>>10968620
If its an adult con who cares its the norm
If its a family con - yikes

>>10968624
Not 100% but that looks like the gazebo area at the Gaylord, which would make this either MAGfest or (more likely) Katsucon. So not for kids

>>10968620
could be wearing a tiny thong sewn into the skirt. you can get stick-on panties nowadays though.

off topic but i can't fucking stand when cosplayers don't cover their trashy tattoos. concealer is 10 dollars

>>10968620
she's hot, that's why she's confident. you wouldn't understand

>>10968620
I think the word you're looking for is shameless, not confident

>>10968627
then it's alright imo, as long as there's no kids around it's fair game to me

>>10968620
You don't wear shit like that unless you're an exhibitionist, she's basically gooning by wearing that.

>tattoos
There's your answer. Poor impulse control and lack of judgment

>>10968620
Some women are openly, shamelessly slutty.

So much care put into that wig to then ruin it all with the tattoos. I can't understand people like this.

>>10968620
She probably fucked like 20 other guys in that con, so walking around commando is not an issue.

>>10968701
Nah, as somebody who's been in and around the cosplay scene for decades, there's almost a direct inverse relationship between how slutty a cosplayer looks and how slutty she actually is. Chances are she's got a BF just out of shot and he's the only one that actually gets to fuck her.

>>10968710
however, a lot of cosplayers are models too, and almost always have a million naked photos always taken by men on their page framed as a "boudoir shoot"

>>10968620
Could be a C-String, but more than likely, considering this is hugely off-model cosplay, she is an e-thot doing this to promote her brand/get off on exhibitionism. The risk of staff kicking her out probably turns her on more than the costume itself.

>>10968710
Foh sho, she's totally monogamous, bro/sis.

>>10968715
There's a lot of that yeah, but that's different from actually sleeping around, and I've known a bunch of girls who wore super slutty cosplays at cons but didn't have anything online that was any more explicit than that.

>>10968723
>get off on exhibitionism. The risk of staff kicking her out probably turns her on more than the costume itself.
Basically this, I've known a bunch of cosplayers who fit into this category, some who barely even had online presences. Always wished I could get me one of those but they were always in committed relationships and most probably would never have had the courage to do it if they weren't.