Thread #4497687
File: Z6P_1368-HDR.jpg (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB JPG
Here we go again
Previously: >>4495770
162 RepliesView Thread
>>
File: Z6P_0137.jpg (717.1 KB)
717.1 KB JPG
>>
File: DSC_3889.jpg (683.2 KB)
683.2 KB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9418.jpg (3.1 MB)
3.1 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9419.jpg (3.4 MB)
3.4 MB JPG
>>
>>
File: IMG_9422.jpg (3.3 MB)
3.3 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9423.jpg (3.8 MB)
3.8 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Z6P_1435.jpg (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB JPG
>>
File: Z6P_1473.jpg (3.4 MB)
3.4 MB JPG
>>
File: 1767185129650495.jpg (776 KB)
776 KB JPG
I tried buying a vintage lens - Takumar 50 1.4, entry level - for the first time and tested it in my back yard. I don't have a mount yet so just held it, but was very happy with the result for only ¥8000.
>>
>>
>>
File: Z6P_1490-HDR.jpg (3.4 MB)
3.4 MB JPG
>>
>>
File: IMG_9424.jpg (3.4 MB)
3.4 MB JPG
>>
>>
File: IMG_9427.jpg (3.3 MB)
3.3 MB JPG
Sorry about the dust spot
>>
File: IMG_9428.jpg (3.9 MB)
3.9 MB JPG
Not all heros wear capes
>>
File: IMG_9430.jpg (4.7 MB)
4.7 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: HPIM2284.jpg (930.8 KB)
930.8 KB JPG
>>
File: HPIM2306.jpg (975.3 KB)
975.3 KB JPG
>>
>>
File: Chicago.jpg (3.6 MB)
3.6 MB JPG
>>4497919
>>
>>
File: Chicago1.jpg (4.6 MB)
4.6 MB JPG
>>4497927
RF 24-105mm L lens + R8 + Glass UV Filter.
f4.0 and shot at 1/40 on IS. Had to hold my breath for each shot.
>>
>>
>>
File: 100S9745.jpg (3.2 MB)
3.2 MB JPG
>>4497890
clean
>>
File: IMG_9436.jpg (3.8 MB)
3.8 MB JPG
>>
>>
File: IMG_9439.jpg (4.3 MB)
4.3 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9441.jpg (3.1 MB)
3.1 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9442.jpg (4.3 MB)
4.3 MB JPG
>>
File: DSC_0013_DxO.jpg (4.4 MB)
4.4 MB JPG
>>
File: 4818 (1).jpg (1.9 MB)
1.9 MB JPG
>>
File: konicaminoltadimagez10bathriveravon.jpg (1.5 MB)
1.5 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9444.jpg (3.4 MB)
3.4 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9447.jpg (3.5 MB)
3.5 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9448.jpg (3.8 MB)
3.8 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9449.jpg (4.1 MB)
4.1 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9450.jpg (2.9 MB)
2.9 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_0210.jpg (2.7 MB)
2.7 MB JPG
>>
File: DSC_5827 copy.jpg (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB JPG
>>
File: DSC_6153 copy.jpg (1.4 MB)
1.4 MB JPG
I fucking hate overcast skies
>>
File: Picsart_26-02-08_19-13-47-827.jpg (1.3 MB)
1.3 MB JPG
>>
File: carroverde-1-15.jpg (229.1 KB)
229.1 KB JPG
Still learning to edit and take photos full manual, so this one was really bright. I like the composition though.
>>
File: snow light.jpg (491.8 KB)
491.8 KB JPG
>>
File: DSC03314.jpg (163.2 KB)
163.2 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: MDR_7678 edit 7x6 BW.jpg (2.5 MB)
2.5 MB JPG
>>
File: 1762715003117534.jpg (731.2 KB)
731.2 KB JPG
>>
File: DSCF36797961-Pano-3.jpg (3.9 MB)
3.9 MB JPG
Panorama of the valley below the Cerro Castillo in Chile
>>
>>
File: 100S9852.jpg (2.2 MB)
2.2 MB JPG
>>4498134
wish dof got either everything or nothing sharp. but it's a good shot
>>
File: 000021140015.jpg (2.2 MB)
2.2 MB JPG
>>
File: DSCN8318 s.jpg (643.1 KB)
643.1 KB JPG
>>4498344
Is the saturation bit too strong in this?
