Thread #4490365
File: OC246235_b.jpg (611.2 KB)
611.2 KB JPG
After much positive feedback to the /m43/ general I re-thought the whole thing. Why limit to one mount if the defining defining feature is the aspect ratio?
Let's have a /4:3/ general for all the based chads who shoot in 4:3 ratio!
Welcome: Everyone whose system shoots natively in 4:3!
Also welcome: Those who accept the superiority of 4:3 and crop their 3:2 (cringe) images to the 4:3 (based) ratio.
Not welcome: Everyone else.
Topic of the first /4:3/ general ever: Are 5:4 and 6:7 based, too? Or are they just tryhard?
Discuss!
135 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
File: OC185204_b.jpg (349.3 KB)
349.3 KB JPG
>>4490369
you're not welcome
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: imq7508.jpg (1.6 MB)
1.6 MB JPG
I like cropping my full frame to 4:3 and 5:4 most of the time. It seems like going for a more square composition activates something in my brain.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: OC236147_b.jpg (543 KB)
543 KB JPG
>>4490457
this is an aspect ratio thread. all gear faggotry not related to aspect ratio has to go to a /gear/ thread
keep on discussing anon.
I like 4:3. I also do like 5:4 - 5:4 is very based for printing as most commercially available image frames above baby size are for that aspect ratio and you don't need to crop before printing
>>
>>
File: OC225873 1_b.jpg (560.4 KB)
560.4 KB JPG
>>4490428
every time I try 1:1 I cringe. i have maybe 2 or 3 pictures a year I like in 1:1 more than in 4:3
>>
>>
File: OC225873_b.jpg (737.2 KB)
737.2 KB JPG
>>4490475
here's the building corners (very special to me) in 4:3
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 100S8774.jpg (3.8 MB)
3.8 MB JPG
i like 3:4 for portraits
>>
File: OC225849_b.jpg (530.4 KB)
530.4 KB JPG
>>4490489
>Very bad photos
>Very big egos
thanks anon. this is my instagram tagline now
>>
File: 100S9021_01web.jpg (1.3 MB)
1.3 MB JPG
i thought this would make a good backdrp for a portrait
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>4490498
>starts out with a very reasonable kit, z6ii and 50mm f1.8
>comes to /p/
>wants to fit in to (you)maxx
>tries doing gay urban photowalk shit to have an endless stream of /rpt/ grade garbage
>gets self conscious
>tries to solve that with a smaller camera
>manages to get a mile away from home without having a panic attack
>photos still suck
>switches to trolling about sensor sizes for hours
>tries to force wife to use a lumix gx9 (garbage camera with shit autofocus btw, she would have probably been better off with a sony)
>realizes m43 sucks, buys zf
>panic attacks return
>buys om5ii for JUST $1500
>$6000 and 6 hours of 4chan per day later and his wife divorces him
>now he’s also broke
>>
>>
File: OC266684_b.jpg (559.5 KB)
559.5 KB JPG
>>4490552
nah I post my good shit to insta. /p/ only gets the refuse :)
>>
File: OC266698_b.jpg (474.5 KB)
474.5 KB JPG
>>4490555
I'm sorry. You can complain to United Nations Assembly when Internet gets full because of me posting my images :)
>>
>>
>>
File: OC225871_b.jpg (692.9 KB)
692.9 KB JPG
>>4490561
>>4490567
thanks, my nophoto fans :)
>>
>>
File: OC205370_b.jpg (263.3 KB)
263.3 KB JPG
>>4490593
this is a 4:3 thread. it has nothing to do with m43. why are you retards spamming m43 shit all the time? go to your shitty gear cope threads
>>
>>
>>
File: OC205337_b.jpg (240.9 KB)
240.9 KB JPG
>>4490613
dont know. ask over in the gear thread
>>
>>
File: OC205330_b.jpg (266.3 KB)
266.3 KB JPG
>>4490617
i think it's a nice touch. you don't have to read it if you feel angry about it
>>
>>
File: OC185202_b.jpg (708.5 KB)
708.5 KB JPG
>>4490621
why shitposting? anon has an obvious gear related question. this is an aspect ratio related thread. anon should just ask his gear question in the gear thread.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: PXL_20251227_205757086.jpg (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB JPG
I got a feeling.. Somebody's watching me..
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: OC287246_b.jpg (406.7 KB)
406.7 KB JPG
today we had fogs and holy corners
>>
File: OC287297_b.jpg (607.8 KB)
607.8 KB JPG
>>4490820
god is so based
>>
File: OC287252_b.jpg (909.4 KB)
909.4 KB JPG
no jews allowed
>>
>>
>>
File: GR001129.jpg (3.6 MB)
3.6 MB JPG
>>4490823
It's the synagogue of satan that rules over them (and us) that needs segregation followed by condemnation. The time to separate the wheat from the tares is nigh.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>4490902
He is correct. Divorce was pushed by jews because it is literally how their religion handles marriage. Their religion also explicitly allows abortion. Now look at where attempts at banning medically unnecessary male infant circumcision go. And who is in charge of organizations insisting something that causes neurological damage and raises the infant mortality rate is actually healthy.
