Thread #1490707
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/feb/19/police-former-prince-a ndrew-mountbatten-windsor-sandringh am
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office by police investigating the former prince’s dealings with the convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Photographs of unmarked police cars and plainclothes officers at Wood Farm on the Sandringham estate emerged just after 8am on Thursday. Mountbatten-Windsor has been living at Wood Farm for almost three weeks after leaving the Royal Lodge in Windsor.
A statement from Thames Valley police said: “We have today (19/2) arrested a man in his 60s from Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office and are carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk. The man remains in police custody at this time.”
Norfolk police confirmed they were supporting Thames Valley’s investigation.
Mountbatten-Windsor, who turned 66 on Thursday, has always denied any wrongdoing or accusations against him. Thames Valley is one of a number of police forces to have assessed allegations that resurfaced when the so-called Epstein files were published by the US Department of Justice.
The force previously said it was reviewing allegations that a woman was trafficked to the UK by Epstein to have a sexual encounter with Andrew, and claims he shared sensitive information with the disgraced financier while serving as the UK’s trade envoy.
Oliver Wright, the force’s assistant chief constable, said: “Following a thorough assessment, we have now opened an investigation into this allegation of misconduct in public office. It is important that we protect the integrity and objectivity of our investigation as we work with our partners to investigate this alleged offence. We understand the significant public interest in this case, and we will provide updates at the appropriate time.”
90 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>1490707
Wright previously said information was evaluated during an assessment phase to determine whether a criminal offence was suspected and a full investigation required. “Allegations of misconduct in public office involve particular complexities, and therefore an assessment must be conducted carefully and thoroughly,” he said. “While we cannot provide timescales over when a decision as to whether a criminal investigation will be opened, we can assure you that Thames Valley police is making progress as quickly as possible.”
The allegations stem from documents released by the US justice department relating to Epstein and his links to the rich and powerful. Emails released appeared to show Mountbatten-Windsor sharing reports of official visits to Hong Kong, Vietnam and Singapore.
One email, dated November 2010, appeared to be forwarded by the former duke to Epstein five minutes after it was sent by his then special adviser, Amir Patel. Another, seemingly sent on Christmas Eve 2010, included a confidential brief on investment opportunities in the reconstruction of Helmand province, Afghanistan.
Last October, amid growing anxiety within the royal household about the reputational risk to the monarchy caused by headlines concerning Mountbatten-Windsor’s friendship with Epstein, Buckingham Palace announced it would strip him of his royal titles.
It was also announced the former duke would move out of the Royal Lodge in Windsor.
Mountbatten-Windsor has been approached for comment.
>>
>>
>>
This shit going on while the US government continues to insist nobody touched any girls that isn't dead or in prison is a fucking joke.
America has a less representative government under Trump than a fucking monarchy.
>>
>>
>>
>>1490720
1. The UK is a monarchy
2. I'm not disagreeing with them just being mascots, but that doesn't really contradict the point since mascots are ALSO fiercely protected. Even a nominal monarchy is going to protect its monarch over the will of its subjects.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1490707
>probable extradition to US
What do you bet that Andrew will - in return for immunity - testify against Trump: the biggest fish.
Sammy 'The Bull' Gravano broke his oath of Omerta and testified against Mafia boss John Gotti in return for immunity against his being implicated in five murders, thus proof that as Teflon wore out for him, it can wear out for another Don.
>>
>>
Trump has eternal immunity. Even staunch Republicans in Congress get death threats if they fail to mention that Trump is the greatest leader in the history of the world. Just one slip up like that and the cult threatens their family.
>Massie is not suicidal.
>>
>>
>>1490726
This just seems like another cope to me
I was told that the Mueller Probe would bring down trump's presidency. That it would prove he was a Russian Agent.
After years of Mueller files we never got proof tying Trump's campaign to Russia. We never got a go between passing messages between trump's campaign and Russia. We got no proof of collusion.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1490746
Yes he did present proof of Trump’s crimes. Jack Smith just testified a couple months ago before congress that they presented proof of crimes to Bill Barr, Trump’s AG made a speech dismissing the investigation the day before releasing it. The republicans in congress voted to ignore the evidence and refused to hold Trump accountable. There is evidence of his crimes. It was presented. 5 minutes of research is all it takes to see it.
Bill Barr protected Trump just like Pam Bondi is protecting Trump now from his pedophile crimes. Same job new person doing it.
But your MAGA lies are much easier then facts.
>>
>>
Net & Ya-Hoo and/or Putin and/ or Clinton's have the pictures and/or videos of Trump raping the 13-year-old. These materials are not in the Epstein files, they never made their way into the my files
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1490804
Mods just need to ban you again for this shitty spamming, they've done it before https://archive.palanq.win/news/search/text/esl%20shill/deleted/delete d/
Every thread you are in where someone asks for proof of your wold unfounded claims you just start shittting it up until you get banned for spamming.
