Thread #108287467
File: its ogre.png (68.4 KB)
68.4 KB PNG
Ubuntu said they will comply with califorinia's age verification law
335 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
This is not software fault nor the developer fault, people make this out to be the same thing like Discord.
They're just doing what the government wants for X country/state, you cannot avoid it if you want your software to continue living there.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108287467
If I was in their shoes, I would make a file is_verified at a known location like in /boot, so that they would officially comply with the law, but anyone could easily patch the ISO to avoid age verification.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
What fucking kids are installing Ubuntu on their machines??? They all get ChromeOS or at fucking best macOS (some schools have Macbooks for their students). Its usually the former though. Its not even about the kids anyway. I was really looking forward to computing but now it just seems like a locked down platform.
>>
File: DBus-Interface.png (73 KB)
73 KB PNG
This isn't so bad. It's like a mandatory parental control choice in the OS setup.
When you visit an 18+ website you have to click "Yes" to are you 18 or above.
This is pretty much the same thing, just automatically sending in a header or something that you're 18+. You're not sending them your driver's license or whatever with this like with Discord and Tinder.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108287592
For now all that is legally required is a local age selection slider. Literally you say you are eighteen and you can use your computer.
This is just the beginning though. Some day they will force you to go online and send your age to them. Then there will be actual ID verification
>>
>>108287699
How retarded and shortsighted are you that you dont think this is just the beginning before they slowly start to boil the frog and require more and more intrusive checks in the future.
Its so fucking obvious and you shouldn't tolerate this even a little bit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 02f.jpg (36.3 KB)
36.3 KB JPG
>>108288154
uhhh i need to generate hentai ma'am
>>
>>
File: haha.gif (421.6 KB)
421.6 KB GIF
"unconstitutional and unenforceable"
They'll find a way.
"people won't agree to this"
They will. They'll screech about it, until they realize screeching does nothing, and give up, and lick the boot.
"this is only an amerimutt problem"
It's coming to the EU.
"muh tor vpns"
They'll get banned.
Regardless, you American fuckers need to start shooting politicians ASAP. Send your Adam Lanzas to shoot at politicians instead of children.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
I went to look at linux mint forums regarding this issue and there is a thread about it. In it there is poster (Massimiliano) that I think is an AI bot and half the thead is his own posts, literal walls of text of AI garbage. Mint is pozzed, I looked at that thread and immediately ruled mint out. Surely there will be a distro that won't fall for this shit.
>>
File: 1767070013686309.png (194.5 KB)
194.5 KB PNG
Not my problem
>>
File: 2.jpg (302.7 KB)
302.7 KB JPG
>>108288526
archads... we won?
>>
>>108288262
We have reached a tipping point where all but the most innocuous of websites need to know the age – not the identity – of their users to remain compliant with a tsunami of new legislation, including:
Europe’s GDPR, Digital Services Act and Video Sharing Platform laws
Age Appropriate Design Codes in the UK, California and, coming soon, the EU
Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) in the USA
Australia and the UK’s Online Safety Acts
India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act
>>
>>108287699
>You're not sending them your driver's license or whatever
Yet, they are getting the framework in place to just slip it in another inch then another inch rinse and repeat until they are balls deep in your ass and your happy about it.
>>
File: debian.png (29.8 KB)
29.8 KB PNG
>>108288526
Why would you ever want to be downstream of that garbage fire. Better to be upstream.
>>
>>
>>108288604
>>108288642
i recognize that migrating to debian is kicking the can down the road but i support it
>>
>>
>>108288648
Not sure if you're following the debial-legal thread for this, but they're looking at either not doing it at all or just having it be a package the user can install or not. There's some idea on there that it might only really hold up to preinstalled OSes.
>>
>>
>>108288684
>just having it be a package the user can install or not.
That's how literally every other OS component works so it would be very strange if that weren't the case.
idk how else you could possibly do this.
>>
>>
>>108287699
>>108288138
>>108288185
>>108287854
Or, you know, this is just yet another pointless posturing move by the Cali gov (like the cancer warning stickers on everything) so they can get a pat on the back for being brave and progressive and it stops here because they know as soon as they push it into actual ID checking there will be major pushback. This is about as much as they can get away with before actual privacy invasion. Newsom isn't that retarded enough to think he can get away with that.
