Thread #129561581
File: drag innit.png (2.1 MB)
2.1 MB PNG
>It was a shock when John died, but I wasn't too bummed about it. He was just such a cunt you know? To be honest I was pretty relieved, glad even. I sometimes wish I was there when he got shot so I could laugh in his face as he bled out on the pavement.
Damn, Paul. Pretty harsh. Was he justified in saying this?
21 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
Paul and all the other Beatles were jew goblins who hated one another because they all schemed and cheated one another on rights deals as the band was breaking up. Seems like it took him a while to realize he could use John's death for mythmaking and self-aggrandizement by pretending like they were still old pals and called each other every night to say "I love you" right up until the end. Definitely helped push some Beatles reissues
>>
File: job.png (252.4 KB)
252.4 KB PNG
>>129561581
>>129561874
>knowing this much about 60s one direction
either autistic or unemployed. or both.
>>
>>
>>
File: ewmki4rcnbmg1[1].jpg (80.8 KB)
80.8 KB JPG
Paul in his new Vanity fair interview
>>
>>129564419
>steamy new boyband lore
it's really sad you have this saved on your PC. have you told /wpop/ about this yet? >>129562096
>>
>>
>>
File: 1752181628168164.jpg (8.6 KB)
8.6 KB JPG
>>129561581
>okay cheers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>129564801
Watched it at the weekend. Pretty good but could have had more detail.
>>129568588
t. Boybandfag samefagging
>>
>>
Magnus Olympus
The saddest clowns in the world:
"The seething din of millennials faded into the warming night, their cries of "the Beatles fucking suck" and "Boomers are to blame for all my failings" were dampened to silence by the mist, and drown by the morning dew.
But they'd be awake by early afternoon, only to start the plaintive ritual again; the melancholy wailing bouncing off the backlit screens and cereal boxes surrounding them, while members of other generations, working, raising families, contributors all, heard nothing of it. The local flora turned as deaf an ear as the fauna, and the cloudless sky, too; and so continued the spiteful blameful opera voiced by the directionless adherents of America's voluntary class of malding malaisial millennials."
>>
>>129564516
The Beatles are often considered the "original" or "prototype" boy band due to their massive, screaming teenage girl fan base, matching suits, and early pop hits, especially during the height of Beatlemania. However, they differ fundamentally from traditional boy bands because they were an organic group, wrote their own music, played their own instruments, and matured into artists, rather than being a manufactured product.
Key Arguments for and Against:
Arguments for "Boy Band":
Beatlemania: Their early 1960s image featured intense, frenzied reactions from young female fans.
Marketing: They had matching haircuts and mop-top suits.
Arguments Against "Boy Band":
Creative Control: They wrote their own material, unlike typical manufactured boy bands.
Instrumentation: They played their own instruments and were a functioning band for years before fame.
Evolution: They quickly evolved beyond simple love songs into complex, artistic music (e.g.Rubber Soul**Revolver).
Conclusion: The Beatles were a pop-rock band that, for a brief periodfunctioned as a boy band in terms of marketing and audience reaction, but they were not manufactured as one. They are often described as the template for later, more manufactured groups.
Boybandfag BTFO as usual. KWAB