>>5104345
what? cats are too stupid to command anything. they’re like fuzzy lizards.

women and betas love cats because their faces and noises remind them of infants. its the same reason they love those horrid flat faced dogs.

no theyre just fluffy and lazy and cute

Reminder that OP is based in India

>>5104362
Saar do the needful.

>I finally understood
Jeet detected.

SARS I FINALLY DOING THE UNDERSTANDING
CAT LOVINGS ARE BE DONE BY THE BLOODY BASTARD BITCHES WHO SUBMITTING

newfag is a decade late to the india hate party

good morning sirs

>>5104677
lost bot from /pol/

>>5104409
Many posters here are russian and ukranian, actually.

>>5104345
but dogs love being commanded

>>5104345
Its actually because people who have sex just like cats for some reason.

>>5104747
Cat owners are less likely to be married, less likely to have children, more likely to be atheist, and more likely to be lgbtq

Cats have been done dirty af by our culture. For centuries they have been shilled as a non-pet pet. It is socially acceptable to totally neglect cats. It is socially acceptable to own an unsocialized skittish aggressive cat. It is socially acceptable to leave cats at home alone for months because the mess is only a little bad, and its acceptable to completely abandon them outdoors despite this cutting their lifespan down to 25% of its max on average (due to the sheer number that die before they turn two). For centuries, cats have been held up by cultural norms as a pet for lazy, mentally ill losers and those are the owners they have as a consequence. As a consequence, shelters are perpetually overflowing with cats in particular and they’re still a rabies reservoir species in the west.

A shame. They’re really friendly, obedient, loyal, and unconditionally loving when owned correctly. But mentally ill losers would rather imagine they’re a steward of the wild and untamed essence of bastet and are being magically protected from rats for their service, so much they seethe at any facts contradicting this (even the facts about egyptian animal sacrifiice traditions trigger them - they like to imagine bastet cults were more palatable and that jesus sucks).

This thread stinks of curry

>>5104759
>legitimate criticism of pet culture? that i have no argument against? uhhhh INDIANS
hinduism is demon worship, and our cultures tendency towards recommending cats to mentally ill losers and satanic occultist/“atheist” freaks has been a disaster for the feline race

your move

>>5104760
demons aren't real and I don't care what happens in the subcontinent as long as they stay away from me.
those 'freaks' are at least the type to keep their feline indoors instead of religious boomers who have 50 semi-feral unfixed cats living in their barn.
your move.

>>5104816
Demons are real. India must be cleansed.

Also, i dont care what your christian boogeyman does as long as they don’t stand with israel. Most christian cat owners I know keep them inside while atheists are vegan tier libturds that think cats hold abstract values and rank the moral value of each animal based on how smart they think they are (incorrect every time)

>>5104832
>Demons are real. India must be cleansed.
america first amigo?
>while atheists are vegan tier libturds that think cats hold abstract values
this I agree with. cats are low tier intelligence meso-predators. there is no evidence for them having the intelligence of a meme budgie let alone an african grey.
>rank the moral value of each animal based on how smart they think they are (incorrect every time)
actually their whole shtick is wanting to reduce the suffering of animals through rejecting eating dead ones. as a whole veganism has stagnated and anti-vegans are more annoying these days.
the reason veganism is a fail is because if they actually believed in progress they would be for genetically engineering the central nervous system out of the animals humans eat, or growing animal tissue directly from cells, but they decry such things as a violation of bioethics. and you bet carnists will be opposed to how "unnatural" it is since every argument they make hinges on the naturalistic fallacy.
to deny hominids evolved to like the taste of meat and the nutritional value of animal products (even red meat, although it is a carcinogen, cry about it dweebs) is untenable.
big pharma is good. vaccines are good. the universe is billions of years old. dinosaurs were real. the ancients were retards. humans will rule forever.

File: Screenshot_20260217-033736.png (178.3 KB)

178.3 KB PNG

>>5104346
Holy chud started backpedaling like his life depends on it. Dogs are also in this category, matter of fact, any animal, the smaller, the "cuter". As for domination, you lil chud, let me say something that would've been unsaid in this discussion. Cats don't give a shit, and they have zero fucking regrets, unlike dogs, this is what OP meant and we all know it. Cats will shit wherever they want, go wherever they want and whenever, use your face as a claw sharpener and than complain you don't feed them, unless that is you be a lil beta cuck and cater to all of your c(at)had's needs.

>>5104851
Red meat is not a carcinogen. You’re rambling like a schiozphrenic.

Red meat when fried black creates carcinogens. Curing meat introduces carcinogens. These are relevant statements.

“Red meat is a carcinogen” is a falsehood meant to polarize people. Also, big pharma is bad. Got a problem? Go pay $1k for an epi pen and watch your wifes fertility plummet after a gardasil shot fag (that will be $20k plus tip)

>>5104867
Speak english retardo

>>5104869
>Red meat is not a carcinogen. You’re rambling like a schiozphrenic.
red meat is a class 2a carcinogen according to the WHO, and class 1 if we include processed red meat. now please go ahead and shit your pants because I cited the WHO.
>Got a problem? Go pay $1k for an epi pen
yes price gouging drugs like insulin is bad, no argument there. I am saying that "big pharma" entities contribute a net positive to humanity. the alternative to big pharma is jeet tier unproven homeopathic garbage.

>>5104900
Now cite the WHO’s actual data. Its gen pop slop. Better yet, tell me the specific carcinogenic chemical. Protip: muscle tissue is not carcinogenic. Blackening it on a grill is. Fucking intestinal microabrasions from eating too many plants could be carcinogenic. Don’t be stupid.

They issued a political statement, not a medical one. These are the same people who advocate for alpha gal syndrome.

>>5104900
The WHO also advocates for the forceful circumcision of non-consenting male infants without anesthesia because a study of promiscuous african men found that circumcized africans were less likely to transmit and contract HIV and actively denies hard data showing permanent neurological damage and measurable unwanted temperamental changes.

>>5104900
>red meat is a class 2a carcinogen according to the WHO
how insanely dumb do you have to be to beleive WHO in current year. jesus christ.
they say its carcinogenic because it has some haemo iron which can be carcinogenic if you OD on it. yet they don't list anything else with haemo iron to be a carcinogen, eg sardines or liver, which have like 10x the amount.