File: 2.jpg (2.1 MB)

2.1 MB JPG

>>4487003

File: 3.jpg (3 MB)

3 MB JPG

>>4487004

File: 4.jpg (2.5 MB)

2.5 MB JPG

>>4487005

>>4487003
I love the golden look in this

File: 5.jpg (3.2 MB)

3.2 MB JPG

>>4487006

File: 6.jpg (2.7 MB)

2.7 MB JPG

>>4487007
Thanks, that was indeed my favorite from the roll.

File: 7.jpg (1.9 MB)

1.9 MB JPG

>>4487009

File: 1.jpg (2.1 MB)

2.1 MB JPG

These last four are on Aerocolor IV.

File: 2.jpg (2.2 MB)

2.2 MB JPG

>>4487011

File: 3.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4487012

File: 4.jpg (2.4 MB)

2.4 MB JPG

>>4487013
Last one before I scan some more rolls.

Thanks for taking a look.

>>4487007
For me it's the composition that stands out

>>4487014
very nice indeed anon, thanks for posting. Love the overall look

>>4487015
>>4487016
Thanks, that's very kind from both of you.

Great colours anon, well done

File: 1200x630bb.jpg (80.4 KB)

80.4 KB JPG

>poverty
>back of the head
>literally empty walls
Its a leica alright

>>4487040
>Multiple photos of people looking straight at the camera
Are you blind anon?

>>4487039
Thank you!

>>4487061
Some people's obsession on this board with "photo is only good if subject is looking directly at your soul" is so goddamn funny to me lol.

>>4487061
Two, nigga TWO. and the rest are the usual run of the mill nothingburger empty street that this board is so obsessed with
>>4487158
kys assburgers

>>4487003
nice
>>4487004
aight
>>4487005
Uhh
>>4487014
eh

and the rest are shit
you didn't need to make a thread all for yourself but leicafags think they're the main character ig

>>4487158
Yeah. I'm surprised you even posted anything here knowing how utterly fucked and pointless this place is.

>>4487221
Two good shots with the subject facing the camera is still more photos than you've shared coward and you still have problems with photos that don't even have people on them. The photo with the window cleaners looks great with them facing away from the camera doing their job.
Stop whining you dweeb.

>>4487010
Do film cameras ever work correctly or nah.

>>4487010
Even garbage sets have good photos sometimes.

>>4487247
He's obviously fishing for (you)s

>>4487253
Since I always post an anon, you probably don't recognize me but I'll let you know you've by far complimented more of my photos than trashed them.

Thank you for your continued support and admiration of my work!

>>4487237
i think a set of 10+ pictyres is the perfect reason to make a new thread

>>4487253
I'm glad you liked that one, hadn't heard feedback one that one yet but it's one of my favorites.

Glad you're a fan!

>>4487545
No it has to be a new gearfag seethe fest or nothing else

>>4487040
>>4487221
>>4487237
Has anyone else noticed more of these kinds of posts recently? The dismissive ebonics posting that only shows up early in a given thread?

These aren't cutting-edge photos or anything, but they're pretty decent. It's good to see a photo thread, whatever the case. Makes me miss going out with a couple rolls of film and a 50mm on my camera.
Keep posting as you scan your rolls.

>>4487619
unc is mad that he is a shit photog lmao

>>4487619
Dont worry these creatures depend on AI for everything and dont count as people.

File: PXL_20251211_122006170.MP_1.jpg (141.4 KB)

141.4 KB JPG

i like these best
>>4487003
>>4487012
>>4487010
>>4487006
but its pretty good framing and decent enough subjects on all
good shit op, appreciate the thread

>Leica M3 + Nokton 50mm f.1.5
i've the same combo
how do you manage it comfortably? i shelved my Nokton in favour of a collapsible summicron
couldnt ever find a way to carry it comfortably, its almost the size of an average erect penis lmao
sorry for gearfagging

>>4487748
why do you have a Leica body with a voigtlander lens? What is the point other than flaunting a Leica

sup dogs

>>4487003
U like taken pics of men's asses lmfao
Hahahahaha

>>4487758
cuz he is a poor tard
>>4487792
this lmao

>>4487792
it's the only worthwhile subject. think about it rationally.

>he's back

>>4487799
Who?

File: 1.jpg (2.2 MB)

2.2 MB JPG

Scanned another roll of 250D.

File: 2.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4490418
>>4490418
>how do you manage it comfortably?
You have the version I of the lens, not the second one released in 2019 I have. The II is smaller so I have no issues.

File: 3.jpg (2.8 MB)

2.8 MB JPG

>>4490419
meant to quote >>4487748

File: 4.jpg (3.3 MB)

3.3 MB JPG

>>4490420

File: 5.jpg (2.5 MB)

2.5 MB JPG

>>4490421

File: 6.jpg (2.7 MB)

2.7 MB JPG

>>4490422

File: 7.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4490423
Last one from this roll. Until next scan.

File: 20251022_203827.jpg (2.1 MB)

2.1 MB JPG

>>4487748
And for reference, these are the best pics I have of mine that better shows its size. It's not big or bulky at all, I'd even say it's the perfect size for the M3.

I even use a lens hood on it, since the guideline blockage is small and doesn't bother me.

>>4490426
has M3 cloth shutter or titanium blades?

>>4490491
Cloth, which is why you gotta be careful pointing the lens towards the sun.

I had to replace mine originally when I had a CLA done.

File: NZF_6606.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4490553
yeah my old russian range finder has cloth shutter ... is more like cheese cloth shutter now. if I buy a new old rangefinder it will be with metal blade shutter.

>>4490426
second version sure looks a lot smaller
thanks anon

File: MFiles27-fastVoigtlander50s_jpr_P9170649.jpg (206.7 KB)

206.7 KB JPG

>>4490721
Yeah, it's actually even smaller than the Leica Summilux (#1 is Nokton II, #3 is Summilux).

It's just a really lovely lens that does 99% of the Summilux for a 1/6 of the price.

File: 1.jpg (2 MB)

2 MB JPG

Latest scan, this time 50D.

File: 7.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

Last one from this roll.

>>4487619
niggers stop posting at 5pm when they leave office

>>4493288
Thanks, bro. I also really enjoy that one.

>>4487758
>He doesn't know voigtlander lenses are optically on par if not better than lenses these days.

Love the colours in the 250D shots. They don't have a green tint that I see other people get from it. I hate green tints.

>>4493620
Right? I don't know how OP does it, these are bright and colorful with tasteful halation while any time I shoot vision3 it comes out with weird color cast that can't be easily fixed. Maybe he's using bona-fide ECN2 chemicals or is just better at scanning. I'll stick to gold and ultramax or the de-remjetted vision3, those come out ok.

>>4487005
Bro did you just post a pic of your mrs on a chins?

>>4487005
are you supposed to get models to bend their knees in a way that doesn't cause this?