Thread #11474093
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
A thread to post futas of small/below-average size. The smaller the better.
+Showing all 198 replies.
>>
>>11474093
post six you fucking retard
>>
dumbass OP doesn't know to post more than 1 fucking image
>>
>>11474171
posting a plastic nub in a small penis thread is worse imo
>>
>>
>>
File: 011.jpg (423 KB)
423 KB
423 KB JPG
>>
>>11474177
That's a metal cage
Supposedly they shrink the penis, but even if they didn't, they keep it small.
>>
>>
>>
>>11474275
i tried really had to think of an analogy, but i can't. but i personally do not think that a plastic (or metal) nub is equal to a dick. even in a small dick thread where you can say "there is a small dick in there", you still posted a metal (or plastic) nub, not a dick. plus flaccid dicks are conventionally small anyway, so colloquially you don't actually have a small dick if you're only small when flaccid. so a plastic (or metal) nub being two steps removed from a definitively (erect) small dick seems like a stretch imo. but if you believe otherwise, more power to you
>>
I love it when they prejac
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Alternate version of the pic I posted a while ago. Still a cute little prejac
>>
>>
>>11475219
>>11475223
>>11475224
>>11475236
>>11475237
>>11475241
>>11475523
Not a futa.
>>
>>
File: RollUp.jpg (2 MB)
2 MB
2 MB JPG
>>
File: shrimp.jpg (65.4 KB)
65.4 KB
65.4 KB JPG
>>
>>11475604
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>11475604
thanks for pointing out the good ones
>>
>>11476872
He is just bitching about problem that doesn't exist, no one cares about dictionary definition of word "futa"... does it look like a chick? does it have a dick? that's all that matters.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>11476872
Shitposting faggot.
>>11477020
Smoothbrain faggot.

Why had /d/ been overrun with transvestite obsessed faggots?
>>
>>11477025
>>11477050
>>11477054
>>11477055
>>11477057
>>11477058
Not a futa.
>>
File: IMG_8014.jpg (714.7 KB)
714.7 KB
714.7 KB JPG
>>11477499
because 2016 happened and the OG userbase has been drowned out by shit posting faggots like you
>>
>>11477502
>anon calls out offtopic shitposts
>This is somehow shitposting
>meanwhile self identified electionfaggot keeps posting images of men in a futanari thread.
Are you even self aware?
>>
>>11477503
Have you ever saw how a man looks like? pretty girl characters with flat chests and cocks are not men, you dumb faggot, if you draw a female with penis are tits the only thing that visually decides if its trap or futa? either way you are drawing women with male genitalia, they are not men. kys faggot.
>>
>>11477519
Why would a flat chested girl be considered a trap, its equally valid to say its a futanari (flat chested girls exist too you know) also no one gives a fuck about your boomer futanari shit where a woman has vagina and cock instead of clitoris, go to R34 or any other porn site for hentai images, no one makes that shit for long time now, everyone draws futas as women with male genitalia.
>>
>>
>>11477503
>illiterate electiontard mistakes me for his own kind
>does not comprehend the shitpost vs shit post distinction
>does not understand the difference between off topic and on topic
leave your house and get some dick. your brain needs sunlight to make neurotransmitters.
>>
>>
>>
>>11477048
Artist name? This stuff seems very familiar looking. Did they also do some exhibitionist comics with one being a small futanari getting exposed at a pool etc?
>>
>>11477671
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/59827267

たけのこ on Pixiv
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Putting the technical definition of futa re:genitals aside, a large chunk of this thread isn't even any sort of dickgirl at all. For example, >>11477058 and >>11477032 and several others are just traps, >>11477055 and >>11477057 and more are just dudes complete with male musculature and no breasts at all and aren't even crossdressing, and >>11477039 includes text specifying it's trans and not "futa_without_pussy". This thread is a travesty.
>>
>>11477946
Well, I guess trans is still technically dickgirl actually but it's definitely not what anyone looking for "futa" is looking for, whatever their definition is. Also holy shit gookmoot tone down your spam filters, I had to cut down half the postref links in this in order for 4chan to stop calling it spam and let it through.
>>
>>11477946
Why are you a faggot?
>>
>>11477949
When I was a teen discovering that my dick wasn't just for peeing, I went online and found drawings of girls with penises, and it turned out I liked it. It took a while to come to terms with how gay that is. Maybe you'll come to terms with it as well someday.
>>
i find it hilarious that the fact that a bunch of oldfags deciding to make futa real here in the early 2010s has utterly destableised the category of futanari

