File: DSC_9083.jpg (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB JPG

old pic but recently processed

File: tall boys.jpg (1 MB)

1 MB JPG

>>4499929
>>4499930
love the tones
>>4499939
very nice

>>4500038
somethings wrong with the highlights in the whole set. blown, and then crushed to red. also why would you post 7?

File: DSC_2376-1-2.jpg (2.5 MB)

2.5 MB JPG

i know its fucking perfect, please

File: 1745238516772381.jpg (2.7 MB)

2.7 MB JPG

bright ass day today

>>4500042
My best guess is they were really overexposed and he tried to bring it down in post. Very strange considering it was low light.

File: DSCF42878508-HDR-Edit.jpg (73.8 KB)

73.8 KB JPG

Is this too dark?

>>4500112
For HDR? Yes, I'd up the overall exposure about half a stop.

File: 1769604696633026.jpg (742.7 KB)

742.7 KB JPG

I was just playing around at home but I really like how the diffusion looks in this picture. Only edit was -21 contrast

>>4499933
Really like this.

>>4499937
Peaceful.

>>4499939
Very very nice.

File: R1-05394-0008.jpg (4.4 MB)

4.4 MB JPG

>>4499956
pretty symmetry

File: _DSC0035.jpg (597.1 KB)

597.1 KB JPG

>>4499929

File: Picsart_26-03-07_13-21-58-536(1)(1).jpg (771.2 KB)

771.2 KB JPG

I'm not sure why this looks so off. Did I miss the focus?

>>4500277
The comment was meant for a different photo. This one I clearly missed the focus but to me it's still alright

File: 1742469219604488.jpg (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB JPG

I received a second hand GR2 sort of as a gift. I haven't taken it out yet but I've been really happy with it just messing around at home. I'm a bit conscious about the megapixel-age because I tend to pixel peep when checking that I got focus correct, but I usually downscale output anyway.

File: ziggy2.jpg (4.3 MB)

4.3 MB JPG

I used the lens in reverse
kinda cool

File: IMG_9546.jpg (4.2 MB)

4.2 MB JPG

Older I get, the more envious I become of scenes like this

File: IMG_9547.jpg (3.2 MB)

3.2 MB JPG

>>4500312

File: IMG_9549.jpg (3.6 MB)

3.6 MB JPG

>>4500313

>>4500315
I’d have never taken these pics when I was 20

File: 1734085040759243.jpg (37.2 KB)

37.2 KB JPG

I will never understand the allure of walking around everyday places and hastily snapping literally any non-moments of random people.
Who the fuck thinks like this? Who goes 'oh yeah let me just go out into a busy street and take photos of literally anything'?
Thank god the board is full of building corners and black and white asians because oh boy it would be a shame if we lost those.

>>4500328
Get well soon

File: IMGP0296.jpg (4.5 MB)

4.5 MB JPG

>>4500330
lmao

I like the amount of insights into each poster's life you get from just one photo :D

>>4500333
this is really nice those colours are great

Sup photo niggas

>>4500294
When you say “used in reverse” what do you mean?

>>4500367
Flip the lens around, like how a telescope sorta becomes a microscope when you look thru the other end

>>4500344
Sparkling photo, OP

keep it up

File: _MGC8754.jpg (4.3 MB)

4.3 MB JPG

Wake up early in the morning, anon, go out.

File: _MGC8753.jpg (4.9 MB)

4.9 MB JPG

>>4500396

>>4500391
cool

>>4499930
Where was this taken anon? it looks super familiar

File: _DSC7927.jpg (3.7 MB)

3.7 MB JPG

the sky looked pretty today

>>4500165
>Really like this.
Thank you!

File: dr5.jpg (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB JPG

Ah Manchester. What a shithole.

I've never owned a camera or even taken a photo

>>4500577
Then you’re in the right place

File: 000021060026 (1).jpg (995.4 KB)

995.4 KB JPG

>>4500574
>>4500575
So much culture and diversity. I especially love that red bicycle that's dangling from that window.

>>4500315
>>4500313
>>4500312
Love these

File: Z6P_2084-HDR.jpg (3 MB)

3 MB JPG

>>4499993
Thanks!
>>4500422 (checked)
Old Town Museum in Burlington, CO.

File: 100S9809.jpg (3.1 MB)

3.1 MB JPG

>>4500396
>Wake up early
that's a nice sky, but i'm not doing that

File: 1757363076537122.jpg (436.8 KB)

436.8 KB JPG

>>4500315
>>4500326
>>4500344
Saved
>>4499939
The grain seems too intense but saved

>>4500423
Nice colours

>>4500695
You know, to receive positive comments is one thing, but to have someone *save* the photo is really something else. I’m glad the images captured you. May I ask what you do with the images you save?

File: 1744467573170571.png (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB PNG

>>4500697
I save photos I like or think are good to help me learn. I only started doing this recently for /p/ stuff but have been doing it for /fa/ stuff for years

>>4500680
lazy.

