Thread #18650323
File: sideburns.gif (13.6 KB)
13.6 KB GIF
Which length do you most like sideburns? Why do you prefer it?
20 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_7330.jpg (739 KB)
739 KB JPG
Go all the way
>>
File: 2655783866.jpg (38.4 KB)
38.4 KB JPG
>>18650323
Anything less than "long" in that pic is cucked. Your sideburns should reach at least the middle of your ears, because that's where your sideburns end and your beard begins. When you were a kid you could grow side burns up to that point. To grow facial hair below that you had to wait till you hit puberty and grow a beard. So that's the natural length of sideburns.
>>
>>
File: Zygomatic_process_of_temporal_bone_-_lateral_view.png (80.8 KB)
80.8 KB PNG
>>18650323
The only right answer is using the zygomatic process of the temporal bone as a guide (middle of it)
>>
>>
File: burns.jpg (124.2 KB)
124.2 KB JPG
>>18650323
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1000033627.jpg (60.9 KB)
60.9 KB JPG
go big or go home
>>
>>
>>
File: 1752889803827363.png (520.1 KB)
520.1 KB PNG
>>18650323
'nulty GODS
>>
>>
>>
>>18650323
I usually have mine at any of the ones called long and extra-long, or something in-between. These were probably considered long and extra-long between the two World Wars and into the 1950s, but they don't look that particularly long to me. Extra-extra long would be full earlobe length, wouldn't it?