Yea they should come with a warning with how addicting they are.

>>21982757
*addictive

>>21982754
fat

>>21982754
>fat hands

File: IMG_7959.jpg (472.2 KB)

472.2 KB JPG

It’s a Google image search result you obnoxious faggots I just want to discuss how much these rings suck.

>>21982754
why?
they're literally onion rings.

>>21982797
>these rings suck
when?
even if they've been under the heat lamp for 2 hours they're still good.

>>21982809
They’re all sickly sweet batter and no onion.

>>21982813
>sickly sweet batter and no onion
when?
they are filled with onion and the batter is mostly flavorless.

>>21982813
Did you even dip them??

>>21982814
They're not filling with onion you fat cunt

>>21982819
>They're not filling with onion
anon, they are filled with onion.
i'm sorry you didn't know this.

File: IMG_7960.jpg (867.7 KB)

867.7 KB JPG

>>21982824
Where is the onion?

File: Screenshot 2026-04-19 102542.png (94.9 KB)

94.9 KB PNG

>>21982827
right there as the filling.

File: IMG_7962.jpg (21.2 KB)

21.2 KB JPG

>>21982831
That’s not onion.

>>21982836
it is.
i'm sorry you can't into onion.

>>21982841
Hmm… No, I don’t think that’s onion.

>>21982846
>I don’t think that’s onion
well it's a good thing we don't base facts off of what you think.

>>21982849
I’m basically the smartest person on earth, so everything I think is a fact.

File: 73245234265234.png (554.5 KB)

554.5 KB PNG

>>21982831
>>21982836
>>21982827
this does make me think though
would pulverizing an onion into a sudio paste and then mixing it with a batter then frying it still make an onion ring?

Well, they're shaped like rings and they do contain some onion.

>>21982852
It would probably be too wet unless you mixed it with flour or starch or something, which is exactly what BK does.

>>21982831
That's not onion

>>21982850
your lack of ability to detect onion proves you wrong, again.
>>21982852
it would.

>>21982857
that's onion.

>>21982859
I don’t detect onion in the Burger King onion rings because there isn’t any.

>>21982861
That’s not onion

>>21982863
you don't detect it because you don't know what onion is.
>>21982865
that's 100% onion.
nothing but onion.
full onion, no substitutes.

>>21982872
Oh. I guess I don’t know what onion is. Ok. You can stop posting in this thread now. For everybody else, why isn’t there any onion?

>>21982879
Because it's cheaper to not fill them with onion. People still buy them or they'd change the recipe.

>>21982879
>You can stop posting in this thread now
tits or gtfo.

>>21982883
breading costs more than onion.
it would be cheaper to not bread them.
they contain onion.

>>21982884
Gayest poster today? Gotta be close

>>21982886
They don’t contain onion.

>>21982886
Source?

>>21982890
they do.
>>21982887
those aren't tits, femanon.

>>21982893
They don’t.

>>21982892
cost of breading, cost of onion.
look it up.

>>21982895
I’m not going to look it up.

>>21982895
Citation required.

>>21982852
Sounds like the kind of bullshit Cook's Illustrated would pull trying to get the most onion flavor out of their onion rings so they used this one weird trick in the test kitchen that involves caramelizing onions for 45 minutes before blending them into a paste and mixing them with dried onion flakes before mixing it all into the batter, and then dipping whole raw onion rings into the caramelized onion batter to deep fry, and then dipping them in a sour cream and chive sauce.

>>21982896
your loss.
>>21982898
that's your job.
burden of proof is on the library called "the internet".
go searching.

>>21982909
Evidence?

Hey everybody. I just wanted to give a quick update. I checked again and I can confirm, there’s no onion.

>>21982911
see

although i'm glad you're admitting your loss of this insane argument you attempted to have.
once we rid the world of people that are shit at trolling we will finally have peace.

>>21982917
OK. But where's your proof exactly? I've been scanning and scanning, but I cannot see your proof

>>21982926
>your proof
it's the internet's proof.

>>21982917
That’s a different guy. There’s no onions in the Burger King onion rings.

>>21982930
you're still shit at trolling, dnd sucks, anime is for fags, and bk onion rings contain onion.

>>21982931
I don’t know about those not food and cooking related things. There’s no onions in Burger King onion rings.

>>21982928
I see. You have no proof. Please retract your sweeping statement.

>>21982937
Stop talking to him. I’m talking to him and we are busy.

File: Screenshot 2026-04-19 112819.png (116.6 KB)

116.6 KB PNG

>>21982937
>You have no proof.
not my job to look up the evidence you need that is available with a google search, but since you're a dolt:
>breading - $0.08 an ounce
>onion - $0.04 an ounce
it would be cheaper for them to contain onion, that's why they do.
i'm sorry your palette and eyes are dogshit.

>>21982949
That’s fake. You used Photoshop.

>>21982949
>palette
Oh dear.

>>21982956
oh, no! a typo.
proofreading internet posts is pointless, anon.
please get on the train instead of being afraid of it.

>>21982960
Posting fake screenshots with fake ingredients is also pointless.

