Thread #16901903
Why were historical scientists so fucking weird Anonymous 01/30/26(Fri)18:57:42 No.16901903 [Reply]▶
File: IMG_8456.jpg (13.1 KB)
13.1 KB JPG
This is Paracelsus, a hermetic alchemist, or proto chemist; also the greatest natural physician of his day, and a father of mineral medicinals.
He believed he could produce a slave creation, or a familiar of sorts—the Homunculus—by ejaculating into a chicken egg, or worse.
— ‘That the sperm of a man be putrefied by itself in a sealed cucurbit for forty days with the highest degree of putrefaction in a horse's womb ["venter equinus", meaning "warm, fermenting horse dung"], or at least so long that it comes to life and moves itself, and stirs, which is easily observed. After this time, it will look somewhat like a man, but transparent, without a body. If, after this, it be fed wisely with the Arcanum of human blood, and be nourished for up to forty weeks, and be kept in the even heat of the horse's womb, a living human child grows therefrom, with all its members like another child, which is born of a woman, but much smaller.’ 328–329
The original coomer, if you will.
64 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>16901903
Before science became a business, you had to pretty retarded to dedicate your life to it. I mean you still are today, if you are intelligent enough for STEM you're intelligent enough to have a better career somewhere else, but still.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16901903
Back then the elite intellectuals were about as knowledgeable and smart as the average person today. That's why everyone on 4chan and twatter has retarded schizotheories as him. Give it another 500 years and everyone will sound like post-docs do today.
>>
File: _texas.jpg (16.4 KB)
16.4 KB JPG
>>16901903
>>
>>16901903
They were posers, just like scientists today, except back then posing meant pretending to have interesting and esoteric knowledge of forbidden things while today it means peddling the Current Thing harder than anyone else.
>>
File: Leibniz Stepped Reckoner.jpg (61.9 KB)
61.9 KB JPG
>>16901903
Basically what >>16901914 has mentioned
"Science" as this separate field of study we understand today didn't exist prior to the Enlightenment. Most "scientists" before this time were big on what we consider pseudoscience/nonsense like theology, astrology, alchemy, and other forms of mysticism. Even Newton, one of the smartest men to ever live, spent far more time trying to create the Philosopher’s Stone and figure out cryptic messages from the Bible, than studying mathematics and the laws of the universe.
>>16901940
Knowledge ≠ Intelligence
The average 15 year old knows more about medicine, geology, anthropology, astronomy, and any basic science today, than what historical intellectuals like Newton or Leibniz ever knew. But that's all accumulated knowledge. If they had to use raw brain power, than Newton and Leibniz would win. These two created Calculus, computing devices, and in Leibniz case, he came up with the idea of binary code and thinking machines centuries before electrical power existed.
>>
File: Teddy K Harvard.jpg (241.6 KB)
241.6 KB JPG
The scientific method and its consequences...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16901903
There wasn't a body that told them they couldn't. In other words, he was more free to experiment and do science in his own ways. Today there's peer review which you have to suck off their tranny cocks to get accepted as a "scientist". If you do you own research, you're considered a racist bigot.
>>
>>16902692
>he was more free to experiment and do science in his own ways
Sure, but do you figure he actually sealed the sperm of a man in a sealed cucurbit for forty days with the highest degree of putrefaction in a horse's womb until it came to life and moved itself?
>>
>>
>>
>>16902736
Thats why you replicate the study to the best of your ability. If you have a bone of scientist in you, you'll get this right. If you're a cargo cultist peer review guy, nothing can be done in anyway form or shape in any capacity by anyone with anything for any reason.
Excuses do not make science
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16905340
Technically we can transmute gold, it just costs more than it's worth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysopoeia
>>
>>
>>
>>16901903
The unknown presents infinite possibility.
Scientific discovery narrows the limits of possibility more and more over time.
It wasn't weird to think stuff like this might be possible back then.
Over time our knowledge boxes us in more and more until magic is completely extinguished and we are all replaced by robots and humanity has 0 possibility because extinct.
Scientific utopia is an Amazon warehouse of robots processing units of product for transport to other robots who immediately dump them into a landfill for maximum supply chain efficiency for the rest of all time.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16901903
It's not that crazy given the context.
These alchemists had a bunch of cultural myths and folk medicine behind them that people accepted as fact.
If your mythology involves a god that created a man from clay, of course when your early chemists discovered some actual chemical reactions by heating up rocks they're going to start fantasizing about unlocking the secrets of how said god created life.
Mysticism is just an endless chain of wild tales derived from our ancestors making false assumptions via observations, most of which probably came from circumstance, mental illness, failure to explain the natural world around them and anthropomorphize or symbolism (I.E How Chinese medicine just takes an animalistic trait such as an animal being violent, prescribes a body part and proposes you can obtain that quality by eating it such as eating tiger dick to cure ED).
Science didn't get really serious until the geniuses starting yielding impressive results, quackery falls behind because it repeatedly failed.
The Alchemist that actually achieves a useful chemical reaction gets validation, the guy cumming and bleeding all over random plants and smearing it on heated lead nets shit.
Eventually mankind realized "Maybe our jizz DOESN'T have anything to do with changing lead to gold and CAN'T create artificial slave humans"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
I mean, is it really that crazy? They had no idea what a woman's eggs are. They can see jizz with their eyes. The logical assumption based on their limited information would be that jizz somehow incubates in a woman's womb and becomes a proper person. Then they relate that process to chicken eggs which they could visually study which appeared to function as an external womb. Ergo, maybe if you jizzed in a chicken egg maybe it'd act like a surrogate womb, a technology that people to this day still research.
>>
>>16902080
>"Science" as this separate field of study we understand today didn't exist prior to the Enlightenment. Most "scientists" before this time were big on what we consider pseudoscience/nonsense like theology, astrology, alchemy, and other forms of mysticism. Even Newton, one of the smartest men to ever live, spent far more time trying to create the Philosopher’s Stone and figure out cryptic messages from the Bible, than studying mathematics and the laws of the universe.
Modern day scientists don’t want you to know any of this. They absolutely despise when you mention that Newton believed in magic. Like, you will get attacked for it.
>>
>>
>>16923989
Technology has already exceeded anything some medieval "magician" could do.
It is possible that humans can heal themselves from small injuries, but no limb regrowth. Although in the future crispr may enable that. Crispr tech could potentially enable humans to
>regrow limbs
>have diminished pain reception
>much greater strength
>>
>>16923691
I'd say the idea at the time was the thought of making something that was only "partly" human without free will or the emotional attachment of having a family member.
Plus you had all these myths of beings born from no mother, but by the life giving seed of a god, usually as some means of expressing some kind of "purity", like with Athena or Aphrodite.
Without a true lineage, a homunculus is without blood relation, there are zero attachments.
It's ultimately the mystical version of the actual scientifically feasible concept of creating a cloned human with the specific purpose of having zero loves ones and not being legally considered a human being, to exist as slave labor.