKG is fighting against.
>>
>>
>>737135160
SKG is asking for removing whatever layers are necessary in order to keep a game operational after the devs stop supporting it. That could be online, that could be data distribution or save data or any combination of it. What work must be done will be unique to each game, but the end goal is the same regardless.
>>
File: 1769293148421751.png (2.7 MB)
2.7 MB PNG
it wasn't always like this
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737136248
That really is the most likely outcome and the most reasonable one to implement in both technical terms and in legalese.
So then Gran Turismo 8 is gonna say on the box "This game is heavily dependent on Online functionality guaranteed to remain available until at least 08/08/2038", and then if the game is successful they give it a six month extension when every now and then until they just stop giving extensions and suddenly the game is dead.
Refunds would be limited to if the online functionality is purposefully killed off due to a non-technical or non-security reason before that date with no intention of bringing it back online. If the servers go down cause the company went bust then you can go pound sand just like today.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737136568
>>737136248
that would be great, because not only would it help better inform people of what they're buying, but also act as an easy to spot red flag I can use to conclude that such a game isn't worth my time and money. Best case scenario, such games would be financial failures and the industry will learn not to sell them any more.
>>
>>
>>
>>737136248
>literally STOP KILLING GAMES
>"uhh actually it'll only mean expiration dates"
that doesn't adress the issue at all,
the best it does is tell people when the inevitable happens, which obviously the creator doesn't want to, or cant, say with certainty, as it heavily depends on success
>>
File: 1773791334026097.jpg (209.3 KB)
209.3 KB JPG
>>737118484
Because their uninformed, stupid, retarded, a glowie, a shill, a corpo plant, or a troll.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>737136707
The only reason some games keep the save data in their server is to prevent cheating (like adding infinite amount of premium currency), once the game has been EOS'd that point is moot and they can just patch it so that saves are stored offline.
>>
>>737136837
Americans do it out of misguided individualism. Indians do it because they're brown nosing scammers who want to do it themselves one day. The japs tho just literally think it's impolite to violate a corporation's right to your asshole.
>>
>>737136823
You're arguing that consumers are retards who need helmets, which isn't necessarily wrong.
A reasonable person of a sound mind would see the current "Significant in-game functionality is dependent on online servers" and simply assume that there must be something on the other end the game is connecting to, and that other end will not be there forever even without being explicitly told when that will happen.
>>
>>
>>
>>737133592
can't find that one, but there is another good one from the same dude:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5Ay_aOUcFw&lc=UgyZEz__KYbsgrtP-jZ4AaA BAg
>>737133772
Cuck.
>>
>>
>>
>>737136980
Consumers ARE retards who need helmets. That's why businesses across every single industry are able to get away with so much scummy, manipulative or downright illegal bullshit. You're correct that a reasonable person would see otherwise, but the fact is that reasonable, sound minded people are a VERY small minority.
>>
>>737136568
You are forgetting one key aspect.
If they go with the expire date solution, those games would definitely be classified as services, not products.
And guess what, if they are a service then freely distributing pirates copies that do not rely on any part of their server infrastructure would be perfectly legal.
>>
>>737118810
nigga,"say something" you say .... i got banned 3 fucking times from resetera and 2 from reddit , i said things and got banned for it , you cant say anything other than their discurse there otherwise you get banned
>>
>>
>>
>>737133715
for me it's
>>
>>737133592
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIfRLujXtUo&lc=Ugx1yv9EOB5IdNXDTWp4AaA BAg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIfRLujXtUo&lc=Ugxe75GTjnlneSzUp1J4AaA BAg
>>
>>737138042
If people were reading all the text on the box, this wouldn't be an issue in the first place.
Also if expiration dates truly did cause significant losses in sales, then someone will eventually sue the EU on that basis and have the language softened, changed or whatever to counter those losses. This happens all the time in other industries.