If only mods paid more attention to this board it might actually be decent and foster conversation rather than your incessant spamming every time someone wants you to prove a wild claim you've made
>>
>>
>>1490809
>so how many times have you been banned
Not once in the last year. Last ban was for shitposting a raw story article over a year ago.
Despite what the symptoms of your schizophrenic paranoia are leading you to believe, there are more than you or myself who have been posting in this thread.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1490745
Maybe the UK can convince him to snitch on Epstein and his business dealings in exchange for a lighter prison sentence. Tubby bastard has had a silver spoon in his mouth his whole life; jail will certainly not be agreeable to him.
>>
>>1490816
raped baby here
neither Trump or Clinton raped me
Trump couldn't get it up, and Clinton declined from the other room when I was offered to him
I thank God everyday I got to grow up an upraped baby because of Trumps impotence and Clinton's laziness
>>
>>
>>1490828
Let's face it, if trump is actually held accountable for all his crimes, they'll let him stay in his pedophile base in Florida rather putting him in prision.
Assuming he doesn't just steal the code word server and flee to russia.
>>
>>
>>1490854
Genuinely no fucking around honest to god serious; I feel there's a point where you are privy to so much dangerous and potentially damaging information that execution might be warranted. Especially when you have open interest in sharing them with foreign, hostile nations.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1490890
Well then be specific. Don't just say vaguely they are names in files. If you think most of Trump's administration is powerful pedos, name who is implicated.
There's a lot of evidence that Jimmy Savile is a serial pedophile. I don't know the same can be said of JD Vance or Marco Rubio
>>
>>1490891
So much cope, when UK can do what USA can't against Trump. That alone make US a laughingstock around the worldagain
>Andrew is a pedo, but Trump isn't, according to my opinion
Better change that opinion or you'll be a proven pedo protector too, >>1490886
Trump is in the Epstein Files. Either you want him thrown under the bus - as I do with all the diddlers mentioned in said files - or you condone pedophilia. Choose wisely.
>>
>>1490707
Debunked, Prince Andrew wasn't arrested, nor was he accused of anything in the Epstein case.
Furthermore, according to the UK law, a royal prince can't be arrested.
Furthermore, the accusations (mostly defamatory claims), targeting him were debunked in court. These accusations were contiguous, and so were completely irrelevant to the closed Jeffrey Epstein's case.
Furthermore, i typped "Epstein" in the search bar, so why was this misinformative thread shown ?
So /news/ oughtn't to spout the delusion of slop like theg*ardi*n who spouted lies, such as inaccurately claiming that there were other "Epstein's accomplices beside Maxwell Ghislaine, whereas it's fiction motivated by thegu*rd*an's antisemitism
>>
>>
>>
I'm the service manager of a South Florida GMC dealer. Been there 25 years. Epstein bought three Suburbans from our lot and had them serviced regularly by his staff. Sometimes he drive in by himself, but not often.
My name was on his speed dial and my name is in the files. Should I be worried?
>>
>>
>>1491071
its over
You should seriously talk to a lawyer or something about this tho, not fucking /news/. Everyone from his dentist to his barber are in the files and with the redactions: they are intentionally trying to make people like his grocers and his gardeners seem like suspects of interest while minimizing actual israeli and banking assets. That's why they redacted the people who were on the island but only redacted 2 victims. Contact a lawyer, not /news/, do it now.
>>
>>1491074
we are covered. In fact it's a running joke in these parts. Doordash drivers, car dealers (he had a bunch) ... he knew everyone. I never saw him myself, but he came in once in awhile and talked to the manager.
>>
>>1491075
No no I mean talk to a personal lawyer about it. I'm sure your agency has the best lawyer in the world but eventually the files are going to get unredacted and they're going to work their way up from the least important people all the way to the most important people.
You should get a personal lawyer unrelated to your company and unrelated to the situation at large (if you can find one) because what will happen is every person who is individually listed will start getting harassed by the media, news corps, protestors, etc. with no regard to context. As by design for how they're releasing them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1491097
>Either (check one):
>[x] You want all those diddlers mentioned in the Epstein Files thrown under the bus
>[ ] You're a pedophilia-condoning pedo protector
>Choose wisely,
Easy choice. The fallout from arresting people like Chuck Schumer, who Epstein donated to, Bill Clinton and many left wing entertainers would likely cripple Democrats.
>>
>>
>>
>>1491129
We got the phone call transcript of Trump with the leader of Ukraine which lead to Trump's impeachment. Do we have audio of a call between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein? Is there any logged call between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein in either direction?
>>
>>
>>1491129
>no correspondence with Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor
Well this part's not true. He really did sign his emails as the Duke of York.
>>1491132
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-claims-he-hasnt-sent-texts-email s-over-decade-1705430
>>
>>
>>1491126
>I'm fine with the first option. But
...you're still a pedophilia-supporting pedo-defending shill reduced to any & all forms of cope & excuses, other than wanting all - with no exceptions - diddlers mentioned in the Epstein Files destroyed for the crime of existing. Hey, I want Clinton & others mentioned in said files thrown under the bus too, and Democrats don't have a problem with that happening either. And that's the difference.
