Thread #18368513
File: B2B09D5403C2FFBDC6A750BB5411E0C3.jpg (100.8 KB)
100.8 KB JPG
How come america got richer the more standards it dropped for money?
First it dropped the silver standard to go pure gold in 1873 and this allowed it to equal europe in wealth, then it created the federal Reserve in 1913 which allowed it to surpass europe in wealth. After that it ended the gold standard in 1933 for the public which made it a superpower.
Then in 1971 it ended the gold standard for governments and that cemented it's power as the richest country.
Every time it messed with it's currency, it got richer.
Does it mean the more you mess with your currency the better it gets?
34 RepliesView Thread
>>
Youre retarded so allow me to simply it for you. My credentials are that im Hokkien, the Jews of East Asia.
Basically, the world trades in USD, the reserve. USD is backed by global trade and global debt. Everyone owes each other in USD, driving up demand for USD and giving it value. This allows the US to export inflation to every other country on this earth by printing vast sums to enrich themselves enjoy deficit spending so long as everyone continues to buy dollars with their own currencies or with goods and services.
If the music should stop, as in, no one buys USD with other currencies or goods or services, it all comes crashing down for America due to its massive federal debt.
Basically, US is rich because everyone uses USD.
>>
>>
>>18368523
>Shouldn't america have gotten poorer because they ended silver, then created a fed, then ended gold?
Did you read my post? The world trades in USD, giving USD immense value. Would you rather a gold based currency backed by speculation on the worth of shiny rocks or a fiat currency backed by global debt?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>18368513
It was a bait and switch. First US dollar was backed by real gold, and US said to the world you don't need gold just use USD, it is as good as gold and you can redeem USD for gold at any time. Now USD became the reserve currency. Then US government rugged everyone by closing the gold window.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>18368523
The person you responded to is retarded.
But you know whats even more retarded pinning your currency to something worthless in a practical sense like gold.
You realize that gold itself was fiat currency its only value was in the fact people believed it had value.
Modern currency are backed by the output of the country as a whole and the stability of the system. Instead of a random rock.
>>
>>
>>
>OP learns about financialization
Good on you. Keep digging. Currency debasement is integral to a system based on debt. When everyone needs that currency, it's more important than having it backed by some randomly chosen "scarce" resource. When your money is completely fake, it's easier to just use epic math formulas to make it grow exponentially without any physical limitations of "real" materials or labor.
>>
>>18368513
If you tell people your money is the debt you collect, you can get people to move without paying them at all while being highly motivated, maybe this gives the upper hand in relative scale so you literally work harder than other nations, but in the end, everyone will want to get paid at the same time and that's when things fall apart.
Maybe the key is convincing people to work for you, then killing them when they don't work anymore or want to be paid. As long as you sustain this cycle you will achieve peak efficiency.
>>
>>
>>
>>18368519
>If the music should stop, as in, no one buys USD with other currencies or goods or services, it all comes crashing down for America due to its massive federal debt.
It's the opposite though, that would make it much easier to pay the debt.
>>
>>18368773
Except it's not "some random rock"
The reason gold is valued as money is because its chemical properties (doesnt corrode) and limited supply gives it characteristics well suited to function as money. The only reason silver was used alongside gold is that its easier to divide. If you used copper or some other random rock, demand would go up and increased mining/refining would dilute the existing supply. Doesnt happen with gold.
The belief you do need is that asteroid mining or some alchemy discovery to synthesize gold doesnt happen. "Belief that it had value" makes it sound faith based, which it isnt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>18369006
O no you are retarded.
Nobody assinged a benjamin to Tracys day of labour at the BBQ joint.
Its belief. Yes overprinting currency weakens it. But only if belief weakens. There is no direct monetary connection. Only the one we make in our minds, If people actually understand how currency works we would print trillion dollar notes tomorrow and pay off the national debt.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>18370857
I mean I'm not advocating for impoverishing most all but a few nations that can meaningfully assert themselves, I'm not sure it is a winning or necessary strategy. I just think it might be kind of stupid to sustain unsustainable growth with imaginary value ad infinitum. Maybe ending the speculation would solve all the problems with fiat currency, maybe, I doubt it, but whose to say you can't have your cake and eat it too? I don't think anyone will try and restore a degree of responsibility though, which means that eventually the scheme collapses under its own weight and the more forceful correction comes.