File: IMGP1632.jpg (834.3 KB)

834.3 KB JPG

testing out some new lenses (pentax smc-k 35mm f3.5 + k70)

File: IMGP1624-2.jpg (898.1 KB)

898.1 KB JPG

>>4500751
super multi-coated takumar 55mm f1.8 m42 + k70

File: IMGP1606.jpg (560.8 KB)

560.8 KB JPG

>>4500752
same lens

File: IMGP1635.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

>>4500753
smc-k 35mm f3.5 + k70 again

File: Z6P_2065.jpg (4.6 MB)

4.6 MB JPG

>>4500790
Nice

File: IMG_1535.jpg (2.1 MB)

2.1 MB JPG

>>4499939
>>4500210
>>4500312
favorites :-)

File: DSC3682-2.jpg (657.7 KB)

657.7 KB JPG

>>4500695
>>4500698
>The grain seems too intense but saved
Feels nice to have a save worthy image to someone, starting a sort of inspiration folder is also a pretty neat idea.
Here's a no grain version for your folder, though there's still a little ISO noise, but I just tend not to denoise my images.

>>4500793
Damn just missed this from my reply. Thanks anon, I really like this one, it's got a good 80s seediness to it like something from Thief.

File: MAR_4757.jpg (1 MB)

1 MB JPG

trying something different where i underexpose by 1 stop and then boost by 0.5 in post. im really liking it what it does to the colors.

File: DSC_05004.jpg (635.1 KB)

635.1 KB JPG

How do I make 90's pictures in 2026?

>>4500832
what do you mean by "90s pictures"

File: 480673928_952656740341060_3697979591294679739_n.jpg (160.1 KB)

160.1 KB JPG

>>4500833
something like these

>>4500806
are you shooting film or is this digi?

>>4500834
Buy an olympus mju or some similiar 35mm point and shoot with a flash, load a roll of random color film, shoot cars at night, print, done.

>>4500835
Looks digital to me, though the "technique" makes no sense if op shoots raw. Id also say its a fuji, judging by the smeared tree branches

File: deers-1.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

are these deers okay

>>4500835
digi

>>4500842
>though the "technique" makes no sense if op shoots raw
does it not? it seems like it looks more natural when i underexpose and boost it rather than regular expose and take it down.
>Id also say its a fuji, judging by the smeared tree branches
nikon d3200 with a 35mm. i put sharpening to 0.

>>4500832
Softness is a big part. If using digital, you can manually focus and chances are it'll be slightly out of focus, so it'll give a nice softness. Everything after that is in editing, so probably
>reduce contrast
>up black point to make shadows matte (note in the photo the shadows aren't pitch black but more charcoal)
>color grade to your liking (maybe have an inspo picture nearby)
Pretty much done.

>>4500834
Same thing but with a flash. If you want to just no brainer the whole process, get an old P&S film camera with a flash and you're done. You can find them all over eBay for $20.

>>4499937
Beautiful, looks like a fantasy. What kinda film is this shot on?

>>4500914
nigga dont pretend like you don't now its a Ricoh GR

>>4500916
I'm a newb, the only cameras I know are the ones I own.

File: ACR03359 (1) (1).jpg (4.2 MB)

4.2 MB JPG

>>4499937
Thanks. The other anon is right, this was indeed shot on a GR3x in Barbados, immediately after a thunderstorm.

File: FXE36525.jpg (4.4 MB)

4.4 MB JPG

>>4500914
>>4500948
Meant to reply to this anon.

>>4500919
So how about posting some recent pictures you took with them

>>4500904
if youre shooting raw and if theres no blown highlights in the 'regular' exposure, then there basically shouldnt be any noticeable difference, defintiely not in what is essentially a half stop exposure difference. but you know, in the end, if you see a difference, kudos to you, shoot on, thats whats important
the only possibility that actually comes to my mind is that youre using some weird raw developer software and the exposure slider happens after some color corrections, but i dont think that even lightroom does that

>>4500806
>>4500904
I'm impressed that an old D3200 and a little editing can produce such a good film emulation.

>>4500962
bruh are you blind, looks nothing like film

>>4499929
Nice

>>4500948
Incredible color/timing

>>4500999
"You deal with me! VEGETABLE KING !"

File: _DSC0399.jpg (2.1 MB)

2.1 MB JPG

>>4500949
This is one of my most recent pics.

It's digital, but recently I was gifted a film camera so I'm trying to learn how to shoot with that.

>>4500993
>>4500995
>>4500996
>>4500999
>>4501001
>4501028
Finally some good fucking food

>>4501035
Food?

File: b9aaee29-e281-4b3b-baea-de944edd6522.jpg (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB JPG

Printing is fun

>>4501181
Hallelujah

>>4500344
>Anonymous

What camera do you use?

File: 100S9863.jpg (3.3 MB)

3.3 MB JPG

>>4501205
looks great!