>not wanting Trump & co. thrown under the bus
It's not just you that's crippled with wrong opinions, but the GOP. There's a very good reason why they're known as the Gang Of Pedophiles with they still refusing to make child marriages illegal in certain states: and way before this whole Epstein Files scandal
>Trump associated with Epstein
>Trump in the Epstein Files
>no smoke without fire
>if you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear
>those who have done nothing wrong can ensure justice is done by ensuring those who do wrong - no exceptions - are thrown under the bus. Those who don't want evildoers thrown under the bus are defenders of those who are evil
I want Bill Clinton thrown under the bus. Your turn, Republicans who have done nothing wrong, otherwise not only are you defenders of evildoers, you're the evildoers too
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/name-every-republican-voted-kill-1 92718920.html
'Here’s the Name of Every Republican Who Voted to Kill Epstein Bill'
I wonder why they did...!
>>
>>1491136
I believe he does text.
http://archive.today/2023.01.26-102640/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01 /25/us/politics/trump-texting.html
>>
>>1491137
>Democrats don't have a problem with that happening either.
They had institutional support to protect Hunter Biden, up to and including censoring private citizens based on the assumption that his laptop was Russian disinformation. When in reality he was a degenerate that videotaped himself fucking underaged hookers while smoking crack. Which you probably defended.
>muh dick pics
You never cared about pedophiles or Epstein or anything else relating to Epstein until Trump became mentioned in the files. Because you're a low IQ retard that depends upon group consensus and your television to help you form a cogent political opinion, as evidenced by the fact that you didn't believe the Epstein files were real until the government disclosed them to the public, and still don't believe pizzagate is real.
I know this world is evil because fate has allowed you faggots to share a country with me and have some semblance of political power despite being vapid, soulless simulacrums of good and ordinary people, but without any of the morality that underpins that existence.
I take solace in knowing God is real, he hates demons, and that lying is betraying your existence to the world an immoral, inhuman animal.
>>
I want all diddlers in the Epstein Files - including Bill Clinton - thrown under the bus
>>1491140
>excuses excuses excuses, other than just saying 'I want diddler Donald J. Trump thrown under the bus for the crime of existing'
Pedophile-condoners go into the trash, along with their excuses for defending pedos.
>>
>>
>>
>>1491145
They had a chance to impeach Bill Clinton for his sexual misconduct
For some reason Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and Joe Biden were all still Democrats in office back during Clinton's presidency and impeachment and each one of them voted against holding Bill Clinton accountable through impeachment for his sexual misconduct
So when it mattered, they all supported him
16 years later. When his wife was running for President against Donald Trump, the media defended him to defend her as the nominee, every news channel but FOX was hoping she would win
>>
>>1491146
Which is why I say now 'Throw Bill Clinton under the bus': I can say that very easily. Now you say this, MAGAts: 'I want Trump thrown under the bus': you don't have the right to any excuses other than say that. Any replies - and you cannot say 'Replies' without the word Lies - with anything other than 'I want Trump thrown under the bus' exposes you for what you are: those just as evil as the evildoers in the Epstein Files.
>>
>>1491147
Yes. While Joe Biden was President republican politicians like Ted Cruz repeatedly tried to get Hunter Biden thrown under the bus for his legal impropriety, and those requests seemed impotent. The requests directed at trump to throw everyone under the bus including but not limited to prominent democrats doesn't seem to be swaying Trumps decision making
>>
I want Bill Clinton thrown under the bus ASAFP
>those who refuse to say the same about Trump are projecting & deflecting. Any excuses other than simply saying 'I want Trump thrown under the bus'
>posting anything other than 'I want Trump thrown under the bus'
Come to your own conclusions about those who refuse to say 'I want Trump thrown under the bus', everyone else in /news/.
>>
>>
>>
>>1491146
They tried to impeach bill for getting a bj while he was married. I do think a man should be impeached for raping kids and totally mismanaging the us government, causing massive amounts of damage we will never recover from. I don't think a man who handled the presidency semi-competently should be impeached for a blowie from a side-piece. You are a dishonest dipshit for making the comparison as if bill was implicated in a pedophile ring, as if they're even close to the same level of fucked up. Fuck you.
>>
>>1491160
It turns out Monica Lewinsky was just the tip of the iceberg of Clinton's sexual impropriety. Why weren't we investigating Clinton's relationship with Jeffery Epstein in the 1990s during the impeachment inquiries?
>>
>>
Pretty telling that places like the UK are arresting the pedophiles to protect the children.
While under trump, they are arresting the children and protecting the pedophiles.
>>1490876
>staged attempts
Fixed.
Kinda funny how those stopped the second he didn't need a boost in polling numbers to make it look like he didn't steal the election again.