Thread #108273578
File: 1770838208766969.jpg (262.9 KB)
262.9 KB JPG
You dont need more than 240hz on a monitor.
40 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_20260301_190620.jpg (50.9 KB)
50.9 KB JPG
>>108273578
>240hz
meanwhile my crt literally runs at 31khz
>>
File: 1771886356313860.jpg (20.2 KB)
20.2 KB JPG
>>108273578
I like dual mode 4k 240h/1080p 480hz I use it for counter strike and
>>
File: 1753411510035167.png (143.4 KB)
143.4 KB PNG
>>108273578
>240hz
*75
>>
>>
>>108273809
valve did a study and it said 90hz is the minimum required refresh rate to prevent motion sickness when using vr. they also specifically use 90hz displays on the oled too and really anything below 90hz feels bad so it makes sense
>>
File: frogpursuit.jpg (778.3 KB)
778.3 KB JPG
>>108273831
There is an important thing about those 90 vr frames that almost everyone misses. 90hz is enough ONLY if it's using <1ms MPRT, or aka with BFI/ULMB techniques. That creates realistically clear motion while being fast enough to largely eliminate flicker.
Fun *technology connection* btw, guess what was the most common refresh rate for PC CRTs? 85hz.
>>
>>108273578
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sb_7uN7sfTw uhmm actually I need a 39620 hz monitor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
No I don't.
I have a 360hz monitor and sure, there's some difference there, but I can barely appreciate it.
I should have gone for a 4k 240hz instead of 1440p 360hz monitor.
It's not like I can play cybercrap at more than 150fps anyways
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: hunter-x-hunter-anime-girl.gif (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB GIF
>>108273578
We don't have hardware that is capable of stable 60Hz
>>
>>
>>
>>108273997
For desktop work CRT looked like ass at 60Hz back in the day. I remember all the fucking classrooms and public spaces with computers had them set to 60 (sometimes even 50 for some god forsaken reason) and I always went to the settings to set it to 85 Hz though in some rare cases the monitor did not support it. I dunno if flicker is the right word but closest I can think of for why 60 looked bad. Like it would make my eyes tired from looking at it. It was completely fine on TVs and such that played "fuzzier" content from a distance.
>>
>>108273997
Yep 85hz was the most common. 60hz was just eye rape.
I remember a few years later being bothered about emulation, tearing and sound crackling in regards to the refresh rate of the fucking monitor. Good lord. RetroArch saved me from that hell that long ago.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: HCM8jXNaEAAlMrh.jpg (341.7 KB)
341.7 KB JPG
>>108273578
SEX WITH OLD MEN