File: b61be768-1842-480c-8596-50176b7ac709.jpg (258.2 KB)

258.2 KB JPG

Playing with streak filter

File: R1-05394-0028.jpg (486.3 KB)

486.3 KB JPG

>>4500695
ty its always funny to think my pictures are on a random pc somewhere

>>4500793
appreciate it its my first ever reel of film, found it a bit mediocre tbf but i liked that cactus room

>>4501231
Pentax K1 with one of them SMC 40mm pancake lenses, its the best thing ive bought - sold a Fuji X100VI to get it (boring brand imo) so worth it - that lens is really sharp when you want it to be, that pic is f5.6 1600iso

File: 5463.jpg (3.2 MB)

3.2 MB JPG

>>4500786
Very nice

>>4500791
Comfy, excellent light

>>4501018
The "Mr. Fixit" sign over the dilapidated building is great contrast, but I don't think the framing with the fence adds to the image. Also the WB seems a bit off.

>>4501055
The innocence of children is the only thing that gives life some meaning.

>>4500698
hey, you've got one of mine. that's nice. hope it helps you.

>>4501380
shadows are insanely lifted for my taste but i like it anyway and i respect the creative choice to lift that shit like Arnold even if thats not what i would've done lol. looks good.

File: IMG_0250_50.jpg (3.2 MB)

3.2 MB JPG

>>4499939
>>4499993
>>4500331
>>4500790
>4500793
>4500806
>4500890
>4500994
>4501018
>4501328
>4501380
my picks

File: 6EDEE1D5-197D-4730-9E3F-696D8E890C6F-compressed_Original.jpg (3.5 MB)

3.5 MB JPG

>>4501536

File: IMG_9612.jpg (2.6 MB)

2.6 MB JPG

>>4501537

File: DSCF4102.jpg (2.6 MB)

2.6 MB JPG

>>4500391
love this one

>>4499930
>>4499937
>>4500033
>>4500210
enjoyed these as well as other ones I'll highlight in a different post

any extensions you'd recommend for viewing images here? It's a bit annoying when they're bigger than the screen and I have to open them in a new tab (inb4 buy a bigger screen)

File: DSCF5393.jpg (1.7 MB)

1.7 MB JPG

>>4500326
>>4500331
>>4500344
>>4500423
others i enjoyed

File: IMG_9613.jpg (3.4 MB)

3.4 MB JPG

>>4501538

File: DSCF2795.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4500721
>>4500790
>>4500999
>>4501001
>>4501036
also these

>>4501539
that light at the top is killing it for me, definitely an example where the use of photoshop would be justified. really like the photo though.

File: bug2.png (4 MB)

4 MB PNG

Hi anons, this is the first photo I have ever posted to this board. I am an aspiring nature and wildlife photographer. How did I do? Canon T3i at 200mm (320mm FFE) with the kit lens.
I have already ordered a 300mm (480 FFE) lens because I was definitely limited when it comes to birds and other small animals.

File: rat.png (3.1 MB)

3.1 MB PNG

>>4501552
and here is another

>>4501552
300 on asp c is also not enough for birding and wildlife
T.300 on sony aspc

>>4501562
Unfortunately birding really needs 600+ for anything other than environmental portraits when birds are involved.
And who the fuck wants to carry that around.

>>4501542
nice

File: R1-05394-0001.jpg (4.3 MB)

4.3 MB JPG

>>4501495
dude I have no clue what im doing this film stuff is too old world for me

>>4501539
get 4chan X i wouldnt even use the site without it

File: DSCF2380.jpg (3 MB)

3 MB JPG

>>4501595
thanks, excellent shot too

>>4501596
Probably should've use a hot pixel filter bro.

>>4501595
very nice

>>4501543
disagree. i think the light ties the frame together

>>4501596
thanks im impressed by everything you posted + they all look quite familiar?

>>4501001
i keep coming back to this its such a great shot and timing its like everything was just perfect

File: DSCF3366.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

>>4501601
To be fair I feel weird even about using a denoiser, so photoshopping is usually out of the question

>>4501604
appreciate it! I got my first camera a few months ago and I discovered this board literally yesterday (migrated from /mu/ after an 8 year hiatus), so I doubt you'd see them anywhere

tried experimenting with movement to freeze subjects against a blurry background, didn't get much good results, but this pic had a bit of an early 00s vibe

File: 000081260033_corrected.jpg (4.5 MB)

4.5 MB JPG

hawaii is wild

>>4501631
is this film? love it

>>4501658
Sony A7V with one of the new film looks.

>>4501658
yeah its fuji 400 from a minolta freedom 160c
came out really good honestly

>>4501658
iPhone 17 with a film simulation in post

>>4500660
Looks like Linux mint wallpaper

>>4501386
>The "Mr. Fixit" sign over the dilapidated building is great contrast, but I don't think the framing with the fence adds to the image. Also the WB seems a bit off.
I was messing around in lightroom. Recently I've started liking making the WB lean towards a lavander/aquamarine color.