(Color is difficult. Shade, no clouds & sun low, so its all blue. Can it be not blue and better?)
>>
>>
File: DSC00247_8_9_Natural.jpg (2.9 MB)
2.9 MB JPG
>>
>>4498361
It’s quite high up and far away so there was some really strong blues from the atmosphere that was hard to correct. I noticed I fucked up some of the greens and there was some reds that bled after looking at it again which I fixed in a new version.
>>
>>
File: DSC_6394 copy 2.jpg (916.8 KB)
916.8 KB JPG
>>
File: 000021140010.jpg (1.9 MB)
1.9 MB JPG
>>
File: 000021140037.jpg (1.5 MB)
1.5 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: DSCF40468301-Edit2.jpg (1.9 MB)
1.9 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_1768.jpg (2.5 MB)
2.5 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: jerome-powell-shaking-his-head.gif (3.9 MB)
3.9 MB GIF
>>4498534
If you're not trolling you need some education
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1771892377154780.jpg (496.8 KB)
496.8 KB JPG
>>4498572
>>4498573
Lmao. Nice shot anon, here is how I would have framed it, the shrubbery doesnt do it for me
>>
File: IMG_20251104_091746852_AE.jpg (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>4498540
>>4498543
>>4498571
>>4498572
>>4498574
>>4498577
>>4498578
Pretty sure Burt has posted that same scene with full focus before.
The tilt-shift effect is kind of novel and you either like it or you don't, but doing some different should be embraced lest we all take the same boring landscape photos.
Either or, idk why you all need to argue over this shit like a bunch of women.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_4870-modified.jpg (300.7 KB)
300.7 KB JPG
>>
>>4498584
Architecture with a tilt shift for the last four years obviously for a very, very specific reason because I still don’t know quite what the fuck is going on when people make these toy city shots with them. I should really take five minutes and figure it out.
>>
>>4498584
t. the guy that don't understand the tilt shift
it's not that i don;t find it interesting it just looks wierd/unnatural. watched some yt videos about tilt shift lenses after your post and still don;t understand why the focus blur behaves like this in your foto.
in all tilt shift lenses pics i've see all look like macro pics. out of focus in front the subject, out of focus behind.
>>
>>4498701
>in all tilt shift lenses pics i've see all look like macro pics. out of focus in front the subject, out of focus behind.
See that's the thing. Using a T-S lens, that's sometimes the goal. To get a different look that you otherwise could not have any hope of replicating without the lens mechanisim. But~, T-S lenses have a couple of more "legitimate" uses.
>A
If you want to keep your f/stop low but you want to get things in focus that are not the same parallel distance from the camera sensor. You go form the plane of focus being a (mostly) straight line running parallel across your shot || to something angled that follows the objects you want in focus |/
(I couldnt find the pic I think of which is three green apples positioned on a table but all are in focus and everything off to the sides is not)
>B
Correcting perspective distortion. This is mostly for use in architectual shots. Software correction is also pretty good these days so it's less of a necessity but correcting it with optics (the T-S lens) avoids ruining pixel-level details.
>don;t understand why the focus blur behaves like this in your foto.
Your sensor is a flat rectangle. The image plane your lens projects is a flat circle. The two are designed in tandem to have the sensor capture the image the lens projects onto it. The image projection and sensor should be completely flat against each other in theory.
With a T-S lens you're moving the angle that the image projection lands on the sensor from 180* to something else like 150* or 200* (in either the X or Y axis). Only the portion of the image plane that still lines up on the sensor wafer is going to be in focus which is now no longer the whole projection.