>>
>>
How are they going to enforce this for server variants? Especially the headless kind? They could ask for an age but it's retarded since every person who deploys a server is just going to mash the num pad and hit enter.
>>
>>
>>108288780
>Not mandatory though,
How the fuck are you supposed to have a mandatory component in what is essentially A TOOLKIT OF COMPONENTS FOR DEVELOPING AN OS YOURSELF?
Tell me please how the fuck that is supposed to work?
>>
>>
>>108288760
>going to mash the num pad and hit enter.
If I had to mash shit and hit enter during an ansible playbook we'd be switching distros faster than you could blink.
Well no it would be next planning cycle approximately three sprints after we dequeue the ticket because some junior can do it but that's pretty fast around here.
>>
>>
>>108288818
No clue, but, like I said, the only info I have for Ubuntu is the pic in OP.
I suppose if you wanted to you could patch the kernel to do some checks that would be time consuming and/or painful to circumvent without just swapping out your kernel.
I don't think you could stop people from simply installing from the server ISO and just installing a DE or compiling a kernel themselves, but the average user, who this is presumably targeting, won't do any of that.
>>
>>108288054
>you say you are eighteen and you can use your computer.
So kids aren't allowed to use a Linux desktop and play some SuperTuxKart?
They must use a phone with internet access and a camera and social media filled with pedophiles telling them to troon out?
>>
>>
>>108288628
Could it work in my benefit?
Could I fake my age and pretend to be 12 so they can't send me ads?
I'm not interested in social media and will never pay for porn so what's the downside of pretending to be underage on the modern internet?
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_2924.jpg (244.1 KB)
244.1 KB JPG
>>108287467
Leftie oriented OS listening to leftie oriented Government. Sad!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1745673156021477.jpg (71.5 KB)
71.5 KB JPG
>>108289067
>here, allow me to demonstrate my superiority by disapproving of your definitions
>>
>>
File: d98ad438ce4786ef2db87178ef89df5a.jpg (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB JPG
>>108288054
>integer field
>legally mandated to be a slider
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: boat realization.gif (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB GIF
>>108287699
>AgeVerification1
What, are they planning sequels?
>>
I mean, stuff like this is completely unenforceable with open source OSes
even if every mainstream distro bends the knee just switch to the fork someone will make that is exactly the same but with that shit removed
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: No.png (125.9 KB)
125.9 KB PNG
>>108288578
First thing I found on the subject:
https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=464956
>>
>>
>>
>>108289438
Apparently they’ve been planning it for a long time.
I now see where they were going with dbus and systemd.
I guess they feel now is the time to strike, that they’ve achieved “critical mass”, like invading lebanon. They’re going for it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
Easily circumvented, for any distro: just add it as an optional feature on OS install:
'Would you like to install AgeVerificationTools' coupled with a eula where it states that in some parts of the world this is required by law
Then just click NO
As an OS you've done your job: you've included Age verification tools. It's not your fault user clicks no
>>
File: 44fd9fc1-b70e-40fa-ada4-64499e40f739-3706750442.jpg (51.6 KB)
51.6 KB JPG
We have had digital ids for 20 years. In the near future you can't access the internet without plugging in the card. Truth is antithetical to the communist ideology which is why they want to stop the free flow of information.
>>
>>108287467
>Ubuntu said they will comply with califorinia's age verification law
Canonical are fucking retarded and don't understand the nature of the law. Per the nature of the law, anyone interacting with the system needs to age verify. Meaning everyone who ever interacts with the software means to age verify. Meaning anyone who does anything needs to age verify any time they land on a different system or transition between or within a network. The average person on the internet, per this law, needs to age verify 500+ times every 5 minutes.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108287699
it kind of relieves my stress when i think this way, which is a sure sign that it's wrong and i should keep being against this and keep letting it ruin my day
it's just another reminder that if i want to live in a way that respects my freedom i cant have all the latest toys and enjoy all the conveniences available. yeah i probably will be slinking down into a more obscure way of using my computer, again, as i kinda always have anyway. it makes me angry but giving in and trying to live how they want and use what they want would make me even angrier
>>
>>108289814
this is CAPITALISM you fucking retard.
