>>19990783
i forgot about the no rematches thing in the 3 stages of hell match. this is actually fucking ridiculous. i'm so tired of cawdy in the title scene.

see you tonight in the gamethread bro

>>19990791
The problem isn't Cody, it's the booking. Roman has been shoved down people's throats for years.

>>19990791
>>19990783
why do you retards keep saying this? the stipulation was that Drew couldn't get another title match if he lost to cody. Cody is getting the title match Friday because Drew cost him the elimination chamber. It's literally the easiest story to follow yet you want to complain anyway. Why is that? Just so you can say
>hurr derr you are defending WWE slop
when someone calls you a retard?

>>19990821
Nah the stipulation was Cody wouldn’t get a rematch

Well, what else was Nick going to do? Strip him of the belt outright? Drew screwed Cody out of 2 big matches and Nick was getting really sick of Drew's shit

>>19990843
>gets proven wrong
>doubles down on it
It was Drew doesnt get another rematch if he lost. Why would it be Cody when he had beaten drew 2-3 times before that match? Fucking anti-fed retards need to stop whining about shit that isn't even real

>>19991095
Drew came out the SD after he won the title and said he had an extra stipulation added saying Cody wouldn’t get a rematch as long as he’s champion

>>19990821
>>19991095
https://x.com/i/status/2027949291705180534
oink for me

Reminds me of Rhea stealing the contract and Adam going “fine you can be in the match”

>>19991136
>>19991150
>there will be no rematch you have to start from the bottom
So that's completely different from what you are claiming. Whiny smarks btfo again

>>19991095
>>19990821
https://x.com/TheMovementXx/status/2012258033984807338
Hey, stupid fucking braindead RETARD, what do you have to say to this?

>>19991136
>>19991150
You said it was part of the 3 stages of hell stip, i dont watch SD every week but good for you hatewatching every week and knowing all that goes on with a show you dont even like. Still, this can easily be dismissed as " you costed cody two #1 contenders matches so now Im forcing you to defend the belt against him." Still not a reach

>>19991175
Not getting a rematch doesn't mean you can never challenge again. What do you have to say fat cunt?

>>19991183
>lol I will literally illegally violate contractual terms because you made me angry
>This is good writing ackshually
Kill yourself you cum gargling swine.

>>19991183
ya seethin

>>19991175
NTA but he clearly says Cody has to start from the bottom, and he did that by winning the qualifier match and making it to EC all while drew kept trying to sabotage him... drew has nobody to blame for this but himself. the idea that cody was unconditionally prohibited from ever getting a rematch is totally made up schizobabble.

>>19991191
Hey retard. Answer me this.
Where has Cody earned the right to fight for the title again?

>>19991206
>cody was unconditionally prohibited from ever getting a rematch is
exactly what happened in the stipulation. Next question.

>>19991208
By almost winning the chamber until drew screwed him over. Lmao smarks are so easy to argue with

>>19991219
>exactly what happened in the stipulation
show us the contract

>>19991221
Is EC a no dq match, yes or no?

>>19991230
He screwed him over in the rumble and EC which pissed off Aldis who had the power to make Drew defend the belt against him. Let it go. Not everything has to be a fed bad gotcha moment

>>19990783
Maybe you should do something you enjoy instead of religiously watching a show that you don't like.

>>19991243
Notice how you didn't answer the question.

>>19991230
Is the ring caged off yes or no

File: codeman.png (580 KB)

580 KB PNG

>makes the brainlets on /pw/ SEETHE
Based Codeman working the obese brown neckbeards into a frothing shoot once more

>>19991196
NTA, but if Cody couldn't challenge Drew at all, then he wouldn't have been in the EC qualifying match in the first place.

>>19991263
The cage can be opened, next question retard.
>>19991269
Qualifications and rematches are different things and you know damn well they are. Or will you make a third post saying you're "NTA"?

