>>5098065
Such mechanisms evolved a billion years ago in microorganisms. desu I think there's some else influencing evolution we haven't scratched at. God gene theory really doesn't make sense the deeper you dive into mimicry. At what point does it no longer differ from convergent evolution

I'll go with no, just because the features look similar, doesn't mean they do the same thing. In the case of the flytrap the "teeth" for a cage so the prey can't escape until the trap closes completely, meanwhile animals use teeth to chew, crush and shred .

>>5099864
So it's converging with baleen whales then.

File: fpcry.jpg (69.2 KB)

69.2 KB JPG

>>5100816
I guess so

File: file.png (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB PNG

Nah, insects just love ruining your day by flying in your eyes, so plants were like hah I'm gonna take advantage of that asshole behavior

>>5098065
It's coincidence because they serve a different purpose

>>5102980
>(((cohencidence)))

>>5105065
>i don't understand something so it's jewish
smartest incel

>>5105065
If you're going to be antisemitic at least be a smart one. You groypers are insufferable.

>>5105068
>smartest wincel
yes
>>5105084
>goypers
ftfy

>>5101326
Unsettling image

File: rats426vl8n41.jpg (60.7 KB)

60.7 KB JPG

>>5099864
>In the case of the flytrap the "teeth" for a cage so the prey can't escape until the trap closes completely
There are many examples of teeth doing that. Baleen that anon mentioned is one example. Picrel is another. This fish doesn't have the jaw strength to bite chunks out of prey, and the teeth are the wrong shape for that. The teeth form a cage to entrap small prey. Some kinds of teeth, like molars, are used for grinding up food. But other kinds of teeth have other functions.

File: ToothDefinition.png (45.8 KB)

45.8 KB PNG

>>5105257
One could argue the fish in the picture doesn't have teeth then

>>5100816
>>5101326
>>5105065
kek