The rich are writing these laws, microsoft is benefiting from this shit.
How are you such a mouthbreathing fat american piece of shit on the ground that you cannot ever recognize the problem. Everything is "the gommies", literaly CIA shitbrain, use that gun of yours for something good and shoot yourself.
>>
>>108287467
So, this is the culmination of decades of feminist fear-mongering and CSI-style special victims unit shows. You'll have no rights because somehow the children will be hurt, but also to hell with children since they'll be arrested too if they happen to input the wrong prompt to chatgpt. Meanwhile elites will continue to do whatever they please, literally.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: capcom.png (172.8 KB)
172.8 KB PNG
>>108290135
Let's compromise and say the current state is capitalist-communist.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1770800198742305.jpg (16.7 KB)
16.7 KB JPG
>>108287555
> Nooo don't be mad at us! it's not our fault we are just complying!
Why is everything so binary with people. You can be mad at the government AND the corporations that do their bidding.
>>
>>
File: Phone6.webm (600 KB)
600 KB WEBM
>>108289403
I'd prefer a wheel tho.
>>
>>108290273
100% all trans shootings are feds.
Trans community has more political radicals than most demographics out there. If they were going to kill people it would be CEOs and politicians. Every "trans shooting" has either been a detransed nazi or a fed plot.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108288185
They won't need to. Banning actively maintained operating systems from existing without age verification will be enough. Old systems will be grandfathered, but will naturally lose support and compatibility with modern standards over time. Sure, you'll be able to use an old Ubuntu desktop in 2036, but how much utility will it have? You'll have to do without a lot of stuff that people on current systems take for granted, and a lot of stuff that works now won't work anymore. This, combined with lack of availability will get most of the marketshare on to new verified operating systems.
That is of course not factoring in any small scale non-verified distros, which I'm almost certain will exist. I'm sure some schizo somewhere will maintain a non-age verified version of his favorite distro, and host it anonymously for people to use. And since the mainline distro maintainers are only doing this out of legal obligation, they'd only do the bare minimum, and wouldn't bother trying to hinder forks in any way.
>>
>>
>>
>>108290091
Its government in general. Any sufficiently large bureaucratic regime is going to become corrupt and do everything within its power to expand and enrich itself and its members, usually at the expense of its citizens. This is true of both communist and capitalist states.
>>
File: Phone4.webm (119 KB)
119 KB WEBM
>>108290428
based
>>
>>
>>108287592
>>108288054
this
none of the people whining about California's law have actually read it. It does not call for uploading IDs, face scans, or other shit. It operates on the honor system. It's a literal nothingburger. Unlike the doomers, I think having this law on the books will make worse laws harder to pass later, since they will have to prove the current law is ineffective first.
>>
File: 1713619585629731.jpg (39.1 KB)
39.1 KB JPG
>>108287467
Did the donators threaten the linux orgs to remove funding, or would they comply?
All they'd have to do is say in the license "This OS is not allowed to be used in California or other states that require age verification.", or something similar to completely absolve themselves.
Also, thousands of independent developers and especially outside the US and western countries are going to fork this shit, so how would they enforce this anyway?
They haven't even managed to get rid of foreign movie pirate websites after two decades.
>>
>>
>>108290874
>It does not call for uploading IDs, face scans, or other
Now. It doesn't for now.
>>108290929
This is mandatory for every OS.
>>
File: 1719347790656895.png (209 B)
209 B PNG
>>108287467
How would they even enforce this?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
I love watching the absolute self-destruction of linux faggots. Cuckolded little faggots, little pathetic slaves to the state. This is what you wanted. Fuck le eebil corporations, please please please give more power to the state. KEK now suffer, faggots.
>>
>>108287598
>Yeah, but the real shame is people will keep using it
If this is a problem then it'll already be forked. If people want it without, this is plausible.
>>108287608
>quired to use a digital ID certificate instead of merely asking your age (as a requirement)
It'd be *far* easier and less costly to just issue everyone with a passport, if this was the goal.
Device change. Frequently.
The digital pages on the passport can hold such things. The one solution would work equally well across the physical and digital spheres.
You wouldn't be allowing any opportunity for disparity, and certainly no opportunity to allow the self-administration.
