Thread #529655835
File: Screenshot_20260303_013537.jpg (459.2 KB)
459.2 KB JPG
Iranians mounted two lightweight motorcycle engines onto a large plastic aircraft capable of carrying 50 kilograms of explosives.
This seemingly crude contraption can achieve results as effective as missiles.
And it's cheap.
112 RepliesView Thread
>>
File: 1772380769332017.jpg (261.3 KB)
261.3 KB JPG
>>529655835
Yeah we knew that for the past couple years and we see them in the threads your trying to slide with your other 20 VPNs spamming low quality threads into the catalog right now, Amerimutt
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: akela-freedom-apkws-ii-03.jpg (210.9 KB)
210.9 KB JPG
>>529658010
image
>>
File: 76ijjjoj76.jpg (598.4 KB)
598.4 KB JPG
>>529657450
>instead of missiles
................not typically powered by propellers
>>
File: 1772381055564664.webm (238 KB)
238 KB WEBM
>>529657450
missiles don't have pilots retard
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_0129.jpg (37.4 KB)
37.4 KB JPG
>>529655835
Why do you think they took to calling them drones I wonder? A guided missile is a guided missile, whether it’s got a rocket motor, a turbine, a ramjet, or a piston engine.
Is it some MIC fuckery to get more funding for “next gen drones” or something? Or do you think the media just started calling them that because when people think drones they think of the Predator with the pusher prop on the back, and since this has a pusher prop it’s just automatically a drone? Or is it just a way to denigrate the technology, like “oh it’s just a drone, like the $50 crap you can buy on Amazon”?
>>
>>529655835
>Iranians mounted two lightweight motorcycle engines onto a large plastic aircraft capable of carrying 50 kilograms of explosives.
>This seemingly crude contraption can achieve results as effective as missiles.
>And it's cheap.
and how did iran obtain drone technology? let's see if any of you gifted children know the answer
>>
>>
>>529660246
so what you're saying is that iranians can build and maintain nuclear reactors and hypersonic icmbs, but a slow flying aircraft with plastic explosives in the fuselage is some kind of technological magic? your public schooling shows retard.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>529660246
Out of necessity, they had jack shit in terms of modern military armament aside from the limited equipment they could get from the russians/chinese. So they instead spammed cheap low tech shit like shaheds en masse. It's like turkish Bayraktar drones, they're basically reaper knockoffs but they're dirt cheap.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>529655835
>Iranians mounted two lightweight motorcycle engines onto a large plastic aircraft capable of carrying 50 kilograms of explosives.
Yet somehow it a technology that Ziggers could not come up with on their own
>>
>>529657450
Drones have the capability to loiter, can circle, change course, and wait for hours, while missiles follow a direct, programmed or commanded trajectory, and are jet or rocket propelled. The distinction would become a bit blurry with jet powered single use drones, Russia has, or had a few of those types.
>>
>>
>>529659811
In large part the problem is that the relevant anti-drone tech hasn't been produced/deployed in adequate numbers. They could have prepared better for this, incl. the Arab countries, but didn't. Trump pretty much said that they were surprised by Iran's reaction.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>529659733
>missiles don't have pilots
>i'll take gps for 500
also
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pigeon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>529655835
>>529656204
Memeflag vs Memeflag, both Israeli, both scared, trying to create a false dichotomy of "left vs right"
>>
File: 1768684289903780.png (128.8 KB)
128.8 KB PNG
>>529664071
For some reason I find the thought of an american version of this with a Milwaukee 8 just hilarious.
>inb4 hurr dhurr rotary engines.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 68e790ce70d76.jpg (3.1 MB)
3.1 MB JPG
>>529662256
Turkey got them now
>>
>>
File: lawnmower_vs_1billion radar_who_would_win.webm (706.5 KB)
706.5 KB WEBM
> glorified 30,000$ lawn-mower powered boomerang bomb
> billion $ radar installation
who would win?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>529665240
>amass al defenses to protect the masters
>they still get hit
>leave everything else unprotected
>it all gets destroyed
I thought it was the retarded muslims that were dumb at war and the US dominates in all matter of strategy?
>>
>>529665240
For fuck sake, thats a satcom terminal (wideband) in NSA Bahrain, not a radar. The 1B radar that was hit was in Qatar, you can see the hole in it on todays Maxar images, but its unverified.
Why the fuck people continue to think thats a radar stuck in amongst buildings equal in height to it is beyond me.