>>21982962
like when these weirdo fucks post anime "girls"?

>>21982963
I don’t know anything about that I only know food and cooking. There’s no onions in Burger King onion rings.

>>21982949
Citation required

>>21982970
It’s fake.

>>21982966
if you know food, why don't you know onions?
are you claiming onions are not food?

>>21982974
There are no onions in Burger King onion rings.

>>21982976
>>21982807

>>21982981
Burger King is lying and should be sued. There are no onions in Burger King onion rings.

>>21982985
>Burger King is lying and should be sued
let me know when you get that check, anon.

>>21982994
I said they should be sued not that I’m suing them. Burger King onion rings have no onions in them.

>>21982996
>I said they should be sued not that I’m suing them
oh, complaint without action.
tits or gtfo.

Burger King onion rings have no onions in them.

The autism in this thread is fascinating

>>21983033
I wanted a normal thread of hating on these fucking rings but some autie ruined it for me.

>>21983037
misplaced hate for something so fucking delicious, anon.
learn thy lesson.

>>21983042
There’s no onions in Burger King onion rings.

>>21983037
Yeah agree, onion ring from BK do suck ass, the batter has a weird taste To be fair I don't any fast food joint has good onion rings

>>21982797
>so fat he is afraid to post his own hands

Found OP, hes a bitch and serial BK hater

https://youtu.be/njxBjmmBAQQ

>>21983131
>I'mmmmmm screeeeeeamingggggg

>>21982754
Nuttin wrong with onion paste

>>21983052
If he posted his hands, people would criticize it. If he doesn't, people criticize not posting them. Your insults would be better if they weren't so transparently contrarian

>>21983172
I could have posted the onion rings wrapped around my dick.

>>21983174
The hole is small enough, but you could probably only get 3 on there

File: IMG_2572.gif (1022.6 KB)

1022.6 KB GIF

>>21983176
lmao felted

File: Screenshot_20260419_152155_Chrome.jpg (629.6 KB)

629.6 KB JPG

I've never had them but looked this up and was surprised, indeed it's just a ring of onion flavored batter, not sliced rings of onions that have been battered which is what virtually everyone else calls an onion ring. Kind of baffling, but seems on point given how terrible all their other food is.

>>21983226
Fuck off schizo.

>>21983237
Google it yourself. I have to stake in this other than curiosity, haven't been to a burger king in at least a decade and don't care for onion rings at the best of timrs but this ingredients list made me curious. >>21982949 the description their own site gives is that their onion rings have a signature uniform shape and size which you obviously don't get with sliced battered onions so it looks like that's indeed the case. Seems weird that they'd do that but their food is disgusting in general so it's really not that shocking.

>>21982754
we called them "pre-chewed" onion rings.

>>21982807
no they are not. they are ground up onions formed in to rings. they are not very good.

>>21982883
>People still buy them or they'd change the recipe.
I stopped ordering them shortly after they came out in the late 80's.

>>21983545
also known as "baby bird style" 'round these here parts *snaps suspenders*

File: both pretty.jpg (74.8 KB)

74.8 KB JPG

>>21982974
>>21982976

>>21982754
I sometimes use crispy onion toppers on pasta and even those are better. This shit? Its like Air Fried dough. Jack in the Box rings are even worse

>>21983131
>i ordered buffalo wings and you gave me chicken

>>21983226
I used to think Jack in the Box tacos were made from leftover patty meat. We should be so lucky. Imagine my shock to find out its a squirt of soybean paste and a slice of american cheese

>>21983763
>Jack in the Box rings are even worse
JITB is the OG GOAT.

>>21983783
it's ground beef and beans.

>>21983780
who was in the wrong?

>still going this prick

BK onion rings are amazing. Every other shitty fast food onion ring sucks dick because the breading sloughs off and you're left with a slimy ring with no breading after taking one bite. BK are genious mixing chunks of onion with the breading so no matter what kind of bite you take you're getting batter and onion and no slimy mess. I wish all onion rings could be so based but sadly we live in a fallen world.

>>21982754
Jesus OP when's the last time your skin saw the sun?

File: onion-rings.jpg (120 KB)

120 KB JPG

>>21982754
Here in Hungry Jack's (Australian Burger King) the onion rings they fry are actually made of onion. Sorry you're being served barely edible FDA approved goyslop.

File: 1765735401920832.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

>>21982754
>It should be illegal for Burger King to call these
tacos

File: 1763136752882609.png (472 KB)

472 KB PNG

>>21982754
burger king "onion" rings are unironically better than real onion rings.

I had Applebees Onion Rings recently and they use the stringiest wettest limpist part of the onion

File: Outback-Steakhouse-Bloomin-Onion.jpg (356.6 KB)

356.6 KB JPG

MOGGS YOU

File: IMG_6932.jpg (40.6 KB)

40.6 KB JPG

>>21983973
For me its these BBQ Onion Tanglers. Like a lot of Bar-B-Que places have these things and they slap. And they reheat better than the Onion Bloom

>>21983940
If you go to Burger King and buy tacos, you get what you deserve.