>>19991252
What does no dq have to do with it? The champion is literally interfering with a specific person to keep them from winning. Why shouldn't they be punished and forced to defend the belt against them? Because he had a no automatic rematch clause in the contract? It's not an automatic rematch anymore at this point. Let it go

>>19991280
You're so close to getting it champ. Keep it up! I know you have three braincells, but if you try really hard, you can figure it out!

>>19991279
>The cage can be opened, next question retard
Were you dropped on your head as a child?

>>19991246
Yes, maybe you should do that.

the anon defending sloppy booking itt is just pathetic lmao

>>19991289
I already did, you are the one who desparately needs this dopamine hit of "fed bad." You don't even have any counter arguments anymore

the schizo anon crying itt that cody's getting his belt back is absolutely coping and seething lmao

>>19991310
>I already did
>still doesn't get it
if you're stupid just say that lol

>>19991300
If you didn't have breakfast this morning, how would that make you feel?

File: sage.png (251.1 KB)

251.1 KB PNG

>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I WANTED DREW VS ORTON AT MANIAAAAAAAA NOOOOOOO

Smarks got BTFO in this thread kek

>>19991318
Having a no automatic rematch clause doesnt mean you are allowed to interfere to keep someone from earning a rematch without punishment. I agree. Nothing more needs to be said. We all get it now.

>>19991343
So close and yet still so far. How does he do it?

File: tantrum-christian.mp4 (3.6 MB)

3.6 MB MP4

>NOOOOOOOOOO I WANT CODY BACK AGAIN I DON'T CARE IF IT'S BAD WRITING STOP FUCKING POINTING IT OUT DON'T CRITICIZE MY SLOP NOWNOWNOWNOWNOWNOWNOWNOWNOWNOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>19991437
There has been a good argument put forth as to why it makes sense. Please elaborate on why it doesn't instead of acting so obviously gotten to

>>19991507
>>19991329
There has been a good argument put forth as to why it makes no sense. Please elaborate on why it doesn't instead of acting so obviously gotten to

>>19990783
Better than Adam Pearce pretending he didn't see Drew McIntyre entire the Chamber and smash the title into Cody's head, no?

>>19991183
>just make up the storyline in your head bro then it makes sense
kek
KEK

>>19991279
>Qualifications and rematches are different things and you know damn well they are
So what if he qualified for the rematch, he'd be disallowed it anyway making his involvement null? What does this even mean

>There has been a good argument put forth as to why it makes no sense.
>There has been a good argument
>good arguments include:
>outright denial
>ad hominem
>strawmen
>headcanon
>obvious trolling

>>19991556
You forgot the NTA part lil bro

>>19991307
it's so grim.

An easy pivot would have been Drew screwed Cody from getting to Chamber, Aldis has enough and does Cody vs Jacob vs Drew. Cody wins, Randy wins the Chamber.

>>19991562
your shit got debunked. Move on to a different thread lil bro

>>19991755
Greentexting in all caps your projection isn't a debunking

>>19991653
I accept your concession

>>19991780
Dunno where the fuck you saw greentext or caps in that post

>>19991150
>>19991175
/thread

>>19991811
Yea this isn't an automatic rematch though, lil bro

>>19991095
God imagine being this confidently wrong
What a retard

>There has been a good argument put forth as to why it makes sense.
>There has been a good argument
>good arguments include:
>outright denial
>ad hominem
>strawmen
>headcanon
>obvious trolling

>>19991183
>huh it makes sense as long as you don’t watch the weekly TV that directly contradicts it and headcanon to fill in the gaps
Kek what a mark

>>19991820
Your shit got debunked, move on

>>19991814
>automatic rematch
that wasn't the clause. no rematch with drew for the world title.
a fucking 3 stages of hell is obviously the blow off. going back on that stipulation, not even a month later, after Cody lost 2 opportunities to become number contender, is retarded and bad booking.
keep oinking, though

>>19991938
He lost because the champion directly interfered costing him both matches thus causing the general manager to punish him by making him defend the belt against the person he interfered with. Checkmate

>>19991938
Stop watching then since it bothers you so much.

