/news/ - Thread 1492187

Anonymous
Lutnick Photographed With Epstein in Bombshell Deleted File 02/27/26(Fri)01:04:13 No.1492187

Lutnick Photographed With Epstein in Bombshell Deleted File Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)01:04:13 No.1492187 [Reply]▶

File: 4E2IT4G3AJDQ7DAYORRTZVGT4I.jpg (153 KB)

https://www.thedailybeast.com/howard-lutnick-photographed-with-jeffrey-epstein-in-bombshell-deleted-file/

>A photo appearing to show Donald Trump’s commerce secretary Howard Lutnick with Jeffrey Epstein has been found in a downloaded cache of the Epstein Files—and apparently deleted from the official version.

>The picture seems to show the pedophile walking ahead of the financier on Little St. James island, where it was already known Lutnick had visited for a picnic with his wife and “his children and his nannies.”

>The picture was located by “jmail,” a site run by two tech workers who have created a searchable version of Epstein’s Gmail inbox by downloading all of the latest releases.

>The group posted a link on its “jmailarchive,” to the image, which shows a DOJ file name. The file name, EFTA01230639, does not match any results in the DOJ’s Epstein website, suggesting it has been deleted.

>When reached for comment, a DOJ official did not deny that Lutnick was in the photo.

>“This image was part of a batch of files that were flagged for nudity,” the official said. “The batch of thousands of images was pulled for review and is being uploaded with necessary redactions on a rolling basis. No files are being deleted.”

>The Commerce Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

>Lutnick, 64, has already been caught lying about his contacts with Epstein. The commerce secretary claimed in a MAGA-friendly podcast interview that he met Epstein only once, in 2005, when he and his wife moved in next door to him. He claimed he cut off all contact after that year.

>But files released by the Justice Department showed that Lutnick and Epstein traded emails years after Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor in 2008.

>Some of those messages were for arranging calls and lunches—including on the pedophile’s island playground, where victims have said they were sexually abused.

28 RepliesView Thread

Showing all 28 replies.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)01:20:48 No.1492202

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)01:20:48 No.1492202▶

>Lutnick is already under pressure from Trump, who has confronted him not over the files, but because he is “p---ing off” staff in other departments, Politico reported.

>Current and former Trump administration officials told the outlet that Lutnick’s habit of making his staff obtain his permission before contacting other agencies, for instance, has become a headache.

>“No one’s allowed to talk to the interagency without Howard giving explicit approval,” one administration official said. “Even when his staff show up to meetings at the White House, they’re under a gag order, and they literally just say, ‘Hi, I don’t have a position from the Secretary on this, so Commerce has no position at this time.’”

>Colleagues also said Lutnick tends to involve himself in deals where he has minimal expertise just to claim a win for himself, and that he “shouts over” others who may disagree with him in meetings.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)04:59:52 No.1492273

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)04:59:52 No.1492273▶

>>1492187
>Destruction of official documents
Imagine how much shit trump had deleted of himself if he's doing it for his goons.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)05:02:00 No.1492274

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)05:02:00 No.1492274▶

>>1492273
If there was anything on Trump in those files, Biden would have released it. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)05:06:38 No.1492277

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)05:06:38 No.1492277▶

>>1492274
How many times does it have to be explained to you? Biden couldn't release the files because they were part of an ongoing investigation.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)05:11:04 No.1492278

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)05:11:04 No.1492278▶

>>1492277
>Biden couldn't release the files because they were part of an ongoing investigation.
Epstein died under Trump and Maxwell was convicted in 2021.

I know you need this conspiracy for your gay partisan politics. But for one single moment, lets be real about this shit.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)05:16:30 No.1492282

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)05:16:30 No.1492282▶

>>1492277
This, everyone else, but trump follows the rule of law.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)05:18:41 No.1492283

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)05:18:41 No.1492283▶

>>1492282
Maxwell went to jail in 2021. Y'all didnt give a shit about the files until Trump took office. If there was anything in those files that would take down Trump, the Biden would have either released them or leaked them.

Get real.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)05:27:13 No.1492284

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)05:27:13 No.1492284▶

>>1492277
you can explain it every five seconds, but unfortunately that will never make the shills acknowledge reality

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)05:32:25 No.1492285

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)05:32:25 No.1492285▶

>>1492284
Maybe stop responding to yourself and respond to one of my posts. That's how conversations work....

