Thread #42253027
File: constellation-pattern.jpg (713.1 KB)
713.1 KB JPG
If you do a serious academic study of the history of western occultism, you find that the techniques are extremely conservative and don't really change over the course of literally thousands of years. That's strange, because if they didn't actually work, people would have tried other things and been more fantastical, but they weren't. Pretty much the same methods and practices that existed almost 5000 years BC in Egypt were passed on to the Graeco-Romans, LONG before they were ever inherited by the Jews. And those techniques are the same techniques that have been used by learned men ever since. That seems to suggest that they obtained somewhat reliable results from these techniques.
The absolute earliest western occult practices were "alchemy", long before "kabalah" was invented. Alchemy originated in pre-historical Egypt, and it has also been the focus of study for most of the wisest men I can think of personally. Carl Jung is a good example of someone in modern times who made it the focus of his career, and the results speak for themselves. So I highly recommend anyone wanting to make a serious study of "magic" or "occultism", do not bother with "chaos magic" or the Jewish "qabalah", just stick with "hermeticism" and "alchemy" if you can. Those traditions go ALL the way back, as far as you can go, and they are the only ones to have endured for so long without much alteration in their methods or theories.
20 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>42253027
>If you do a serious academic study
Stopped reading there
Academics is to knowledge what organized religion to... religion(yeah i dont fuck with those who say "spiritual but not religious) spirituality, i mean, people who say that are just hippies. Real religion is spirituality but you wont find it amongst the religious institutions nor the "unorthodox spiritualists" hippie new age fags. Same as occultists. Crowley and blavatsky et al are all garbage. Agree with your general feeling but youve still got much to learn
>>
>>
>>42253090
it did
natural sciences evolved out of "naturalism" which was itself an extension of a field of occult study at the time that frames natural forces through occult lenses like "rays" being cast by planets and all kinds of funky shit.
Like, buddy I know you're just a kid, but maybe you didn't know that even in the early 1900s scientists still believed in "ether" and all kinds of weird occult shit. If you think your ancestors were stupid, hey guess what, in about 20 years you're going to look like a dumb fucking monkey at this rate. Strap that ego in tight.
>>
>>42253551
>'Stopped reading' rather than giving OP a chance to bring new ideas
>Speaks down on individuals who walk other paths
>Implied sense of self importance as 'you've still got much to learn'
I'm glad you agree with OPs general feeling but still NGMI anon. Give his post a read and a genuine reflection. Even autists get it right sometimes
>>
>>
>>42253636
The luminiferous aether wasn't occult, it was literally materialist, postulating that empty space is comprised of a medium that allows light propagate through it. The experimental failure of this theory led to special relativity and modern physics.
>>
>>42253636
I've heard the old "le modern science is really magic hurhuur" nonsense a thousand times, you dumb shit sophist. I'm talking about literally magic, harnessed and controlled as if it were electricity or x-rays or lasers, but still being magic. Like you see in some animes.
>>
>>
File: wn8y5wzuuayc1.jpg (61 KB)
61 KB JPG
>>42253027
>>
>>
>>42253627
>>42253645
Nah. Anon has the right of it. OP wanted to sound are and important, so they said they did an "academic study" when what they meant was they read few books.
It's funny you want to dismiss academic authority, while defending OP's choice of words that is entirely meant to add authority by referring to school systems.
I'd say "let's see the credentials and anything actually published to call this a "serious academic study", but you would just get mad that academia is a thing in the first place.
>>
>>42253636
>naturalism" which was itself an extension of a field of occult study at the time
No I wasn't Naturalists and the proto-scientists were all very openly Christian, and working with the idea that they were studying and explaining God's works.
>>
>>
>>42253885
No shit, they were all apophatic christian mystics, you probably don't even know who the fuck Meister Eckhart even is.
>>42253738
no you fucking stupid faggot, they thought planets projected fucking rays that influenced people's minds and shit
>>42253726
nobody is saying that, you're just reading that in what I said, nobody cares about your fucking grudge
>>42253716
Yes it literally was occult you dumb nigger. I got appropriated from occultist metaphysics and then became a stupid physical theory. Do your fucking homework.
You're all stupid brainless niggers.
>>
>>
>>
>>