>>4491626
mogged easily by the Canon 5d mkii, I'm afraid.

>>4491628
Prove it.

>>4491628
Consider the fact that the d700 is still widely used by amateurs and professionals alike while nobody uses the 5d mkii today for anything.

File: F100glam_1.jpg (1.9 MB)

1.9 MB JPG

>>4491626

it was mogged before it even released by the Nikon F100.

And before you type whatever you are going to type simply look at these 2 flickr groups

d700:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/d700_discovery/pool/
f100:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/f100/pool/

The difference in quality of photos between the 2 groups is just astounding.

>>4491639
this is literally every film vs every digital that ever existed
apples to oranges

>>4491640

literally unmogged by any digital camera even to this day*
*mogged by most film cameras

>>4491639
I'm 10 pages deep on both when do I notice a difference? f100 just looks like you ran a d700 raw through a generic film preset in post

>>4491638
Considering that basically no d700s are still working and they have a dogshit plastic mount underneath the metal ring and they have sickening unusable colours, I'm going to say yeah, the 5dii mogs it in every way. Not to mention 5d2 has working autofocus, access to good lenses and is cheaper.

>t. professional still using 5d2

>>4491643
I was at a wedding last week and the photographer was using a d700 and a D7100

>>4491639
I love film so much bros

File: 7562057526.jpg (466.1 KB)

466.1 KB JPG

>>4491626
It's a shame that Nikon never made a proper successor. D750 feels like a plastic toy in comparison.

>>4491639
I remember back in the day it was the cheapest Nikon FF, but still went for +$2500 at the time, and I really wanted "FF", so I just picked up an F100 for under $200 instead.
>>4491628
Also remember back then D700 vs 5D2 was a common subject of every photo forum
Pretty crazy in hindsight that even with a 5D3, on Canon you could only spot meter off the center point (instead of any AF point with Nikon), all the more reasons BBF / focus and recompose was the standard

>>4491626

dear anon thats early cmos, nothing to write home about unless pic has content

>>4491644

say how many guests?

>>4491649

no you do not or
kodak you press the button and we do the rest

>>4491652

it was really bad canon bros could boast matrix bullet time canon and nikon bros were like muh 17-55mm 2.8 is versatile as any with ptlens

>>4491626
mogged by first gen mirrorless lmao

>>4491666
Prove it

>>4491669
No, you prove it doesn't. This whole thread is faggot tier no photo bullshit. The fact the industry has moved on from the D700 is proof enough that it belongs in the dust bin of history. Post photos that prove otherwise or stfu faggot.

>>4491695
>no u
>projection

Kek

>>4491666

first gen mirrorless had like 1.1 update for pdaf at somepoint?

>>4491626
>me, owning a D850
lmaoing@ur lyf

>>4491626
i had a d700 for a few months. didn't shoot with it much since it's quite cumbersome for edc but it was extremely high on the photo:price ratio. maybe unbeatable in this realm. don't remember exactly how much i got it for but it was probably like 200-$400 after adding the lens. very little money for a quick, durable camera that makes nice pictures. besides the bulk, my only annoyance was that it uses CF storage

>>4491719
The z7iis raw files all have a horrid green tint in capture one. Its really not that good of a camera. The autofocus is almost as bad as a foolji also.

D700 shines at high isos.
The noise looks good.

>>4491666
not first gen nikon lol

>>4491719
Can we see an example of a shot that demonstrates good color science to you?

>>4491721
mine don't. maybe you're retarded?

>>4491719
Holy shit this. Just open the d850 flickr group and any canon DSLRs and compare. Nikon has worse colors than sony. And they’re getting worse. Z5II colors even in raw look like a log gamma.

>>4491831
Did you forget to attach your example?

>>4491831
When I do this for the board, everyone just comes by saying you can't tell which is which because they may have been edited

Do you think if I grab a random selection from various brands flickr pools that you could tell the brands apart?

File: 11129188-1608227785298-e1d0936fee8fd.jpg (45.8 KB)

45.8 KB JPG

>LEAVE NIKON ALONE
>THE COLORS ARE NOT THAT BAD
>THE AUTOFOCUS IS NOT THAT BAD
>THE MOVE TO MAKE REPAIR OUTSIDE OF AUTHORIZED SERVICE CENTERS IMPOSSIBLE WAS NOT THAT BAD
>THE FIVE RECALLS IN Z MOUNT ALONE WERE NOT A BIG DEAL
>THEY'RE BETTER THAN CAMERAS USED TO BE IN SOME WAYS
>YOU SHOULD BE THANKFUL NIKON LETS YOU HAVE ANYTHING AT ALL
>AT LEAST THE MOUNT IS BIGGER THAN SNOY!

>>4491843
>TRVTHNVKE

>>4491843
lol it takes months to get nikons crap repaired now. they’re borderline disposable. third rate camera brand that markets to bird boomers

>>4491843
ally anyone's asking for is actual examples lol

>>4491628
>>4491626
>>4491666
The D3S says hello

>>4491632
You made the thread, you prove your claim, fag

>>4491732
The Z7 was a D850 with quirky focus, other than that the first gen was okay if you shot them as enthusiasts

>>4491651
My D750 still feels great, thank you very much

>>4491626
>12MP
lol
lmao even

>what is the d800

File: DSC_2792.jpg (4.1 MB)

4.1 MB JPG

D700 + Ikelite 200DL + Sugma EX 28/1.8