Thread #18371138
File: d6b3463ff3394ceff254ffe0ed10f1dd.jpg (46.5 KB)
46.5 KB JPG
Why are farmer-tropical races smaller than boreal races
The most obvious case study is the Americas, with central Americans being midgets and those living in the southern edge and the plains being known as tall
In china too this pattern holds, northern Chinese are known to be taller than southern chinese
31 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
File: 44b83804bca95889db63bc91f460a408.jpg (78.7 KB)
78.7 KB JPG
>>18371147
Megafauna, especially large mammals, appeared to thrive in colder eras.
Mammals seem to become smaller in warm periods
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 32b0657c73ea56851f27d0de3a1b2934.jpg (77.1 KB)
77.1 KB JPG
>>18371138
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>18371261
The small tribes of micronesia likely experience gigantism as result of isolation
If you look at tropical groups in general in more limited spaces (andamanese, mbuti, central American amerindians, southeast asians, indians, abos.
They tend to be all small peoples.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Screenshot_20260302-103535-display-0.png.png (349.3 KB)
349.3 KB PNG
>>18371291
Nta but...
The natives of new Zealand are BWC rapebabies
>>
File: Screenshot_20260302-104756~2.png (359.8 KB)
359.8 KB PNG
>>18371299
The same is true for American, Canadian and even Australian natives
People underestimate how much the anglos raped the indigenous people of the areas they settled
They are all mostly mestizos.
>>
>>18371138
Farming has been a lot easier to do in warm climates and has been more widespread there for a far longer time period. Historically, farming has typically given people far less nutritious and varied food compared to hunter-gatherers.
There are also a usually an evolutionary advantage to being bigger for a hunter-gatherer, such as running faster and throwing projectiles further and also being stronger in general. For a farmer, there's nothing pushing the gene pool in such a direction, and in case of famines and the like, being smaller is actually advantageous.
The only cases where hunter-gatherers have ended up smaller are special cases where being small has been better, such as hiding for rainforest pygmies, or being big has been worse, such as any case of island dwarfism and living in very harsh climates.
>>
File: 08ba3e87a7a99d915c4d62f2c7de1bb8 (1).jpg (116.7 KB)
116.7 KB JPG
Steep DNA
>>
>>
>>18371138
>>18371171
Short ≠ Big ≠ Tall
Being Big is more than height
There is frame, thickness, muscle mass etc...
>>
File: Glyptodon_old_drawing.jpg (56.6 KB)
56.6 KB JPG
>>18371158
This post makes no sense, Megafauna were literally exterminated by manlet humans.
>>
File: IMG_20240910_021927_470.jpg (155.7 KB)
155.7 KB JPG
Is this another "nerdy /pol/ack lives out his power fantasies by looking and drooling at muscular men which he'll never resemble" thread? I've noticed this happens a lot on this website
>>
File: dinka-tribe-tallest-africa-11.jpg (283.6 KB)
283.6 KB JPG
Sudan niggers are tall
>>
File: anepheno.jpg (213.3 KB)
213.3 KB JPG
>>18371926
Yet they're framlets
mogged by ANE NWE ANGLO NORDIC BVLLS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>