>>64919417
It's funny how literally everyone is cloning an old German design.

>phased array antenna
AKA Starlink. High bandwidth low latency video feed enables accurate manual targeting anywhere on the globe. Highly resistant to jamming.

>>64920018
>Highly resistant to jamming
Lol no, it relies on clock synchronization the same as GPS, if you can jam GPS you can jam starlink.
They have proven extremely useful in Ukraine because all the jamming in on the front so if you revert to autopilot to get past the front there is no jamming in the rear.

>>64920036
>if you can jam GPS you can jam starlink
GPS signal is way weaker and easier to jam. GPS satellites are much further away and they have no targeted beamforming. Not comparable at all.

>>64920136
>GPS signal is way weaker and easier to jam
Yes, starlink is higher power so requires more power to jam, that isn't "Highly resistant to jamming" it just means jammers effective range is reduced.

>>64920036
civilian starlink rely on regular civilian gnss because for 99% of people its available and reliable and allows faster connections. and even those can still work under gnss jamming if you fiddle with the settings/firmware a bit.

for military starlink they have military positioning systems which ignore gnss jamming (using gyroscopes,SLAM from the outside cameras...) and will reliably connect to satellites despite any gnss jamming problems not to mention they can work without any positioning data by just sweeping the sky until they hit a satellite and do so automatically same as any millitary satcom system like ones from 30 years ago.

if every gnss satellite were to disappear tommorow LUCAS would still function mostly fine. this isnt the 90s GNSS isnt the bleeding edge of millitary tech

>>64920002
You know the Germans make good stuff.