File: IMG_0991.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

Here’s a good introductory article for those unfamiliar with Walter Russell which ties his work to broader concept of Panpsychism: https://www.kevinmeyer.com/when-prophets-look-like-madmen-walter-russell-and-the-problem-of-being-too-early/

Epistemic destabilization thread. This is a coordinate attack: there's several threads about idealism / solipsism up.

>>42250406
Oh fuck off jewish desert demon worshipper. Im not advocating for solipsism. Objective truth and consciousness being an inherent property of existence aren’t opposing ideas. The same group that game us the Torah gave us the theory of Relativity.

File: IMG_0033.png (1.9 MB)

1.9 MB PNG

>>42250406
>Epistemology
Go away Reptilian Rabbi Gay Liar

>>42250424
I'm not an Abrahamist. Swing and miss.
>Trying to discredit relativity by falsely associating it with Judaism.
Epistemic destabilization.

>>42250441
>Swing and miss
Like your false faggot accusation that my thread is part of a “coordinated attack” of any kind you glowing N.
Now care to actually contribute anything positive to the thread or actually defend your beliefs or “epistemics” via anything other than vague insinuating, muddying water, poisoning wells and other jew behavior?

>>42250452
You proved that your purpose is epistemic destabilization by attacking relativity unprompted.

File: A_Horseshoe_Einstein_Ring_from_Hubble.jpg (102 KB)

102 KB JPG

>>42250452
You can literally see relativity at work as gravitational lensing, such as in this Hubble image. Denying relativity is flat-Earth tier garbage (another epistemic destabilization psyop.)

>>42250469
>>42250479
>brings up flat earth, repeats the same lie over and over (programming through repetition), making all kinds of unfounded claims
Fuck off glowie clown shoes

One thing I noticed about shill dirtbags do when they attack a thread is never actually positively propose ideas or state their position clearly but try to weasel their way into derailing discussion by making negative accusations and then only arguing from that point. This glown@gger clown shoes fucktard hasnt defended one single idea besides pretending to be on the side of “epistemology” which is not itself one specific idea, but the theoretical limit of what we can possibly know and how it comes to be. My jibe at relativity was a joke in response to their comment that my thread was some kind of “coordinated attack” with other threads related to solipsism and “idealism” (?) neither of which are the subject of this thread. I assumed maybe they took issue with the idea of solipsism because its a kind of “relativism” of consciousness proposing that only what one perceives with ones own mind is true. I understand that cultural and moral relativism (both hallmarks of jewish modern thinking) are not the same thing as general relativity, but that was the joke. I think its safe to say at this point any future thread poisoning attempts from this faggot can be ignored.

I guess xir clocked out of his shift at mossad/nsa hq..

>>42250214
>But dualism actually means mind and matter are fundamentally different.
Not always. Mind and matter are both material. Dualism for many is that there is an eternal, inherent, unavoidable difference between material and spiritual.

>>42250764
I agree it was a bit of an oversimplification on my part. Im actually quite interested in learning more about what maybe your referring to, “spiritual dualism” or a type of dual path related to gnosis where one simultaneously recognizes Spirit as infinite and boundless but at the same time rejects false religious and demiurgic notions of “oneness” that have been used to placate and pacify us over the millennia. Maybe thats not where you were going with that idea but it made me think of some stuff I have been pondering lately in questioning the preconceived notions i have long held about the concept of dualism as a purely materialistic philosophy.

>>42250783
Every school of Vedanta except for Advaita has some or total acknowledgement of Dualism.

>>42250791
Thanks I will brush up on the subject. Its weird how when I think about it I am already familiar with that concept as such but I guess over time it got mixed up in my mind with a different similarly named concept. In the west where Christianity is dominant duality is mostly Good vs. Evil in a spiritual sense. I think im just getting old and got the idea of duality as a Spiritual or Philosophical concept in itself misplaced with the idea of “scientific materialism” vs. Spirituality = duality of beliefs but im still not sure why I always associated dualism with atheistic rational materialism.. I will have to meditate on this some more, maybe theres something deeper there.

>>42250214
>Morphogenetic fields
Been interested in these recently, anyone have any introductory stuff about them?

>>42253264
Rupert Sheldrake