Now look at this guy instead of JUST the pharisees. He was greedy and prideful. And these goeth before a fall. He too denied Christ. Not in his words but in his heart. Jesus would find his camera neuroticism and greed for a perfect camera, his hours coping to convince himself this purchase is the last, pathetic. He had one good camera, what were the other five for?
All problems in society trace back to literally any individual, jew or not, who denies Christ, and does not live as a true Christian, and furthermore makes this everyone elses problem by propagandizing their sins as good if not necessary.
>>4490896
Who are you to complain about people you fit in with?
>>
>>4490820
this looks like the quality from a $150 dslr from 2007 or cheapie aps-c like a canon ef m, but your caption says it came from literally over $2000 of gear
what would jesus think of this, once he found out you used to use something cheaper and better, saw the wealth of cheaper and equally good and often better tools available, and saw your lack of charity, your pride and hubris?
i think if i handed jesus a $100 dslr+kit zoom he would take a better photo and give the camera to a homeless guy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: P1210253.jpg (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB JPG
>>4491935
check out my MFT photo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>4491995
NTA, I remember when I tried getting into M43 a few years back after trading in a 2010's Canon APS-C. I wouldn't have regretted it if the equipment was even *half* it's cost (taking inflation into account, the prices have more or less gone up proportionally - with even less incentive than ever).
>>
File: images (39).jpg (5.7 KB)
5.7 KB JPG
You know why you are a faggot if you shoot mft?
My full frame also Olympiss brand camera goes up to 170mm zoom but fits entirely on my pocket
Meanwhile your tiny eenie meenie sensor can't even fit that same focal length lens in your pocket. All the while providing zero bokeh and lower low light capabilities lol
>>
>>
Micro four thirds cameras are for pedophiles
Think about it. The obsession with reach. The obsession with cameras being noticeable. The hyperfocus on the retro toy-like models that would appeal more to children such as every 14 year old girl that uses instagram.
Dear god, taylor swift even has an em10. No wonder predators go for it.
>did you know taylor swift has this camera? i have more in my camper -average micro four talmudist
>>
File: 6575675656865.jpg (48.7 KB)
48.7 KB JPG
>>4492217
Fucking this. When will micropeen peen realize they have overpriced lenses?
This Olympissed poo poo made in pajeet lens is a 70-200 f/5.6 lens but cost more than a FF equivalent all the while having worst aperture
>>
File: 5675758.jpg (50.8 KB)
50.8 KB JPG
>>4492447
With a fraction of a price you could have bought a FF equivalent lens with higher aperture, sharpness, IQ, less coma, faster autofocus and so on.
>>
>>4492447
>80-300mm f/5.6 equiv. PRO LENS
>760g
>$1650
vs
>EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 Consoomer lens
>630g
>$400
So... spend 4x the money for worse AF, worse abberations, more weight, more distortion... Why? Can a Turder please actually argue a positive point to buying one of these things?
>>
>>
>>4492450
Mirrorless babbies are too unskilled to use DSLRs and can only accept the newest and best mfturd or the newest canon
Even snoy is too demanding for them and nikon is basically unusable
Someone post the om1 vs z8+400mm prime comparison where the cropped z8 looked exactly like the uncropped om1 with its $7000 zoom lens and the nikon setup was actually heavier
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_7163.jpg (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB JPG
here, a phone photo
>>
File: IMG_5326.jpg (913.4 KB)
913.4 KB JPG
>>4494003
Yet another
>>
File: IMG_1374.jpg (280.5 KB)
280.5 KB JPG
>>4494004
Another one
>>
File: IMG_1559.jpg (264.5 KB)
264.5 KB JPG
>>4494005
And here, the last phone photo
>>
>>4494003
>>4494004
>>4494005
>>4494006
Conclusion: I really like the 4:3 format and am glad, that smartphones also have this sensor ratio. For me 5:4 is also a top contender, but so far, I took better pictures with the 4:3 and 3:2 format. Maybe it is really how the format influences the choice of composition. With 1:1 and 4:3 it is quite easy to make a pleasing composition.
I‘d really like to try 7:6 someday…
>>
File: P1211729.jpg (2.4 MB)
2.4 MB JPG
>>
File: P1211692.jpg (2.4 MB)
2.4 MB JPG
>>4494836
>>
File: P1211679.jpg (2.3 MB)
2.3 MB JPG
>>4494838
>>
>>
File: P2171777.jpg (2.6 MB)
2.6 MB JPG
>>4494841
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 000487900002-1.jpg (4.6 MB)
4.6 MB JPG
>>4490365
First time posting.
>>
File: 000487900004-1.jpg (4.8 MB)
4.8 MB JPG
>>4499049