Thread #1491737
Anonymous
Trump lays out case for possible attack on Iran in State of the Union 02/25/26(Wed)10:00:56 No.1491737
Trump lays out case for possible attack on Iran in State of the Union 02/25/26(Wed)10:00:56 No.1491737
Trump lays out case for possible attack on Iran in State of the Union Anonymous 02/25/26(Wed)10:00:56 No.1491737 [Reply]▶
File: IMG_20260225_105351.jpg (162 KB)
162 KB JPG
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/state-union-could-be-trumps-best-chan ce-sell-voters-iran-plans-2026-02-2 4/
WASHINGTON, Feb 24 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump briefly laid out his case for a possible attack on Iran in his State of the Union speech to Congress on Tuesday, saying he would not allow the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism to have a nuclear weapon.
Even while assembling a massive military force in the Middle East, Trump has done little to explain to the American public why he might be leading the U.S. into its most aggressive action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution.
In his speech, Trump pointed to Tehran's support for militant groups, its killing of protesters and the country's missile and nuclear programs as threats to the region and the United States.
"The (Iranian) regime and its murderous proxies have spread nothing but terrorism and death and hate," the Republican president said about 90 minutes into his annual address to a joint session of the Senate and House of Representatives.
He accused Iran of restarting its nuclear program, working to build missiles that "soon" would be capable of reaching the United States and of being responsible for roadside bombings that have killed U.S. service members and civilians.
Iranian state media have claimed that Tehran is developing a missile capable of reaching North America.
The run-up to Trump's address was overshadowed by the buildup of U.S. military forces in the Middle East and preparations for a possible conflict with Iran that could last for weeks if Tehran does not reach a deal to solve a longstanding dispute over its nuclear program.
Trump has repeatedly expressed frustration with negotiators' failure to reach an agreement. "They want to make a deal, but we haven't heard those secret words, 'We will never have a nuclear weapon,'" Trump said in his speech.
Iran says its nuclear research is for civilian energy production.
68 RepliesView Thread
>>
Trump also faulted the government in Tehran for the deaths of thousands of protesters during recent anti-government demonstrations, although the specific figure he cited - that 32,000 people had been killed - is much higher than most public estimates.
"What is claimed about Iran’s nuclear program, Iran’s intercontinental ballistic missile, and the number of people killed in the January unrest is nothing but the repetition of a series of big lies," Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said in a post on X on Wednesday.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio held a briefing on Iran hours before the speech for Congress' "Gang of Eight" - composed of the leaders of the Senate and House of Representatives and the two chambers' intelligence committees.
"First and foremost, if they want to do something in Iran - and who the hell knows what it is - they should make it public and discuss it with the public and not keep it in secret. When you do these military operations in secret, it always causes longer wars, tragedy, more expenses and mistake(s)," Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer told a press conference shortly before the classified session.
Advisers had urged Trump to focus on the economy, immigration and other domestic policy issues, and he devoted the lion's share of his nearly two-hour-long speech to such topics.
Trump and his fellow Republicans rose to the top of U.S. politics with the passionate support of a political base that embraces his "America First" policies and vow to end an era of "forever wars" like the long conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
But opinion polls show the party will struggle to keep control of Congress in November's midterm election.
Polls also show Americans wary of foreign conflicts. A Reuters/Ipsos poll from January showed 69% of Americans agreed with a statement the U.S. should only use its military when facing a direct and imminent threat, while 18% disagreed and the rest weren't sure or didn't answer the question.
>>
Trump ordered strikes on Iran last year, claiming in July that they had "obliterated" the country's nuclear facilities. His aides have claimed more recently that Iran is very close to having the ability to make nuclear bombs.
Trump addressed the issue in Tuesday's speech, saying, "They (Iran's leaders) want to start all over again, and are, at this moment again pursuing their sinister ambitions."
Trump said he preferred to make peace, listing a range of worldwide conflicts he takes credit for ending, or easing.
"As president, I will make peace wherever I can, but I will never hesitate to confront threats to America wherever we must," Trump said.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1491737
Wow we are bringing democracy to these savages and introducing LGBT principles. All at the low low cost of protecting pedophiles (of which the epstein files are a hoax) and providing a small monthly donation of a few billion taxdollars to israel (this is how we drain the swamp).
I think this is a good deal and we should sacrifice as many american lives as necessary to ensure this is front page news.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1491808
I think Merrick Garland did deny the files existed
Which is why he never had to answer questions about the files like Pam Bondi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_8jHpldg94
He testified before congress for 4.5 hours and not one question about Epstein, or his progress on prosecuting pedos in the files
>>
>>1491809
>He testified before congress for 4.5 hours and not one question about Epstein, or his progress on prosecuting pedos in the files
That's on Congress, though to be fair, neither he nor Biden raised the question then tried to shut the book completely after saying how much there was.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1491838
They're not comparable.
Most people don't realize the implicates of the files we already have, e.g that voting doesn't matter anymore due to the fact that all US politicians are held hostage by an international blackmail scheme. Whatever they're hiding must be worse than that.
