Thread #28864212
File: 20260302_192515.jpg (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB JPG
If i can get this kind of fuel economy in a 5.0 over 100km commuting in all traffic conditions over 100km on a wet day?
Ecocucks btfo
15 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>28864212
to appeal to people who don't have the money for the V8 but still want a Mustang.
what kind of dumb question is that?
not everyone needs a V8, some people buy cars just because they look nice but don't feel like spending that much on a big engine. and Ford realized they want to appeal to those people
>>
>>
>>
>>28864224
Mods make your car worth even less money, though. At least by just buying a more expensive car, you get a warranty and can retain some resale value, not that mustangs have particularly good resale value.
>>
>>
File: Screenshot_20260302_235832_Firefox.jpg (350.4 KB)
350.4 KB JPG
Imagine having a low credit score lol lmao even
>>
>>
>>28864212
Overall costs are lower. Much cheaper licensing and insurance costs here in Oz. 4 cylinder also sounds less anti-social.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: hqxr8wt6qzhb1.jpg (434.6 KB)
434.6 KB JPG
If the ecoBoost stang came out of any factory with jdm badge on it (and maybe some ricer bodykit), normies would be shitting themselves over a new "classic" sports car
>>
the ecoboost mustang and turbo camaro are really fun cars though. actually a good formula. take a good handling car and reduce the weight over the nose and change the weight bias and you have a better car. just because some phallus worshipping 5.0 enjoyer says you should've got the 5.0 doesn't actually mean shit. buy what you like. trying to impress others always ends with impressing yourself the least.
>>
File: 654fd757-d177-431c-b62e-cbec4d8c7b2a.jpg (747.6 KB)
747.6 KB JPG
>>28864212
When I was a young man, domestic V8s were for trailer trash and negros. When I think "V8 Mustang", I still think "redneck", so I would rather have the turbo 4, even if it is slower.