>>129564015
60s Zayn and 60s Louis Tomlinson about to ascend the Starry Ladders up in this bitch!

>>129564015
they are so heckin wholesome and wacky! love these guys!

>>129564104
Kill yourself

>>129564015
Whom was the better drummer?

>>129566200
that's Paul and John
(both of whom were better than Ringo at drumming)

>>129564015
Just lads being lads

>>129568250
Look again (perhaps with your spectacles on). Also, citation needed on John's drumming.

>>129564104
The Beatles are often considered the "original" or "prototype" boy band due to their massive, screaming teenage girl fan base, matching suits, and early pop hits, especially during the height of Beatlemania. However, they differ fundamentally from traditional boy bands because they were an organic group, wrote their own music, played their own instruments, and matured into artists, rather than being a manufactured product.

Key Arguments for and Against:
Arguments for "Boy Band":
Beatlemania: Their early 1960s image featured intense, frenzied reactions from young female fans.
Marketing: They had matching haircuts and mop-top suits.

Arguments Against "Boy Band":
Creative Control: They wrote their own material, unlike typical manufactured boy bands.
Instrumentation: They played their own instruments and were a functioning band for years before fame.
Evolution: They quickly evolved beyond simple love songs into complex, artistic music (e.g.Rubber Soul**Revolver).
Conclusion: The Beatles were a pop-rock band that, for a brief periodfunctioned as a boy band in terms of marketing and audience reaction, but they were not manufactured as one. They are often described as the template for later, more manufactured groups.

Boybandfag BTFO as usual. KWAB

>>129574173
stop posting this shit

>>129564015
I used to do this all the time

>>129575763
stop crying in every beatles thread and he wouldn't have to