>>
>>
>>108287643
It will be at least nationwide for the United States, if unofficially. And honestly - pretty likely to be worldwide.
Companies like Microsoft and Apple aren't going to maintain separate California Edition versions of their operating systems. And they're not going to add a prompt like "if you're a California resident tell us your age."
Instead they're going to say "well no states have laws saying we can't require our users age" - so they'll just collect it even in states where it's not necessary.
I think the way to really gunk this up is for states and nations to pass laws that contradict California law. That way companies can't just always require it.
Something like a privacy law stating you can't be forced to give any personal details in order to use the device. That you have to be able to create local accounts with no details, including age.
>>
>>
>>108292255
Maybe. I think you need some kind of Internet-connected computer to function but we still don't regulate Internet as a utility as we should. Try applying for a job without a computer, it's virtually impossible.
I'd just go more on a consumer protection angle. We should be able to go into a store, buy stuff, take it home, and use it however we see fit.
>>
>>
>>108287467
Yeah and? You're all making a big fuzz over this but this is a setting stored in the OS that applications can consult. That's it. There's nothing else to it. It's not intrusive at all. It's just to put responsibility into parents and companies because parents can't claim they forgot to put the age range and companies can't claim they didn't know the age range. It's also offline.
>>
>>108292297
"Hey website/app - this user is a kid!" seems like kind of a nightmare. They'll all 100 percent collect that data and sell it like that do all other data.
If a website needs to know if I'm 18 it can ask me.
If a website doesn't need to know, then there's no reason to pre-emptively tell it.
I see a future where this data is used for customized ads. If the kid flag is set you get ads about toys, if the adult flag is set you get ads about dick pills.
This is the state trying to pick up the slack because parents aren't parenting their own fucking kids. We've had options to restrict how kids can use devices for years. But because parents keep giving their kids completely unrestricted phones, the state is trying to parent the kids instead.
I don't want apps knowing anything they don't need to.
>>
>>108290949
Once you pass a law now it's harder to add to it. You will spend years and years proving it was ineffective. USA is in fact safe if this is the way they're moving forward. Much better than uploading photos or IDs and tackles the problem directly of age. You're putting responsibility on parents and companies without over engineering.
In EU however is where things are really fucked up because they want to force down our throats the digital wallet (even though it's optional) to prove your age. It's massively over engineering, a security nightmare, and they're trying to convince people that you're only giving the information you want to give.
Keep your California system. They're going to push age restriction regardless and this was the least intrusive idea so far and probably most effective if done right.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108287467
> give us your id to view porn sites
> give us your id to use social media
> give us your id to install apps
> give us your id to use a computer
> (we are here)
> give us your id to buy food
> give us your id or you're dead
>>
>>
>>108287467
Why are IT companies so cucked?
Why aren't they like banks or the chemical industry who more or less humiliate government inspectors whenever they show up complaining about XY not being adhered to (for years)?
>>
>>
>>108287643
Europe loves shit like this. Chat control will get through and Internet ID is becoming more popular too. This will be next on the list. Nobody will save them either because both the left and the right love it for different reasons.
>>
>>
>>
>>108292498
The jews are subject to the same principles.
You know how much more you pay for, say RTX 5090 in Israel compared to EU/NA?
It costs (if available at all) around 6000-8000 Eur there and the people have the same income as in germany.
The universe doesn't give a shit who are what you are.
>>
File: 1767708170208233.jpg (78.6 KB)
78.6 KB JPG
You can tell who the shills are in this thread by the way they point out Cali's law only requires a simple selection and that no where are they going to ask for IDs so stop worrying it's fine it's whatever.
>The slope isn't slippery stop worrying!
I hate you and I hate accelerate fags too. Always trying to keep people from taking action always trying to keep the frogs in the water as it heats up.
When everything comes tumbling down the same surveillance hell world apparatuses that track us also tracks you. You will be found and you will join your masters in the burn pit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
It'd be funny if both linux and windows to tell them to fuck off and put some clause that forbids them from using the OS because of their laws, then see them walking back because they'll have no OS to use otherwise. Won't happen, but it's an amusing thought regardless.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108292802
>Nothing to hide.
You are doing nothing wrong until they decide you are.