>>21983982
Yet going to Taco Bell for a pizza is a-ok

>>21983984
If you go to Taco Bell and buy a pizza, you get what you deserve.

>>21983987
I got the nuggets at taco bell and they were good.

>>21983989
nuggets are ubiquitous

>>21983979
>they slap
Contact the police

>>21983992
Okay what about going to a steakhouse and getting a salad?

>>21983993
No. I don't want to share

>>21983993
Im no bitch chef

>>21983995
>going to a steakhouse and getting a salad?
That is perfectly normal behavior for a woman.

>>21984000
Who the fuck doesnt get the table side Caesar?

>>21984003
Every single person with a functioning pair of testicles.

>>21982754
that is one really fat hand like how did you even accomplish this it must have taken some effort

>>21984005
You sound like the worst person to eat with with, guy.

File: rr.jpg (58.6 KB)

58.6 KB JPG

Red Robin to the rescue.

>>21982754
I want a law like Japan has where the fast food restaurant has to make it look like the picture.

>>21983548
>no they are not
>they are ground up onions formed in to rings
pick one.

>>21983226
>using ai's answer
Retard.

>>21984005
Based.

>>21985114
Moron

File: stop my penis.gif (235.7 KB)

235.7 KB GIF

>>21983851
>you're left with a slimy ring with no breading after taking one bite
yeah an actual onion.

>>21983940
would

>>21984994
my statement stands.

>>21982754
>Has onion
>is ring
I don't see the problem

>>21985830
Nobody asked

>>21983940
>>21983982
During the brief time they had these, they were pretty great to get like 2 for $2. They tasted deep fried and greasy but were good.

>>21983226
Notthat this isn't accurate but I hate we're getting unironic AI citations now

>>21985112
>>21985863
Looking at the ingredients list and their own website touting that one of the special features of their onion rings is that they're all the same shape and size, what do you think is inaccurate in the description I posted? I've never had a BK onion ring, but it seems pretty clear by all information available that it's not a slice of onion covered in batter, it's a batter made with minced onions formed into the shape of a ring. Are you saying that's not the case? And if so, can you point to any valid information that supports the claim?

>>21982754
They're deep fried, battered onion rings.
Why would they not be called onion rings?

>>21986241
Because to most people, an onion ring refers to sliced onions which come naturally as rings that then get coated in batter and fried. The Burger King ones are technically onion rings in that they are ring shaped and have onion in them, but it's a fundamentally different thing than what the term refers to. It's a little like if they changed their hamburgers from being a beef patty on a bun into a slice of ham on a bun and expect everyone to pretend it's the same thing because technically it's a ham-burger.

>>21986281
Nobody cares

File: IMG_6893.jpg (200.7 KB)

200.7 KB JPG

>>21986306
I care bitch. Bet you're one of those faggots who prefers meat based substances over plain meat.

>>21982852
No, it'd be a a hush puppy or somesuch

An onion ring is cut onion.
Not refried paste.
Ergo, not an onion ring.

>>21982903
Right. Niggerized onion.
Not onion.

>>21983168
It's not onion though

>>21986306
I also care, an onion ring has a ring of onion in it, not onion mush

>>21982831
Those are quite literally holes
Air =/= onion

My onion rings cannot be solid rings, because onions are never solid rings
This shit . might as well be a patty.

>>21986281
The thing you are describing, pining for, it's called a "standard of identity." Many food items have one, Google it if you like. Unfortunately, there isn't an official USDA standard of identity for onion rings, or if there is, then these fall within it. Whining won't help, it just makes you look ignorant and juvenile... which explains why you're here I guess.

>>21983973
>onion ring but bigger
not impressed

>>21982883
You do realize how many rings you can make from one onion, right? Removing the onion and making it entirely out of breading would be even more expensive.

>>21987430
I'm not pining for anything, I don't even like onion rings. Just understanding how if someone ordered onion rings from a place they would have a reasonable expectation that what they would get is what's commonly understood as an onion ring. I'm only here out of curiosity, it seemed odd Burger King would sell ring shaped onion flavored dough as onion rings and looked it up and was surprised that is indeed what they are. I've probably only ever eaten at Burger King half a dozen times at most and their burgers were disgusting even by fast food standards, but I still found it surprising to find what they call onion rings are just a dough infused with onion extruded in the shape of a ring.

Were they always batter? I swear I recall eating them decades ago and it was actual onion rings

>>21987700
I was in internet mode, apologies. I have a little knowledge about how companies name things, what tricks they play to avoid legal issues with ingredients, etc. It wouldn't surprise me to eventually hear that someone has filed a lawsuit about this issue. I just googled it myself, there's no standard of identity, but according to the FDA if they're made with diced or dehydrated onions that has to be called out in the labeling. That's probably why they use the totally ground/pureed ones.

I love getting an onion ring in my fries

>>21988012
Note: your repentance doesn't absolve you from being a cunt. You're tainted. And a shitlord.

>>21982754
It should be illegal for me to fuck your mother, but I do it anyway.

>>21982754
I ordered some last time I was in and they were the most revolting fast food item I've suffered through. Threw out a near full box.