Thread #108267387
File: stop.png (212.3 KB)
212.3 KB PNG
sam just got another $110 billion
60 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
You know how no one wants a party to end since they're all going to be waking up with a massive hangover and the task of cleaning up? Well, this is the Jack Daniel Distillery personally sending a truck to your address every single day to keep it going.
Also they're charging your father's debit card.
>>
File: 1761957225634160.png (1.6 MB)
1.6 MB PNG
>>108267387
>>
>>
They will give him a money printer to take home if he builds killer robots for israe-I mean the use government.
Debt and spending will be meaningless once the killer robot dogs with top mounted machineguns roam gaza
>>
>>
File: 1747822227678631.png (228.4 KB)
228.4 KB PNG
>>108267387
Of course it won’t pop. Who’s going to clear the ticket while you guys are off at dessert?
>>
>>
We still have more places to go. Right now you have the Mamba enthusiasts saying they'll solve every problem with state space models this year and you'll get to spit out an alzheimer's 3 hour feature film for the compute cost of a 10 second seedance clip, and on the other side you have neuromorphic fans saying they'll solve every problem with neuromorphic computing this year and you'll be able to crunch a trillion parameter transformer onto a chip the size of an SD card that can run on a AAA battery, that can also learn in real time.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: dick in bush.jpg (19.8 KB)
19.8 KB JPG
>>108267387
he's being bankrolled by the US taxpayer now, who still have to pay for chatGPT anyway
>>
>>108267387
I'm a NoTech retard, can someone give me the truth about AI, will it replace jobs, like really in scale, mass layoffs of programmers and coders, and other white collar professions, will it replace doctors
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1472141190.jpg (91.6 KB)
91.6 KB JPG
>>108267387
Is he going to buy a 3rd Mclaren F1?
>>
>>108267387
It's popping.
Sam never gets cash, when they report on those numbers, they fail to mention that they always mean they are about "cloud credits". That is, he is given such and such compute capability on Azure/AWS/... free of charge.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108268791
>will it replace jobs
yes
>like really in scale
yes but slowly
>mass layoffs of programmers and coders
mass layoffs because of ai are more of an excuse for now. the job market for coders will just keep getting worse as companies don't need to hire as much as before
>other white collar professions
not yet
>replace doctors
no
>>
>>108268791
software companies are going to lay off a bunch of people and then need to hire a bunch of them back as their codebase stability deteriorates from AI slop.
what AI can code is stuff that can fit in a single file. it's terrible at the system level.
don't buy the hype, the loudest shills are the same people who pushed crypto and web 3.0. they just want somebody else holding the bag before this bubble pops.
LLMs are a dead end for AGI and they hit a hard barrier in late 2024. scale won't fix it, but the hyperscalers literally don't know how to do anything else.
>>
>>108267387
Do you not understand how this works? Early investors are clambering to get in before the IPO where they cash out and let all the other retards hold the bag in a collapsing scam. Nobody is investing based on a belief in the company, they are doing so with assurances that the company will go public in the near future.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108268890
around 10 000
none of them succeeded so far.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108268791
Yes, they will replace every job in 18 months and cure cancer within 5 years before eventually birthing ASI within 10 years. Btw, have you ever heard of NFTs? I'm looking to sell a few valuable ones to intelligent buyers.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108268791
>will it replace jobs
Yes, but no one is actually savvy enough to know WHAT jobs will be replaced. Most jobs that will be replaced will be tedious jobs that require repetition and pattern recognition, and even then new jobs will open up for "supervisors" to ensure that no error is being made. In short, in reality it'll be a nothingburger and there will be new jobs created to actually tardwrangle AIs.
>like really in scale
Absolutely not
>mass layoffs of programmers and coders
Yes, but because of the incompetence of companies, not AI. All the companies that do so will end up with egg on their face compared to the companies that adapted and figured out how to integrate AI in a long-term and smart way that doesn't involve mass-layoffs of all their useful employees compared to the ones that fall for the hype and just lay-off every single programmer and coder.