>>
>>
>>
>>1491851
Fucking this. The idea that "oh these people will never be punished" literally is the main thing preventing them from being punished. Don't let their fucking manufactured apathy stop them from facing consequences. We can and will throw these fucks where they belong.
>>
>>1491851
>a member
Anon are you high
It's the entire political class of the western world that's implicated not just one guy
The files also confirmed the existence of blood libel among jewish billionaires. Why the fuck do you think arresting prince andrew is progress in the slightest
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
From the last three hours:
>Saudi Arabia boosts oil output, exports for US attack on Iran contingency
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/saudi-arabia-boosts-oil-output -exports-us-attack-iran-contingency -sources-say-2026-02-25/
>Rubio says Iran poses a “very grave threat” to the United States, is pursuing intercontinental ballistic missiles, and is attempting to develop conventional weapons designed to target America
https://x.com/FaytuksNetwork/status/2026795545080324332
https://x.com/clashreport/status/2026800968768045323
>US sees evidence Iran is trying to rebuild nuclear program
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/vp-vance-says-us-sees-eviden ce-iran-is-trying-rebuild-nuclear-w eapon-2026-02-25/
>>
>>1491860
Because America is beyond saving if someone like Trump can be openly corrupt without consequence and politicians like Pelosi can do all the insider trading they want without investigation. The entire system needs to be burnt down and rebuilt
>>
>>1491857
No, you're uninformed.
Epstein was having 'jerky' walked to his office and having it cooked up for him at all hours, transporting it in freezer bags across the globe, and having it served to guests for full meals.
You can look through the files yourself if you don't believe me.
>>
>>
>>1491877
>not worth taking seriously
The federal government is the primary source you abject fucking retard. They've admitted this was real. And even if the political class didn't individually go on the island, the ones who did know refused to disclose this info to the public for twenty years.
>>
>>
>>1491879
You mean the ones that you specifically choose to believe?
People like you are the reason why the Epstein files were so hard to talk about for the last twenty years. You can be shown primary evidence and your only recourse is to say 'well that just doesn't seem likely to me', and then go about your day like your own incredulity is the only thing stopping these things from being real.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1491918
I haven't seen them deny Cuba's claim that their ship was fired on after informing the boaters they were in Cuban waters, I assume there's video evidence or something equally damning
Maybe they're not dumb enough to immediately start shouting that its okay to fire on law enforcement officials doing their job
>>
>>1491920
I guarantee you it was some absolute fucking retards basically telling Cuban's border patrol to go fuck themselves because they're american and can do whatever they want. The type of shit that it legit would make them look worse to defend than not.
>>
>>1491920
I really doubt that they would care if Cuba had an actually good reason to shoot. Even if the boat was legit trespassing and refused to retreat, Trump and co might still try to spin it as an attack on innocent patriots.
They shot up that Minnesota women and called her a domestic terrorist so I don't put this as below them. I don't even like protestors but they were really trying to spin her as something she wasn't.
>>
>>1491906
Given the lack of saber rattling by trump's goons, all signs point to the people on the boat being US backed agitators that got caught by Cuba's boarder patrol and they thought they could win in a gun fight.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1492007
I am wrong actually. It appears that neoconservatives are simply anti-communist.
In that vein, most sane, normal, heterosexual people are neoconservative.
I guess I jump to conclusions because neoconservativsm is tied to George Bush Jr. in my mind. Bush Jr. era Republicans being mostly anti-Trump uniparty scumbags in league with Democrats.
>>
>>
>>1492013
Russia rebelled against Communism and won years ago.
In fact, communism has been destroyed everywhere it's been tried.
Neoconservativism was started by left wingers.
Here's a wikipedia article so you're more familiar with the term you're using:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism
>The term neoconservative was popularized in the United States during 1973 by the socialist leader Michael Harrington,
>The term itself was the product of a rejection among formerly self-identified liberals of what they considered a growing leftward, antimilitaristic turn of the Democratic Party in the 1970s. Neoconservatives perceived an ideological effort to distance the >Democratic Party and American liberalism from the hawkish Cold War liberalism as espoused by former Presidents Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson. After the Vietnam War, the anti-communist, internationalist and interventionist roots of this Cold War liberalism among the Left seemed increasingly brittle to the neoconservatives.
You're welcome.
>>
>>1492015
>Russia rebelled against Communism and won years ago.
LOL. becoming a corrupt shilhole with an even worse government model than communism isn't winning, but i guess it's your job to tell obvious lies, isn't it shill. i don't need any history lessons, you're literally not american
>>
>>1492018
>worse
There's nothing worse than communism. Russia was always corrupt and the corruption grew under communism.
Example: they aren't fucking starving to death anymore.
And this in now way excuses anything Russian politically, it's an indictment of communism.
Also you're off the point you were making, which appears to be, "I don't know anything about politics, but you should listen to me", as is usually what the liggerals are trying to tell people.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1492047
It would make their boat strikes look bad, but at the same time I doubt they'd care.
These are the people who said that Epstein files are a treasure trove of info on criminals waiting to be prosecuted, for years. Then they made a complete 180 and said the files were a hoax. No shame.