Thread #219655144
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
only aryan people from pic related can post ITT
+Showing all 27 replies.
>>
>>219655144
Hello my Aryan brothers. Germano-Celt here.
>>
What if I’m American
>>
>>219655144
Am I an ayran?
>>
>>219655279
No
>>
>>219655144
VGH
FROM IRELAND TO THE BENGAL
>>
BBC
>>
>>219655144
Been posting about this recently
>Āryan derives from Sanskrit Ārya which is a vṛddhi of Arya and is valid only for Indian Hindus, Iranic speakers used "Ariya" or "Airiia." Aryan is certainly not a valid name for any Europeans as you seem to imply (since copulating with dogs is associated with European women, and European Nazis stole that old Indian endonym).
(For context it was under a post about Persian miniature painting of a woman copulating with a dog, which a Mexican and Lithuanian referred to as Aryan)
>The term Iranian or "Irani" or "Er" in middle Persian already descends from Avestan "Airiia" or Old Persian "Ariya", the English "Aryan" with the long initial vowel is from the attested Sanskrit term "Ārya." Iranians used the other (cognate) terms, not Ārya, and they were not referred to as such in Sanskrit.
>>
>>219655144
Total Aryan Death
>>
I denounce *Dyēws
>>
Sir morning good
>>
I am Brahmin
>>
>>219655144
I'm black nigga
>>
>>219655144
Your 19th century map is pseudoscientific, back then it was believed that Aryan = Indo-European, but in fact Aryan means Indo-Iranian from the Sintashta culture.
If you do not have the asian branch of haplogroup R1a-Z93, then you are in no way related to the Aryans.
>>
>>219655873
>
>>
>>219655144
what's up my niggas
>>
>>219655714
Preach it brother
>>
>>219655580
Aryan doesn't mean Indo-Iranian from the Sintashta culture >>219655954, and the steppe ancestors of modern Indians were from unknown Fatyanovo derived group not the Sintashta (which is why even Srubnaya models as a better source of steppe ancestry in Indians than Sintashta, though neither were ultimately ancestral to Indians).
>If you do not have the asian branch of haplogroup R1a-Z93
This is actually not a bad metric as far as grafting archaeogenetics onto discussions about identity goes, considering how important patrilineage was historically. There are still issues here, Netanyahu carries the Indo-Iranian R1a haplogroup for instance.
Ultimately Arya was used as an endonym all over India, from the far North to deep inside Tamil lands, continuously for 4000 years and nowhere else.
>>
>>219655580
>>219656096
fellow hinduaryan saaaar to put it kindly - nobody gives a shit
>>
>>219655144
I'm Aryan too
>>
kilniųjų-arijų tema \o/
kažkaip daugoka lietuvių, kiek čia mūsų? Bent trys tai tikrai.
>>
>>219655144
Thats a whatifalthist map isn't it
>>
>>219656096
>unknown Fatyanovo derived group not the Sintashta
Saar but fatyanovo is the predecessor of sintashta and is essentially a proto-saar-iranian.
>from the far North to deep inside Tamil lands
Saar we aint dalits
>>
>>219656599
blet, tikrai...
https://youtu.be/BaAqD5kOEBQ?si=1FSbBvYkh-RIxlXa&t=835
>>
>>219655714
Turks were the only ones who successfully copied the Aryan strategy. Mongols failed to impose their language and culture.
We still win in the long run though.
>>
>>219655279
yes
>>219656042
wassup nigga
>>
Hello my fellow Aryans
>>
I’m absolutely Aryan

Reply to Thread #219655144


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)