>will it replace doctors
No. It will assist doctors. In fact the field that has received the greatest benefit of AI has been medical science specifically because it's ability to be superior to humans in pattern recognition allowed for new breakthroughs in discovering and treating illnesses like cancer. Something that techbros should use as a win, but they don't because they are too busy jerking off on the whole "AI god singularity" thing.
Also to elaborate, AI is both a nothingburger and a massive game changer. All the hype about it leading to singularity and ascension is the nothingburger. All the hype about it replacing humanity is the nothingburger.
What is the actual game changer in the long-run is pretty much in academia and long-term research breakthroughs as well as streamlining logistics and removing a lot of bureaucracy (or alternatively streamlining bureaucracy). Pretty much boring stuff that benefits people but isn't actually interesting to investors or techbros.
Anyone comparing AI to automation and the luddite rebellion is a midwit who hasn't studied enough history.
>>
>>108272647
>>108274953
They make insane money on real estate. Tax churches along with the rest of the pedophiles
>>
>>108268791
>can someone give me the truth about AI?
Imagine enslaving black people again, but making it legal and ethical. That's why corporations are so fucking obsessed with the idea, once they pull it off there will be no valid arguments for it to be stopped.
>will it replace jobs
Yes, but we don't quite know the extent.
>like really in scale
Again, we don't quite know, if the job is a re-implementation of something that is already well documented and it requires simple robotics then yes, if it's purely software (aka it's own environment) then it's on it's way to replace a lot of workers.
>mass layoffs of programmers and coders
For slop proyects yes, for anything that requires novel problemsolving no. That's the thing, AI doesn't "reasons", it just uses memory and pattern recognition, the moment it stumbles upon a completely new kind of problem it will shit the bed.
Only the creme of the crop of devs and researchers will remain.
>and other white collar professions
If the human interaction is the core of the job then no. AI will not be taken kindly by the customers. And thus some clowns will try to make it work before decisively going bankrupt like the retards they are.
>will it replace doctors
AI showed to be promising as a second opinion because it's memory is flawless, it can easily remember that one off, obscure incident in a medical paper that happened years ago and that every doctor forgot because "there is no way he has that". But other than that, I doubt AI is ever going to be trusted with something like surgery or emergency care.
Tech investors really like the idea of making a nurse robot because of the nurse shortages in a ton of countries, it might come by but I don't know how well it'd be received.
>>
>>108268791
>will it replace jobs
some of them and its a good productivity tool. theres a bunch of jobs it will not replace in any meaningful way
>mass layoffs of programmers and coders
thats mostly happening because of the weird debt bubble pseudorecession we are in. if we werent running out of money and the consumer actually had money then we would have a real hiring boom to capitalize on the AI stuff.
>will it replace doctors
god i hope so, i genuinely think most of them here are more incompetent than chatgpt
>>
>>
>>108268791
Short version:
In its current form AI is a meme. The fact it still needs a human in the loop to make sure AI doesn't do egregious mistakes makes AI a meme and not enough to break the world economy as much as it's promised.
Long version:
Basically what happened is that they took a promising text predictor AI model and added a bunch of GPUs to it to make it much bigger and faster and they discovered the model was shockingly decent at making human-like conversations and writing code and answering questions like it's personified Google with a small chance of hallucinating random shit, and they were like "if just adding several GPUs made AI that smart, imagine what would happen if we added cities worth of GPUs, we would have a SuperAI after which whoever controls that SuperAI will literally make unprecedented amounts of money or even conquer the world".
In that promise investors threw AI companies billions, AI companies built those city-sized AI datacenters and to their shock they discovered the AIs didn't get much smarter. Sure they got kinda more accurate so it's slightly better as a personified Google, but it still does egregious mistakes which requires a human to check it doesn't fuck shit up, hence making AI a meme.
AI companies realized they've just been burning billions for minimal benefit and now they keep lying to investors to keep the money flowing, the bubble to stop from popping, the stock inclining, the economy from collapsing, while "in secret" they're hoping some genius AI researcher comes up with a magic solution that makes the AI make less mistakes and make it capable to be trusted to run things without human input.
>>