There are hundreds of thousands perhaps millions of laws on the books local, state, and federal. Many more added or changed all the time without your knowledge. Ever wonder why?
It's so they can fuck you over at any time they want.
The only thing that stops you from being labeled a criminal is if they're interested in doing so or not.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108292379
How about NO to either system?
The supposed problem doesn't exist. The only real problems are:
Data scrapers not knowing which posts are from fleshbags
Advertisers not knowing which clicks are from fleshbags
ADL not knowing who posted what
etc. these are the real issues and "age verification" is just the first step
>>
>>
>>
>>108287643
If I recall, Colorado is also implementing this and there some countries doing the same, aside from Europe. It's only a matter of before this becomes a defacto standard simply due to the number of countries requiring OS-level age verification eclipses countries that don't.
>>
>>
>>108293546
Here's an example actually: >>108286731
>>
File: at_last.jpg (52.8 KB)
52.8 KB JPG
>>108288155
free + dom
>>
>>108293477
While I totally agree with that, if they're going to push it hard, this is the best idea so far. It's the best workaround that solves the problem directly. Anything else like IDs, photos, etc. is easy to override with a VPN, over-engineered, and opens lots of security problems. This solution is secure by default because it's a setting stored in the OS. The problem is what apps do with that information and if they force you to tell.
>>
>>
>>108293885
They know every system will be bypassed before the system that requires a cert and will use that fact to push the cert. There are no easy technological solutions individuals can implement by themselves. The only way to fight this is to get organized and support political pressure groups like http://netchoice.org/
>>
>>108293071
That's not going to happen in Microsoft, Apple, or Google. They hate the EU, UK and AU ideas, but this one they like. In Linux you can do whatever the fuck you want and nobody can penalize you. However there's a very big catch, applications might expect you to have the age API. Say steam has it, now you're stuck.
>>
>>
>>108293901
It is yes
>>108293916
The goal of this law is not to be perfect. They know the majority will use it and that's what they want. You can lie or workaround the system, no problem.
The slippery slope of identifying you by certificate is real though, but not today.
>>
>>
>>
This is only being considered as a law because Microsoft wants to add it to their OS. Obviously ms needs to prevent Linux from being a viable alternative OS to theirs afterwards.
In a few years after all the normies are taking ID verification for granted, anyone trying to use a "hacked" is will seem like a total pedo.
You can argue all you want here, but you're defending an old system that doesn't make anyone any money. It was only a matter of time guys
>>
>>108293949
This. They know full well it's a bullshit requirement. This is a test to see how much pushback they get. Normalcattle probably aren't even aware of this law or they don't care as long as they can BBQ, watch Netflix and shop on Amazon.
They will come back and claim (within a year) and the current age verification process isn't working and that they will have to start requiring a face scan and uploaded ID or driver's license...
THAT is the goal.
>>
>>
>>
>>108293982
Fight what? All joking aside, the average person actually and literally is a fucking NPC who can barely operate their shitty iPhones. Do you really think the average person gives two fucks about a computer OS? Most them don't even have a PC in their house anymore.
You, me, and the others are a tiny monitory swimming in an ocean of literal NPCs. We have no power, no influence, and no army of lawyers to fight it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: nothingburger.png (48.2 KB)
48.2 KB PNG
stop falling for this doomer shit already.
>>
>>
>>
>>108287699
If it's so useless then why the fuck do it? Just have a normal admin account and allowlist sites you want your kid to be able to visit. You don't need age verification to disable dns or update the etc/hosts for a user. Or just do it on the router level ffs.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108294276
>Today: bro just type lick yes you are over 18 GGEZ
>Nothing to see here
>Two years later
>Bro since the button click verification didn't stop kids of lying we need your driver's license now
>GGEZ
You're a fucking idiot
>>
File: stop.png (61.3 KB)
61.3 KB PNG
>>108287467
Name & shame every distro that folds to this.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108292315
It's a setting that provides pii that any fucking app or website gets to read through a syscall. Tell me how this isn't a big fucking deal to anyone who cares about privacy?
Younger than 18. Use social media. Social media queries the syscall every time you use the service to pinpoint the day you turn 18.
Kill yourself
>>
>>
>>
>>108294311
It has nothing to do with kids, retards. It's just the excuse they use, because anyone who speaks out against it is "pro harming muh kids" - this works well with the normalcattle.
