>>16917556
its been measured many times libtard

>>16917854
>he doesn't know about the two-way speed of light
Aether theory is making a huge comeback among intellectuals on youtube.
Einstein will be exposed as the fraud he is.

>>16917556
In 1999, physicist Lene Hau and her team at the Rowland Institute for Science successfully slowed light to roughly 38 mph by passing it through a Bose-Einstein condensate. This extreme slowing was achieved using ultracold sodium atoms in a vacuum, creating a medium that reduced the speed of light by a factor of over 20 million.

I don't see how there's a two-way issue with the measurement; you can see it.

>>16917556
Have you ever thought about not being a frog posting faggot? But this is the third dumbest thing about Einstein's relativity.

>Gur dur it's like a well

Ok so what's pulling it down?

>>16917875
so the speed of light is roughly 38 mph?

>destroys your city using e=mc2
Sounds like proof enough for me

>>16917856
Einstein and his long list of massive blunders never fails to make me laugh.

but is the speed of light a multiversal constant?

>>16917556
it isnt a constant either, it is a misnomer. It is an average

File: Cavalieri's Principle.gif (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB GIF

If light is made out of the same foundational building blocks that all matter is, just in a different shape configuration lending to its unique properties, than the speed of light is determined by the total quantity of base building blocks in existence, which is Pi, which is why the Planck constant exists

>>16917856
>intellectuals
>on youtube.

>>16918105
Acadummia is finished.

File: Exploding_Lighter_Fuel_In_encosed_Space.gif (2 MB)

2 MB GIF

By this point its been a decade since a bunch of lab coats filmed a pulse of light using a series of high speed cameras synced to gain enough of a framerate to see its illumination physically moving.
Its been so long, consumer advancements has been good enough that fucking mid end youtubers has tried to replicate this to various degrees for monetization of 1-3 videos.

If you can't tell the difference, it makes no difference.

>>16917556
you can measure the round trip time, but not the one-way time
you might wonder why not measure from both locations and compare them, but that leads to the synchronization problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_synchronisation
its just the usual anal nit-picking from soientists.

>>16918107
Sure, but that doesn't mean the goyslop you watch on the zoom zoom adhd website is any better

>>16917856
He mentioned it in his paper and explained why using an isotropic speed of light works thoughbeit. Maybe actually read and understand it

>>16918430
>light can travel faster in one direction because... it just can!

>>16920390
>the speed of light is constant because it just is chud
>jewstein told me

>>16917856
You're an idiot.
>>16917978
You are also an idiot.

>>16918430
>you can measure the round trip time, but not the one-way time
Why not just c = f x λ?

File: 1770525648774339.jpg (173.6 KB)

173.6 KB JPG

okay but if the speed of light was different in different directions then wouldn't there be no cmb in one direction?

File: 1762544770530030.jpg (31.8 KB)

31.8 KB JPG

>>16922005

>>16922005
>>16922005
>okay but if the speed of light was different in different directions
It's not, you observe redshift / blueshift on relative movements. That's because you couple the wave into the ether. Simple proof, missed for a century.
> then wouldn't there be no cmb in one direction?
Nobody knows cmb origin-

>>16922005
The lack of anisotropic distortion of the CMB is literally one of the main arguments against the YT clickbait trash.

File: cmb.png (1.7 MB)

1.7 MB PNG

>>16922005
Prove that all that noise isn't caused by differences in the speed of light traveling at that specific angle.

>>16922020
>Prove that all that noise isn't caused by differences in the speed of light traveling at that specific angle.
Mapping cmb uses high directional antennas. That avoids angled reception. Better idea maybe: The higher intensity areas are an outcome of "The Dome" reflections.

>>16917556
You can measure it to like +-10% with a microwave and a chocolate bar you retard

>>16920395
you have to go back

what if the speed of light isn't constant but it always appears constant to you as a slave to causality

File: 1752474020188646.jpg (67.8 KB)

67.8 KB JPG

>>16917875
>put 10 dollars in a savings account
>immerse self in ultracold sodium in a vacuum
>time slows by a factor of over 20 million
>come out after 5 minutes (from your perspective)
>collect trillions of dollars

>>16917901
Yes.