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)05:34:16 No.1492286

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)05:34:16 No.1492286▶

esl shill is projecting again

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)06:11:31 No.1492289

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)06:11:31 No.1492289▶

>>1492283
>This desperate to protect pedophiles like trump.
What did the Epstein class promise you?

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)07:37:32 No.1492292

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)07:37:32 No.1492292▶

>>1492289
What did the Epstein class promise Biden in exchange for his protection?

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)07:48:03 No.1492294

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)07:48:03 No.1492294▶

>well why didn't BIDEN release the files!? why didn't BIDEN prosecute the pedophles!?
Yeah, it's fucked up, he should have and we should be angrier that he didn't.
So why isn't Trump releasing all the files? Why is he censoring them so heavily? Why isn't he prosecuting the pedophiles?

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)08:40:29 No.1492300

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)08:40:29 No.1492300▶

>>1492292
>Whatabout
Curious how it's trump that destroyed the evidence

Extremely Stupid Liggeral
02/27/26(Fri)09:18:44 No.1492301

Extremely Stupid Liggeral 02/27/26(Fri)09:18:44 No.1492301▶

>>1492187
Dems seem super angry today.
The effects of being totally fucking owned by gRumpf's SOTU? Hemorrhoids flaring up? Who knows what's causing the uptick in not reporting the the real Epstein collaborators.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)14:47:02 No.1492347

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)14:47:02 No.1492347▶

>>1492301
>projection and inexplicable obsession
Jesus esl shill, you're really a russian aren't you

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)15:09:05 No.1492349

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)15:09:05 No.1492349▶

>>1492274
The Supreme Court only swatted down Ghislaine's final appeal of the case a few months before the election. Not enough time to properly redact victims' names and release before Trump got in.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)15:14:08 No.1492350

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)15:14:08 No.1492350▶

>>1492301
I see you got yourself a screen name. Not that you ever needed one because you're the only faggot on this board to keep using this fuckass 'liggeral' slop you made up.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)17:20:56 No.1492363

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)17:20:56 No.1492363▶

>>1492300
What is your evidence Trump destroyed the evidence?

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)18:12:52 No.1492369

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)18:12:52 No.1492369▶

>>1492363
I have none. Just like my party has no platform.

Anonymous
02/27/26(Fri)18:15:47 No.1492372

Anonymous 02/27/26(Fri)18:15:47 No.1492372▶

>>1492350
>liggeral is mad.
Oh no. I should spread the term, but I don't feel like it.

Anonymous
02/28/26(Sat)03:31:53 No.1492501

Anonymous 02/28/26(Sat)03:31:53 No.1492501▶

>>1492283
Nobody likes a hypocrite. If Biden had been hooting and hollering about the files for years before his election, then him not releasing them would have caused quite a stir.

Anonymous
02/28/26(Sat)03:55:03 No.1492514

Anonymous 02/28/26(Sat)03:55:03 No.1492514▶

>>1492501
Trump isnt releasing the files?

Anonymous
02/28/26(Sat)04:22:07 No.1492531

Anonymous 02/28/26(Sat)04:22:07 No.1492531▶

>>1492514
Correct

Anonymous
02/28/26(Sat)10:27:42 No.1492627

Anonymous 02/28/26(Sat)10:27:42 No.1492627▶

>>1492514
He was forced to do it by a veto proof majority

Anonymous
02/28/26(Sat)11:00:56 No.1492632

Anonymous 02/28/26(Sat)11:00:56 No.1492632▶

>>1492627
But his DOJ wasn't forced to finally do something about Epstein.

Anonymous
02/28/26(Sat)13:03:05 No.1492638

Anonymous 02/28/26(Sat)13:03:05 No.1492638▶

>>1492514
He dragged his feet for months, said “there’s nothing to see here” several times, and a lot of the files released are still heavily redacted

Anonymous
03/01/26(Sun)08:11:43 No.1492963

Anonymous 03/01/26(Sun)08:11:43 No.1492963▶

>>1492638
>Clinton
>Gates
Plenty to see so far. The problem is Dems trying to make this into Russiagate 2.0.

Subject
Name
Comment
File	Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)
CAPTCHA

Reply to Thread #1492187

🔍 Search & Sort