They don't give a rats ass about the kids. It's about power and control in a trojan horse.
>>
>>108288054
>Some day they will force you to go online and send your age to them.
This is retarded. I have to be 18 to enter a contract with an ISP.
My ISP knows my IP at all times.
The government can ask the ISP with a warrant for my identity.
Why bother with these laws?
Is everyone just retarded? Is that it?
>>
File: 1758274110436258.png (2.8 MB)
2.8 MB PNG
The OP is a Pinoy who spams Lunduke (Jew) shill posts because it thinks the Jew will help it get residency in America and Jews beg for money as they want gentiles to give them more than over 100 billion dollars every month.
Trannies love Jews, hence why none of these shill posts ever get deleted and why /pol/ was made.
https://archive.is/yWZdz
https://archive.is/VskAQ
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106886278/#106886278
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106894838/#106896329
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106895743/#106896002
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106895057/#106895909
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106895743/#106896165
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106895991/#106896050
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106893718/#106895855
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106896047/#106896089
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106895335/#106896013
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106886280/#106896356
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106894838/#106896329
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106890554/#106895985
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106895335/#106896013
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106895545/#106895937
>>
File: 1767155478720240.png (215.9 KB)
215.9 KB PNG
Reminder Lunduke is a Jewish Zio/Israhelli who:
- lives in America.
- wants you to think he likes free software.
- only attacks free software.
- calls you a child rapist and child murderer for believing the age of consent shouldn't be 25 or higher and for supporting free software (note Jewish Zios rape and kill non-submissive gentile children for sports).
- tried to ruin Stallman's life a decade before everyone else tried it because he couldn't counter anything Stallman said (note Lunduke claims to be a victim of cancel culture).
- wants gentiles banned off the internet for not identifying themselves with electronic identification.
- calls you a Nazi if you're secular (note Jews push secularism the most).
- gets easily irritated when you say Jews are Nazis (they are).
- denies Google/Microsoft are "big tech".
- denies getting paid by Google/Microsoft each time you click on his video/blog.
- accused a random chat room on Discord of being Arch's official chat room.
- wants every gentile banned on the internet unless they can be identified/doxxed (he even told 4cuck that it'll be a positive thing https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/108207225/#108209901).
>>
>>
>>
File: 1771184911098221.jpg (42 KB)
42 KB JPG
>>108292824
>>108292112
>>108290496
Lunduke is a Jew. Those bloodthirsty parasites don't need to buy ad slots on 4cuck as staff worships them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108294239
You are grossly overestimating how much most parents (people in general desu) understand tech. People are fucking idiots.
I'm of the opinion that if you're not willing to look into how to restrict your kid's devices then you shouldn't be giving your kids access to devices.
But I'm also of the onion that nobody reads anymore, everybody just clicks "yes/accept" to everything. We've all gotten pretty fucking stupid.
I'd be ok with a law saying when creating an account you have to present an age attestation option. But not actually require collecting it - allow users to say no.
Then the various app stores could choose to require it and I could just choose to not use those app stores.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108288054
It's very likely Microsoft, Apple and Google will respond to this law with an intrusive ID collection system, but Linux and other systems will be allowed for a time to get by with just a prompt asking how old you are when you setup a user or install (not sure how that's gonna work with minimal installs but we'll see)
Then we'll get the ID scan shit as a mandatory feature because Big Tech and Mass Media will stir up a fuss going "look at these degenerate hackers using Linux and BSD which can bypass the spirit of the law because a child can just lie and say he's over 18!"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108287467
If I get rugpulled on using this distro, I will actually be so pissed. I can't be bothered switching. Why did I pick this shit distro? Is it just going to be put into every version? Am I getting regulated by california even though I live in germany? This place is bad enough, don't make it worse.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108290917
>All they'd have to do is say in the license "This OS is not allowed to be used in California or other states that require age verification.", or something similar to completely absolve themselves.
Is this compatible with the GPL?
If yes, I see no reason why any project shouldn't do that
>>
>>
>>108295458
Doubtful. The GPL doesn't allow placing restrictions on use, I think stating that users of a certain area aren't allowed to use it would violate that.
