My buddy had a theory: he said male sexuality is like two-dimensional plane. You "start" at -X for masculinity and as you gain X, your Y increases and you become more "straight." If you gain too much X it reaches 0. You're as straight as a man can be. But if you go beyond, to a positive X, your Y goes down. You end up gay.

>>25114437
Repulsive stemtard can’t articulate himself

>>25114428
HOLY SHIT LITERALLY ME
Seriously tho, I relate to that feeling so much, bros. Is there something wrong with me? And what is wrong with me?

File: 1747106606147147.jpg (144.4 KB)

144.4 KB JPG

>>25114442
For those who cannot visualize mathematical concepts in their head

>>25114453
According to this theory a tranny is the straightest

File: 7021871.png (51.8 KB)

51.8 KB PNG

>>25114428

>>25114428
LITERALLY fake and gay, I hate this world so much. The collapse of Modernity can't come fast enough.

Literally me when I played water polo.

>>25114461
superbased

File: rats.jpg (26.3 KB)

26.3 KB JPG

>>25114437
Close. Sexuality is regulated by natal hormone exposure. One way to measure natal hormone exposure at a particular time in development is the ratio betwen your index and ring finger (2d:4d ratio).

Gay tops have the highest 2d:4d ratio, corresponding to the most testosterone in the womb. Straight men fall under them. Versatile gay men fall under straight men. And, at the lowest level of testosterone are gay bottoms.
Lesbians also rank as you would expect.

Basically the Romans were right all along and topping is straight

>>25114428
Nope. I refuse.

>>25114510
ive been to Rome and now that im back it means i am im the condition of having come from Rome which means i am Roman which by your logic means you must trust to me when i tell you that, upon the basis of information theory, you are gay until you try something gay and decide its not for you. otherwise you are just scared of determining if you are gay (which is man’s default condition at birth)

>mindless automatons want recognition and clout, not joy or real convictions
uhhh what retard didn't already know this. he's just a male instagram attention-whore, and the internet has been making fun of them for over a decade

>>25114488
Hold your breath.

>>25114442
*Yet another repulsive stemtard

>>25114428
>legacy outlets lavishing attention on this boring retard when eggman was 100x more interesting and ahead of him by years

>>25114437
>>25114453
>this confuses the litfag

>>25114545
The parabola?

>>25114428
Who? "Clavicular" sounds like a body part the penis is not supposed to go but might find itself encroaching upon anyway

>>25114428
lmao

>>25114428
Zizack should be nailed to a chair and forced to view evidence about how every single thing he believes is wrong and parasitic and how he is nothing but a parasite that has had a net negative impact on reality until he kills himself

>>25115660
Oh great one, mighty Zizek with the eye of heaven blessed to see the future, forgive this anon in his hubris to utter a word against your prophecies, we have kicked and hit him like a dog, but he still barks, provides no claim for his evidence against you.

>>25114428
How is this not the Allegory of the Cave? the Shadows on the cave wall, (fantasies of sex) are just as real, and therefor equal to, or better than the actual thing itself (physically having sex) The simulacra is undefeated.

>>25114428
It's true. The build-up and the courtship before sex are way more of a turn-on. Actual sex can't compare to the potential of it.

>>25115784
Clearly a virgin or only ever plapjacked. There is no way you fucked the tight puss raw, and saw the light of creation then to turn around and say this.

>>25115788
I've put my raw dangling cockadoodledoo into tight unbroken hymen vaginal openings 6 or 7 times.

>>25115788
Never used a condom with my ex. It was okay. Only virgins obsess over sex.

>>25114428
Zizek is just a decent Hegel populariser, which to be fair is already good enough because Hegel is the goat. Your loss dismissing him for being oh so obscure or muh seven planets (fake and gay slander btw)

>>25114510
Source?

>>25114428
Garbage.

>>25114570
Kek

>>25114428
i agree with that in non-love sense, if you are just talking about pulling girls and casual sex. winning is knowing you have won the game and she is down for it. many times i have looked at women poorly for having sex with me, like "is that all it took?". i put this down to the Madonna/Whore Complex thing.

>>25115773
leftists will grift on ancient theory and pass it off as something new. they just can't help it. society of the spectacle is also the allegory of the cave.

>>25117818
reflect on this:
>fool me once, shame on you;
>fool me twice, shame on me.

>>25114437
>>25114453
He could just have said that masculinity is a bell curve..

>>25118273
Anon described a parabola