Thread #1491446
Anonymous
US judge permanently blocks release of report on Trump documents case 02/23/26(Mon)21:06:06 No.1491446
US judge permanently blocks release of report on Trump documents case 02/23/26(Mon)21:06:06 No.1491446
US judge permanently blocks release of report on Trump documents case Anonymous 02/23/26(Mon)21:06:06 No.1491446 [Reply]▶
File: PI4NLZ3JGBMMNIXU4T24SLASY4.jpg (28.1 KB)
28.1 KB JPG
https://www.reuters.com/world/us-judge-permanently-blocks-release-repo rt-trump-documents-case-2026-02-23/
Feb 23 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge permanently barred the Justice Department on Monday from releasing a prosecutor's report on the criminal case accusing President Donald Trump of unlawfully retaining classified documents following his first term in office.
Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon found that releasing the report would be a "manifest injustice" to the Republican president and two former associates who were charged alongside him because it would detail substantial allegations of criminal wrongdoing in a case that never reached a jury.
Cannon, who Trump appointed to the bench in 2020, dismissed all the charges in 2024.
Trump was accused in the case pursued by Special Counsel Jack Smith of illegally storing documents related to U.S. national defense, including the American nuclear program, at his Mar-a-Lago social club and obstructing U.S. government efforts to retrieve the material. Cannon found that Smith had not been lawfully appointed by the Justice Department during Democratic former President Joe Biden's administration.
Disclosure of Smith's report "would contravene basic notions of fairness and justice in the process, where no adjudication of guilt has been reached following initiation of criminal charges," Cannon wrote in Monday's ruling.
The order means substantial information about one of the four criminal cases Trump faced in his years out of office may not be disclosed to the public.
9 RepliesView Thread
Showing all 9 replies.>>
>>1491446
>Disclosure of Smith's report "would contravene basic notions of fairness and justice in the process, where no adjudication of guilt has been reached following initiation of criminal charges,"
The findings where Smith testified he had absolute proof Trump was guilty?
Not a surprise
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1491492
>Smith's biggest mistake was not getting Cannon thrown off the case when she's clearly corrupt as hell.
Getting a judge thrown off a case is hard as fuck unfortunately. Even with Canon's obvious bias, that wouldn't be enough evidence for an appellate court. Judges give other judges the benefit of the doubt to protect themselves from the same systems of review.
His biggest mistake was filing the case in Florida even though that was technically the most proper venue because most of the elements of the crimes occurred there. Unfortunately, he is an honest man.
>>
>>
>>