If I produce gpl software - even a restriction like "you can't use this to break the law" is ultimately a restriction. I should allow people to do illegal shit if that's what they want to do.
>>
>>108295458
I don't know, but I doubt they are even slightly thinking about source code, and that's all the GPL covers. The GPL doesn't even slightly restrict what you can do with binaries. If you wanted to only distribute binaries to your cousin João for 100€ a month and nobody else, that's no problem with the GPL.
>>
>>
File: 1769820249284325.png (2.4 MB)
2.4 MB PNG
Source? The last time I checked they wanted to wait for the final law before doing anything. Also why this specimen isn't in the gas chamber?
>>
>>108295525
Forgot to add, but the GPL, if I remember correctly, only requires that you distribute source code to the users of your software. Those users must then be free to distribute the source code as they wish.
>>
>>
>>108287467
we used to have family computers and some families still do. What do they mean by the age of the user? As if only the one person uses the computer. Do they expect age per user account? Because, one person using the computer is not always the case. And I will just say that I've never seen people using multiple account even on windows. We tried it early, it's stupid. Even using non-administrator a account on windows is annoying. Having multiple ones is even worse. If user accounts were good that would be the way to approach it, but people won't for that to comply. The wife or a kid will just use the same account as the dad. That was the case for majority. The law is just plainly retarded. Whenever you sit at other computer when you visit your parents or whatever makes breaks that brittle stupid law. It's impossible to implement in any sensible manner. People don't like inconvenience and user have nothing in it for creating separate accounts.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108296254
>If a red state passed this law they'd give everything they had to defying it. But since it's a blue state they're bending right over.
they already did it to porn sites. I guarantee this isnt off the board
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108290874
It will be trivial to prove this useless law is ineffective. It will have the opposite effect of what you claim. It sets the precedent that it is useful and necessary to determine the age of the user. That part of the debate can basically be bypassed from now on, now the debate becomes about how to fix this completely ineffective system because people can easily lie to bypass it. Never mentioning the fact that it shouldn't be in place at all.
It's a literal psyop. We don't have a problem, so we fail to solve the non problem with a stupid law that doesn't work. Then they go back to it at a later date, suddenly we DO have a problem - we have this law, but it doesn't work! People can easily bypass it! Better fix that...
The debate never comes back to whether or not the law was necessary in the first place because of the implication that that has already been established by making the initial law.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108294311
>What stops a kid from using their parents passport to get around this?
It has a PIN.
>What stops me from using mine to set the age and then sell that on German craigslist?
It's a crime. The passport also has pseudonymous ID function. It creates a unique ID that can't be traced to you and is unique to the requesting service. So 2 services can't even compare if the same user registered to them.
>>
>>
File: sucks 2 be Californian.png (157.3 KB)
157.3 KB PNG
>>108287467
California residents not authorized to use Midnight BSD after January 1, 2027
>You may download MidnightBSD below. If possible, use the UK or https://allbsd.org mirror.
>Most users want the amd64 (x86_64) version. It's for any x86_64 compatible CPU from AMD, Intel, or Hygon.
>California residents are not authorized to use MidnightBSD for desktop use in the state of California effective January 1, 2027. California law CA AB1043 requires a complex age verification system implemented for operating systems with no exceptions for small open source projects. At this time, we don't have development time or a plan in place for this.
https://www.midnightbsd.org/download/
Can someone like sue the Ubuntu maintainers into doing something similar? Maybe a class action lawsuit type thing?
>>
Age verification is only a problem if it's required to login to the actual os. Otherwise it's only a problem for people with bad intentions or the underaged, who shouldn't be allowed online anyways, since they are annoying and lame.
>>
>>
File: guard looks at you 2.gif (88.6 KB)
88.6 KB GIF
>>108290874
>it doesnt call fo it
Retard. Once they have any information on you they can extract it.
>it's only a VOLUNTARY measure
>it's only a TEMPORARY tax
>nobody is FORCING you
Same logic
>>
>>
Bernstein v. United States determined that writing code is a form of expression protected by the first amendment.
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette and Wooley v. Maynard affirm that the government cannot force you to express something you disagree with.
California's AB1043, Colorado's Senate Bill SB26-051, and New York's S8102A all compel operating system developers to write code they may not want to write.
