IIRC there are some ARG elements

>>152673684
Tynion is one of those writers no one should ever read.

>>152673684
It's interesting but I feel like he's about to drop the ball massively.

>>152673684
>>152675284
Getting filtered by gay chars is more gay than enjoying the gay chars desu please step a few feet outside of the closet

>>152673684
Tynion is gay himself so what were you expecting?

A modern writer being able to not represent / reference his own gender identity in his every work? You fool.

>>152673684
More importantly: can I masturbate to the naked lady's big boobas or is she / xer always covered in shadows?

>>152676254

every. single. character. besides the black dude, is mega fucking gay. yoshi talks about his fantasy of a whole bunch of muscle guys railing eachother in one of the first volumes out of nowwhere.

>>152676254

inversely, do you think it would be appropriate for a sci-fi(ish) comic where every character is talking about fucking some female counterpart? yeah tyrion is gay, but to have it not only interspersed, but be the defining feature of a book just feels gross.

>>152676686
>appropriate
No
>do I wish it would happen
YES

>>152673684
>gay writer makes a comic featuring gay characters
what a shocker

File: 1468845844121.png (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB PNG

>>152673684
Is that girl on the floor gonna be all right... ?

>>152673684
sounds awesome

>>152673684
style over substance and the first few issues had already peaked

>>152676240
I get filtered by the awful writing.

>>152677639
She just needs a couple bandages is all

>>152678346
OOF

>>152677657
not really

>>152675284
Who else?

>>152673684
>w0rldtr33
Haha, I get it! The 0 is taking the place of the letter 'O,' and the 33 is taking the place of two 'E's.

>>152681483
Oh wow. That pretty clever.

are any of tynion's comics actually good?

it all comes across as sleek, wannabe-Buffy style-over-substance horror pitches for Netflix that are actually always about being a queer teenage boy.

what about the Memetic trilogy? Let This One Be a Devil? Blue Book/Red Book?

Clive Barker was more subtle than this.

>>152680831
Tom King
Tom Taylor
Dan Slott
Brian Michael Bendis
Matt Fraction
Scott Snyder
Jason Aaron
Mark Millar
any American female

>>152682591
>any American female
lighten up francis

Nocenti, Weezy Simonson, Nancy Collins
Gail is overhated. Kelly Thompson is doing good stuff on AWW

>>152682653
Yeah, avoid all of those. You're better off.

>>152682670
you're trying too hard

>>152682709
I'm not trying anything. I haven't enjoyed anything those girls have written, not even close.

>>152678346
That doesn't mean anything to anyone when you base the quality of writing entirely on how many gay people exist in it... can you at least come up with a reasonable issue with the writing? Other than "horny gay guys make me uncomfortable"? There's also a hot (depending on your preference I guess) naked broad in almost every issue, it's not like there is no service to heterosexual people. It's not "genre" queer it just has gay people in it. Jesus I keep seeing you /pol/ shits in all my other boards lately, are tyrannical jews not keeping you fags busy enough??

>>152682653
Hello good taste haver, we oughta have our own comics board for people who actually like comics

>>152673684
He pulled this shit in department of truth too, very disappointing

>>152682871

.it's not like there is no service to heterosexual people

I'm not looking for any overdone writing about anyone's sexuality. I would rather a writer prioritize the character's normal interests and background + overall story first, without prioritizing their sexual interests over that. It's distracting, the fact that you have to defend it is proof enough that it's overdone.

>>152683492

whoops, meant to green text that first sentence >>152682871 to quote you.

>>152682898
Do you actually like comics, or do you like IPs and maintaining a nerd cred? Also, I'd be right there with you because I actually like comics. I just like less of them because I'm a massive snob.

>>152683492
My point is that you only think it is overdone because you are fixating on it. It's not an abnormal amount of sex for a comment with a naked lady on the cover. If you can't tolerate the reference or use of more mature themes, ie sex, then go back to normie cape shit. It is normal for characters to talk about sex, including gay ones. It is human.

>>152683556
I love reading. I don't have any nerd cred to maintain I just like reading dark stuff. The only IPs I really care about are some of the street level marvel characters like Daredevil and Punisher, but those aren't even like my favorite books, they have plenty of dog shit runs.
I mostly read non big three.
This place sucks because most people here don't like reading comics and we share it with 13 year old cartoon watchers that have the attention span that only lasts the duration of half a tik tok videos and people that are obsessed with culture war shit. Every fucking board on 4chan has turned to /pol/ now and it sucks.

>>152683684
*comic not comment fuck I hate being retarded

>>152682740
That's a You problem

>>152682591
Slott, Bendis, Snyder, and Millar have all written at least one good comic each in the past and saying 'never read anything by these guys' would be a disservice. Like Loeb they have not made anything of value in a long time but, also like Loeb, they have done very good work back in the day.
King did Batman/Fudd which I fully believe was ghost written because it is the best comic I read that decade.

I haven't read any Fraction but I heard his work on Iron Man was alright way back in the day. What did he do that was terrible?

>>152684292
>Slott, Bendis, Snyder, and Millar have all written at least one good comic each in the past
No.
I excluded Loeb for a reason.
Batman/Elmer Fudd is garbage and as bad as anything else he shat out that isn't Batman or Heroes in Crisis. I really don't understand why people pick this out of all the other crap.
>What did he do that was terrible?
Everything he writes has this cheesy, unfunny edge to it, which started with writers like Bendis.

>>152684431
>Everything he writes has this cheesy, unfunny edge to it, which started with writers like Bendis.

Not Ennis?

>>152685472
No. Ennis has a different brand of crassness, based on that of Pat Mills and other Brits.