File: IMG_8051.jpg (985.3 KB)

985.3 KB JPG

>>84047879
Incels will say they no and that they prefer natural breasts, despite the fact almost all the (((natural))) pornstars, e-girls and female celebs they jack off to have implants.

>>84047879
>92KG aka 202lbs
Damn this birth must be yuge.

>>84047879
i have had other plastic surgery (not a boob job) and moids legit cannot tell, they are so used to seeing fake boobs i doubt they would even notice

>>84047889
not true, i hate all celebs and avoid watching porn with fake breasts
i think it is obvious when they are fake

File: 1753349308468796.jpg (33 KB)

33 KB JPG

>>84047879
>Would robots date a girl with fake breasts?
I'll avoid any bimbo like the plague.
I would prefer she wasn't altered, agreed it is as gross as tats.
I prefer small boobs anyway
women complain about shit most guys dont care about, they're stuck in their social media crab buckets. guys 2 i presume.
i'm tall, white with a large penis and full head of hair tho if that matters.

>>84047879
I'd only date one short-term, just for fun
I'm a tits guy and I'd still prefer natural A cups to fake DD cups
I imagine that fakes aren't anywhere near as nice to the touch or as nice to fuck as the real deal

There are studies which find chestlets cheat more, they have excess T which makes them more disagreeable and whoreish.
Women with breast implants will always have bad personalities because they are still the same bitter chestlet whores inside.
Also encapsulated implants are gross and cause cancer and autoimmune illnesses. Plus you have to pay for them to be replaced every 10 years.

>>84047879
Big tits aren't the same thing as skin crayon scribbles

>>84047879
Never. Bimbo bitches are recreational use only

>>84047879
I generally prefer nice face, and nice looking ass/hips.

>>84047879
Sometimes they look alright but I've only touched them once in my life and they were hard like tennis balls. I assumed there'd be more squish. The term "bolt-ons" really fit well here.
The nipples and areola were still fine though.

>>84047879
No but not because I'd dislike playing with them. I think if a woman goes through with these operations, it shows where all her energy and attention goes. I think she is generally used to exploiting the male weakness to get through life and it shows weak mind and character. Women who are being prostitutes get a pass because there's no confusion about what they're doing. It's really all they have once they've entered that world.

Natural mommy milkers are preferred, I heard implants can interfere with lactation and I expect my future wife to take drugs to induce lactation so she is my little moocow. Lactation can add one to three cup sizes so if she's just a D cup there's still hope she might become hot after a little dairy fairy magic. That said anything smaller than an E is better off with implants than being a chestlet. Depends on the surgeon though. Nobody likes bolt ons, they need to be big and saggy. Big difference between saggy and droopy. And if she's not willing to make milk there's genuinely zero reasons not to get implants. If they don't get in the way of lactation I'd pay for the procedure, but I'd want some kind of stipulation like if she leaves me or cheats she has to give the implants back at her own cost. I'm not paying for someone else to enjoy them.

File: IMG_8131.gif (227.7 KB)

227.7 KB GIF

What's the point of breasts if they aren't soft and squishy?

>>84047879
No. It's deceptive, and it means my children inherit their weak genes so fake tits are disqualified.

I prefer flat. Much more

>>84047879
i dont care, just give me a slobbery tit job with your fake tits