how big do the tits need to be?
is a vag strictly required?
how much does curviness matter?
what even is the difference between a twink, a trap, a tranny, a futa?
>>
>>11477050
>>11477054
>>11477055
>>11477056
>>11477057
These are literally just males drawn by artists that specifically only draw only feminized males.
>>
>>11478088
>vag strictly required
Futa have female egg cell, so yes.
>>11477931
Tifuta Cockhart has bigger dick
>>
>>11478262
>Futa have female egg cell, so yes.
traditionally yes
when in the last 15 years has that definition been popular, however? newhalf became practically synonymous with futanari over a decade ago.
>>
>>
>>
File: 03.jpg (180.9 KB)
180.9 KB
180.9 KB JPG
This one is a bit cheating as she's average when erect.
>>
>>11478088
A futanari requires a female body, a pussy, and a dick, balls optional. Breast size is not relevant but large ones are nice. They are a fictional third sex, they can get pregnant and give live vaginal birth, can produce milk, and can impregnate women or other futanari.
Anything else. dickgirl, twink, trap, etc is mental gymnastics for being into transvestites and men.
>>
>>11478400
this is all well and good, but in practice who actually agrees with you? it seems like this position has largely been abandoned.
>>
>>11478400
Back to 2003 boomer
>>
>>11478406
>this is all well and good, but in practice who actually agrees with you?
People with taste.
> it seems like this position has largely been abandoned.
Only by faggots like >>11478416
>>
>>11478417
you keep saying this, but go browse the tags on any booru and see how many people share your opinion where it counts
>>
>>11478417
More masculine gay men hentai, just to offend you
>>
>>11478417
Hypermasculine Gigachad that's gonna impregnate all of your anime waifus
>>
>>
>>11478323
>newhalf became practically synonymous with futanari over a decade ago
Which totally a misconception
>>
>>11478434
>>
>>11478452
which everyone seems to be ok with
>>
>>11478535
Only in your tranny discord
>>
>>11477946
fyi a dickgirl is further from a futa than a trap is, the key characteristic of course being balls.
>>
>>11478543
no, electiontard, on the boorus
>>
>>11478578
The main "booru" I use has distinct differences between hermaphrodites and gynomorphs
Blow it out of your ass tranny
>>
>>11478580
why the fuck are you putting booru in quotes you faggot election tourist? and why are you avoiding using the term "futanari" specifically?
>>
>>11478587
Because it's western, and fully in english, including the tagging.
Hermaphrodite = Futanari however, you stupid faggot.
>>
I actually love futas with more modest cocks like this thread.
>>
>>11478607
my brother in christ, nobody gives a shit about your whining. post or don't, but your pathetic little semantics game are boring and taking up space
>>
>>11478607
yes, but who actually cares? who of those who are actually using the term "futanari", which is not identical to its translation however you want to spin it due to the conscious decision to use the japanese term instead of the western term, actually care?
>>
>>11478427
>where it counts
Boorus are the shittiest source you can get. It's just retards tagging however they feel like. Look at pixiv, where most of the art comes from and see how they tag things correctly for the most part. Well the japanese on pixiv. Garbage by westerners is tagged wrong and often gets flagged for it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>11478876
Yes.
>>11478878
No.
>>
>>
>>11478845
i should check that, i havent used pixiv in years and years and years
>>
>>11478853
>>11478858
Not a futa.
>>
Can anyone rec any artists like Mofuriru (もふりる) who draws a lot of this kind of stuff?

>>11479270
Give up, nearly every image named 'female penis XX' is either shemale or trap, they clearly don't care what it says in OP.
Really the first thing you should be complaining about is the rule breaking western art.
>>
>>11479743
Never give up, never surrender. If enough of us keep pushing back the faggots will leave. I report posts for western slop or off topic however the rules say you can't state you're reporting a post.
>>
>>11479270
>>11479748
>10 years of being largely ignored by artists both western and japanese
>nvr surrendr
god bless you
>>
>>11479748
>no fun allow
Mega cringe
>>
>>11479743
Mofu is one of the best : I love that the big fighter girl from Fuuju Hime has a cute cock.

Namusoubyou >>11478371 does a lot of small ones.
>>
>>
>>11478859
source? i know the artist but cant find the rest of this uncensored and translated
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>11480252
Go be a faggot somewhere else.
>>
>>11480345
Not a futa.
>>
Every time I think this thread might be allowed to fade away, this same one guy comes in to post a batch of pics and pushes it back to the front page right as I visit. At least this most recent batch isn't shoving asshole and taint in my face. Oh well, while I'm here...
>>11479770
>10 years of being largely ignored by artists both western
Yes.
>and japanese
No. I'm not going to argue that there aren't any JP artists who ignore pussy when drawing futa, but they're few and far between, and some, such as itami/hibon, have actually started to more clearly draw the vag there where previously they wouldn't, and there are some cases (i.e. https://e-hentai.org/s/8070a20dfc/3053491-2 ) where "dickgirl" has been adopted by JP artists to describe the "futa without pussy" type (seriously, the raw says 「ディックガール」 there). Then of course there's Yana/nekoarashi, who's made whole illustrated guides about the technical differences between the types of feminine-person-with-a-penis that exist in hentai. If anything, JP artists are listening and have agreed that there's a clear need for well defined categories to cater to different tastes.
>>
>>11480576
>be a faggot somewhere else.
/u/ in nutshell
>>
>>11480577
>>
>>11480348
Pixiv artist: 3671749
>>
>>11480348
Search r34 for artist:
shirokuma_(nankyoku)
>>
>>11480867
>>11480865
Like I said I found the original, was wondering about this translation/decensor.
>>
>>11480588
the fact that you keep coming back to get upset at this is hilarious to me

i went and scrolled pixiv to see if you were right and artists are now insisting on futanari with vaginas, but the majority of the art on there seems to not show the presence of a vagina at all. are you headcanoning these vaginas into existence?

Reply to Thread #11474093


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)