>>
>>
File: 1745973957604028.png (291.6 KB)
291.6 KB PNG
>>529665336
Consider the porsche-harley engine instead.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: ukraine china iran drone.jpg (493 KB)
493 KB JPG
these cheap "iranian" drones are actually produced in China. Assembled in Iran. Iran can't produce anything on its own
>>
File: iran FfLnGLkXoAcbiun.jpg (353.1 KB)
353.1 KB JPG
>>529666788
essentially a chinese-made engine, strapped to chinese composites, guided by chinese electronics. Iran has zero input in this.
>>
>>
>>
File: LUCAS_drone.jpg (594.4 KB)
594.4 KB JPG
>>529664316
The American copy of the Shaheed drones is called LUCAS and we have been using them against Iran in the current conflict.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1768879684831695.png (1.8 MB)
1.8 MB PNG
>>529666967
I'm well aware, I just found the prospect of domestic motorcycle engines being used for each country's variants rather amusing.
>>
File: HCbDRIcbgAAFi0B.jpg (183 KB)
183 KB JPG
This "israeli" hermes drone is shot down in Iran today. Essentially full of American subsystems
>>
>>
>>
File: DH.98_Mosquito.jpg (33 KB)
33 KB JPG
>>529655835
>Iranians mounted two lightweight motorcycle engines onto a large plastic aircraft capable of carrying 50 kilograms of explosives.
I think, there is some translation error. There is no two engines on Shahed. There is single engine. Also, it does not have two cylinders (which might explain why in original version there was "two" mentioned). But have 4 cylinders.
Price is not only thing, which gives its advantage. It is also, that a lot of parts are relatively low-tech, that it becomes easier to spread manufacturing among multiple assembly sites. It takes less time to train personnel for construction and assembly tasks.
It somehow resembles WW2, when in United Kingdom there was spare capacity for personel which had experience with working with wood, and they started to build planes with wooden fuselage.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>529655835
During World War 2, a single factory outside of Detroit would shovel raw materials into one side of their factory, and one new bomber would come out the other side every hour.
I agree that cheap one-way drones are a large part of the future of the worlds' military; but if it came down to it and the US had to get serious, we could knock out about 1000 of these each day, every day, until it ran out of targets.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: LL.jpg (266.1 KB)
266.1 KB JPG
>>529669574
>>529669601
I will limit how detailed an answer I give, because loose lips still sink ships; but the problem is nowhere near as complex as you think.
Excluding the infrastructure which already exists to assist the drones in their missions, the actual production of the drones is surprisingly easy; if you go into it with the knowledge that they're only designed to fly once.
>>
File: drone_OG_2.jpg (163.1 KB)
163.1 KB JPG
>>529655835
The shahed is a copy of an Israeli design from the 80s called the IAI Harpy, which was itself a copy of the Kentron ARD10 and Dornier DAR, which were loitering anti-radiation munitions instead of """guided""" attack drones.
>>
>>529655835
>build inside garages
>launch from a backyard
>no airfields
>no massive permanent factories
>decentralized supply chain and construction, can move weekly in a city building inside random motor garages
if the parts keep coming the drones keep launching, they have to lock down the sky extremely hard
even then they can fly super low under 100m and slip through as they have
>>
>>529670079
I know you're a NEET who has never worked a job, let alone anything in logistics, but huffing this much copium isn't a wise idea. It's going to take decades and pain, sacrifice and worm no one today is willing to endure.
>>
>>
>>529655835
>based on the Israeli Heron drone
>which is based on a US-West German anti-radar drone
>which was based on US tail pusher drone research in the late '60s
And then the press chortles and kvetches over the US continuing to make tail pusher drones.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>529673164
>aquafresh flag
>>
>>
File: Kettering_Bug.jpg (41.6 KB)
41.6 KB JPG
>>529673401
Air forces have been playing with this sort of thing since the first world war with the Kettering Bug, cheap and shitty drones/cruise missiles are nothing new.
It's also easy to forget just how innovative and capable the South African military industrial complex was during the apartheid years, hell, they even had a successful nuclear program and deployed half a dozen bombs.
>>
>>
>>
>>529667200
You shaheed knockoff is smaller than original and uses two cylinder engine made for drones and RC-planes. About third of the power output of local copy of kraut engine used by Iranians. Harder to detect by IR and acoustic signature.
>>
File: IMG_1472.jpg (49.4 KB)
49.4 KB JPG
>>529673035
No one cares you fruit loop
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>529680718
We're not talking about me doing anything. We're talking about the manufacturing capability of The United States, should it be called upon to supply a growing war.
Try to follow along better next time.