>>19990783
This is how they shoehorn cody into the main event

>>19991827
>>19991562
Your shit got debunked, move on piggy
>>19991948
Yeah you should stop watching piggy
>>19991946
>suddenly aldis can illegally violate contracts
lol

>>19991979
I watch WWE because I enjoy it. You seem to hate it, but you seem to devote your life to watching it anyway.

>>19991996
He's gonna claim he hasn't watched since 2001 or some shit even though he's crying about something that happened on smackdown 3 weeks ago

>>19991996
you can enjoy it without trying to justifying obvious plot holes and bad writing

>>19992021
I don't consider the writing to be bad, and I understand the reason in the storyline why the match is happening, and it makes sense to me.

>>19992026
That's because you were dropped on your head as an infant

>>19991996
Classic case of clinical retardation and stockholm syndrome. Sad!

>>19992021
He's right, they're not plot holes. You got raped because you have a sub-jeet IQ and can't parse two parralel ideas such as
>Drew can not have a rematch but Cody can

>>19991150
>>19991175
cody did start from the bottom again, he got into the ec, drew interfered and then drew got punished for interfering in the form of cody getting another match since he was in the last two anyway
i think it's dumb to just give cody another shot right after the ec and makes the ec feel pointless but there are no contradictions with the 3 stages match

File: 1761322076897224.jpg (146.3 KB)

146.3 KB JPG

Just to think
The booking will only get worse from here

>>19992075
You still haven't figured it out yet

>>19992126
monitor on please

>book a 3 stages of hell match on Smackdown with a no rematch clause for the world title to build to a singles world title match
who booked this shit

>>19992130
I accept your concession

I get people are sick of Cody/Drew, but it makes sense in this instance.

>>19992075
Dont bother explaining it, this guy is a sad lonely bastard who just wants attention

>>19991979
>suddenly aldis can illegally violate contracts
still waiting for this btw >>19991225

>>19991196
OH MY SCIENCE! IT'S HECKING ILLEGAL?

>>19990783
Wrestling has more than one nepobaby
DUNUNUNUNUNUNUNUNUNUNUNUUNUNU

EGOISM, IN MY SOUL
I HAVE CREATIVE CONTROL
MANIA'S NOW ALWAYS ABOUT ME
CROWD'S NOT HERE, THEY HAD TO GO
SICK OF ME CLOSING THE SHOW
OUT OF IDEAS, HUNTER'S COOKED, HE BLOWS
WHOA OHHH

MY FATHER SAID, WHEN I WAS YOUNGER
NEVER GIVE UP THE MAIN EVENT (MAIN EVENT)

THEY TOOK MY BELT AWAY, I'LL TAKE DREW'S BELT AWAY
CAN'T TAKE MY SPOTLIGHT
SUCK UP TO THE GAME, CAUSE I'VE A FAMILY NAME
MY BOOKING IS SHITE
NOW PUNKS KEKED BY ME
WRESTLEMANIA'S SPELLED 'CODY'
I'LL MAIN EVENT UNTIL THE END
I NEED THE SPOTLIGHT

Just enjoy fun catchphrases and epic entrances guys the stories don't actually have to make sense

>>19992395
story makes sense though
>drew said cody wont get an immediate rematch has to claw his way back into the title picture
>fair enough
>drew then tries to sabotage cody's attempts every chance he gets
>eventually backfires on him and now the powers that be have forced him to face cody

>>19992395
Hey Paul. Taking a break from Steph and Chyna 2.0 buckbreaking you?

>>19992281
>>19992284
You're a bit stupid aren't you?

>>19992445
you're the one talking about muh illegal contract in your favourite scripted live soap opera

>>19992451
>Mmmm yes daddy me no care about writing, me want slop pop, boring matches and nonsensical storylines!
Oink status?

>>19992451
>it shouldnt even try to make sense just give me viral moments and entrances with aura
People like (you) ruined wrestling

>>19992543
>it shouldnt even try to make sense
but it does make sense, unless you live on planet retard

>>19992547
Good joke bro