This violates the first amendment and should be struck down.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1769332725857770.jpg (53.3 KB)
53.3 KB JPG
>>108287467
I use Linux Mint ;)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108287592
This is onboarding. After they have the structure, then they begin integrating various mechanisms.
The purpose is to have Mossad control over every pc. That doesn't just mean "I can turn your computer off" or "I can block your internet" - they want to look through files, and display threatening messages.
An example of what Mossad did this year was they took over a prayer time app and spammed the notifications of people in Iran with taunts.
Mossad wants total world control, and there's no reason to think that any of the pro-homosexuals of tech are manly enough to say no.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>108303227
>Oh, the law exists.
false.
law does not exist.
If fact, you can't write a law.
I can demonstrate this to you. The first laws of the nation were the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. One is the First Amendment. And, you think there is a right to protest in it - it's not there. This is the meaning of "laws don't exist" and "you can't write a law".
>>
>>
>>
>>108303287
>>108303397
(You're thinking of the Declaration of Independence)
>>
>>
>>
File: 1772738000955.jpg (23.6 KB)
23.6 KB JPG
>>108303397
If you want a quick history of the law
>>
>>
File: 1771525954682658.jpg (8.4 KB)
8.4 KB JPG
>>108288617
always
>>
>>108303410
wikipedia
>17th-century English philosopher John Locke discussed natural rights in his work, identifying them as being "life, liberty, and estate (property)", and argued that such fundamental rights could not be surrendered in the social contract. Preservation of the natural rights to life, liberty, and property was claimed as justification for the rebellion of the American colonies. As George Mason stated in his draft for the Virginia Declaration of Rights, "all men are born equally free", and hold "certain inherent natural rights, of which they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity."
I can go on, in this area.
>>
>>
>Sen. Sasse: (02:31:58) What role does the Declaration of Independence play in interpreting the Constitution or what's the relationship between the two documents?
>Amy Coney Barrett: (02:32:06) Well, the Declaration of Independence is an expression of our ideals, expression of our desire to be free of England. It's not law, however. The Constitution is law. So the Constitution is our foundational law and governing document. And, while the Declaration of Independence tells us a lot about history and about the roots of our Republic, it isn't binding law.
>Sen. Sasse: (02:32:37) What are the five freedoms of the First Amendment?
>Amy Coney Barrett: (02:32:41) Speech, religion, press, assembly... Speech, press, religion, assembly. I don't know, what am I missing?
>Sen. Sasse: (02:32:53) Redress or protest.
>Amy Coney Barrett: (02:32:54) Okay.
>>
>>108303597
https://www.rev.com/transcript-editor/shared/nAFv3oPiIvetG5LPnk-LR6ypU 9UQ8KYEHv00VWkpIXXma0A82YELGwlz9OuN UARorgU5r2qoPvQB-OTBNz9jAds22Lc?loa dFrom=PastedDeeplink&ts=9118.52
>>
>>
>>108303796
Eh, Linux will be fine, even if all the big distros implement, which seems unlikely. People will just fork it and use the unfucked version.
It's the windows and mac users who will be stuck giving DNA samples just to log in, if they don't switch.
Reading this legislation it also looks like they'll be required to analyze what you do to see if the age is a lie. Gotta use those NPUs they shove in modern processors somehow.
>>
>>
File: stupidity.png (21.3 KB)
21.3 KB PNG
>>108303986
Yes.
>>
>>108304013
>>108303986
Highly relevant ai slop:
The J7 Task Force (Large Communities’ Task Force Against Antisemitism) is a coalition of major Jewish organizations from seven countries, formed by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in 2023 to combat rising global antisemitism. It includes the largest Jewish diaspora communities in liberal democracies.
Countries Represented and Their Member Organizations:
Argentina: Delegación de Asociaciones Israelitas Argentinas (DAIA)
Australia: Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ)
Canada: Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA)
France: Conseil Représentatif des Institutions Juives de France (CRIF)
Germany: Central Council of Jews in Germany
United Kingdom: Board of Deputies of British Jews
United States: Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations
The J7 coordinates on policy, security, tech, education, and advocacy, and has issued joint statements on global issues like antisemitism at the UN and post-October 7 hate surges.
>>