Thread #25110534
File: 34t5t35.jpg (54.3 KB)
54.3 KB JPG
Teach me some morals...
Thank you..
58 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
File: 31805.png (407.4 KB)
407.4 KB PNG
>>25110534
Don't do to others what you would not like being done to you. This includes animals.
>>
>>25110622
that's wrong because, we may not have the same preferences :)
(“Le chrétien dit : « Faites à autrui ce que vous voudriez qu’il vous fît. » A quoi un dramaturge moraliste, B. Shaw, réplique avec esprit : « Ne faites pas à autrui ce que vous voudriez qu’il vous fît : vous n’avez peut-être pas les mêmes goûts. »” -- Georges Palante, Sensibilité Individualiste)
>>25110534
seek happiness; and don't think happiness is pleasure or lack of suffering
be good to you, don't be bad to you
>>
File: stirner.jpg (138.2 KB)
138.2 KB JPG
>>25110534
>morals
spooked
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1772137027187.jpg (411.2 KB)
411.2 KB JPG
>>25110622
That was a long time ago. I'm a completely different person now.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>25110622
Kant was a retard. Categorical imperative is neither an accurate description of how people behave nor good advice for how to behave
>>25110534
Ask yourself what you really, truly want, then decide to try to make it happen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: wheelchair confederates.jpg (38.9 KB)
38.9 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: czytelnik wstępny_niesławny.png (5.5 KB)
5.5 KB PNG
>>25110716
>TND good TNL bad
>>
>>
>>
File: 20260228_221714.jpg (349.2 KB)
349.2 KB JPG
>>25110534
Can't remember if I highlighted this or it was the previous owner
Either way, it's a good one
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>25114277
If I kill you because someone else wants you dead that's still immoral. Subjective wants have nothing to do with it. Having a child is moral, killing a child or preventing a birth is immoral because morality serves Creation. Any attempt to subvert this basic truth is evil.
>>
>>25114295
>If I kill you because someone else wants you dead that's still immoral.
it would be immoral if i didn't want you to kill me
> Having a child is moral, killing a child or preventing a birth is immoral because morality serves Creation. Any attempt to subvert this basic truth is evil.
christcuck nonsense
>>
>>
>>25114301
>it would be immoral if i didn't want you to kill me
Braindead. In the example everyone else in the world wants you dead so I selflessly sacrifice my own wants to kill you.
>christcuck nonsense
It's pre-Christian, the only form of coherent morality ever presented as a philosophy and the basis for how moral intuition evolved in you, monkeys and even far simpler creatures.
>>
>>25114363
>Braindead. In the example everyone else in the world wants you dead so I selflessly sacrifice my own wants to kill you.
i find it implausible that everyone in the world except me and you wants me dead
>It's pre-Christian, the only form of coherent morality ever presented as a philosophy and the basis for how moral intuition evolved in you
it's crackhead epicurean nonsense you mean
>>
Procreating is bad because being a human body is bad. Don't reproduce. And really consider the suffering and toil it takes just to maintain the functions of your body. The food the toil the work. Not just by you but all thr others that must be farmed and due and the labour it takes to get to you. Your loving state depends upon the suffering of others. I think to be moral is to either die by suicide violently as a rejection of the conditions of human existence, or starve to death as a purifying of a body who built itself up and sustained it itself on the suffering of others.
>>
File: Pāli Suttas.png (268.5 KB)
268.5 KB PNG
>>25110534
>>
>>
>>25110690
Spook is a self-devouring concept if you deny reality, and this includes morality.
Not social cues and games- those typically oppose morality, mistaking any moral being to be a hostile player, vying for power.
>>
>>
>>25111090
That's quitter talk. You're not even planning to win, nor to write anything but demoralizing jargon.
How many times has there been a glimpse of genius, of a greater Universe, stamped out misunderstood by his or her time - only to be revealed to be common sense centuries later?
No, even if you "lose" the monkey games, you can absolutely be correct.
>>
>>
>>
>>25115180
>i find it implausible
You will never understand how much I and every thinking person in the world despises you.
You're yapping about morality but what you actually mean by it is an appeal to majority mob rule. That's pure, malicious, destructive evil and you're too braindead to even explore your own supposed fucking position.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>25115450
You are mistaking earthly success in your life with winning
One who lives on as an egregore after death has won the fundamental human quest for meaning beyond themselves even if they die poor and unknown.