>>
>>
>>
File: DSC_0090.jpg (4.6 MB)
4.6 MB JPG
>>4497986
What were the colours like in this one? i feel like b/w is not doing justice.
>>4498214
liked this one a lot
>>
File: IMG_6097.jpg (772.1 KB)
772.1 KB JPG
>>4498701
Tilt allows moving the plane of focus so that less of the frame is on focus ("macro effect") or get both foreground and background in focus with shallower actual depth of field (useful in large format landscapes). Dunno what was the intention here.
(Just a snap)
>>
File: IMG_9486.jpg (3.4 MB)
3.4 MB JPG
>>
>>4498839
>Dunno what was the intention here.
I was trying to isolate the bridge, but it turns out that miniaturisation is actually harder with a wider frame.
Too many reference points. I think it would have worked better on 45/85mm TS.
>>
>>
File: IMG_4899.jpg (618.7 KB)
618.7 KB JPG
>>
File: 1758213759859154.jpg (1.8 MB)
1.8 MB JPG
I'm not sure if it's cheating to provide context for a shot: I was trying to get a nice focus and angle on this ornament and in this single photo I happened to get a guy walking past, but I didn't notice who it was because I was occupied with my camera. When I turned around and went to walk off I recognized him as a homeless guy who I've seen around since at least 2014. I felt uncomfortable with the photo afterwards because I tend to be quite sensitive around homelessness, poverty etc.
I also think I butchered the lightroom editing.
>>4498851
I don't really know what I'm talking about but I think tilt shift tends to look more convincing when it's taken from above. I also would've brought the focus in a bit so that the pillars, road, water and maybe reflection are more in focus, and the trees behind the village and bridge are blurred. I don't know if you can do that with a tilt shift lens though.
>>
File: 1744284264251770.jpg (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: P1042472.jpg (424.2 KB)
424.2 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: P1042470.jpg (476.4 KB)
476.4 KB JPG
>>
File: P1042481.jpg (262.6 KB)
262.6 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: 100S9874.jpg (2.7 MB)
2.7 MB JPG
>>4498852
gorgeous.
>>4498750
very nice haze. framing feels a little in-between though.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: IMGP5405.jpg (1011.3 KB)
1011.3 KB JPG
>asian drivers
>>
>>
File: DSCF0799.jpg (4.9 MB)
4.9 MB JPG
From a recent night out.
>>
>>
File: DSC05366.jpg (4.3 MB)
4.3 MB JPG
>>4499077
>>
File: DSC05761.jpg (4.6 MB)
4.6 MB JPG
>>4499078
>>
File: FXE36496.jpg (3.1 MB)
3.1 MB JPG
>>
File: FXE36498.jpg (2.4 MB)
2.4 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_9502.jpg (3.9 MB)
3.9 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9503.jpg (2.1 MB)
2.1 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9504.jpg (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9506.jpg (3.7 MB)
3.7 MB JPG
I love how taxidermy really preserves an animal’s dignity
>>
File: IMG_9508.jpg (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 4567234234.jpg (2.2 MB)
2.2 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_9510.jpg (3.6 MB)
3.6 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9511.jpg (3.5 MB)
3.5 MB JPG
>>
File: ACR03320.jpg (315.9 KB)
315.9 KB JPG
>>
File: ACR03325~2.jpg (2.2 MB)
2.2 MB JPG
>>
File: IMG_9512.jpg (4.7 MB)
4.7 MB JPG
>>
>>
File: DSC_5288-2.jpg (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB JPG
come out and live
in a religious community
in a beautiful place out in the country
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_9513.jpg (3.3 MB)
3.3 MB JPG
>>
>>
File: Photo by the River Low Res.jpg (2.2 MB)
2.2 MB JPG
I nearly got ran over by a car, got the cops called on me, and almost pissed off a farmer to get this photo. Hopefully it was worth it.
>>
File: Christian Agitators-3.jpg (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB JPG