Thread #16918223
File: einstein.png (361.8 KB)
361.8 KB PNG
Why are there no more einsteins?
In the 21st century we have not had any field revolutionized by a new theory or new invention. There are zero iconic scientists in the past two decades. Ongoing projects in any domain keep getting delayed, or take much longer than anticipated. Also IQ has been declining, and school achievement standards have been decreasing. Even though more papers are being published than ever, scientific innovation seems to be slowing. In the first decades of both the 20th and 19th century science and tech moved faster.
Is humanity getting dumber?
51 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16918223
There probably are. But academia is fucked to the point that they were probably just ignored and told to work on some one elses project for 20 years untill they have enough publications to take over some dying boomers lab.
In my experience, no one gets to do shit that is worthwhile in this hellhole that is academia.
>>
>>
>>
>>16918223
Post-modernism. Physics went up its own asshole with nonrealism and nihilism. The official line now is
>don't ask why
>we can't really understand anything
>100 pages of math and the author can't explain the physical meaning
>entire field ends up as performative jargon usage
And also
>universities hacking the funding system
>need to increase headcount
>just bring in a bunch of chinese and indians who can hardly speak english
>who cares if their qualifications are made up
>who cares if their schools back home literally taught them to cheat
>also more blacks and hispanics for diversity
>making science a place where MORE women succeed = oversocialization, emphasis on comformity and semantics
>"yeah sorry is that a diagram? I can't rotate that in my head"
>>16918225
lol This
>>
>>16918223
Our Science is too extensive for any individual to make a significant contribution to. Our Science is too rigorously peer-reviewed for any individual to overturn. The Age of the Maverick is over. Aristotle, Galileo, Newton, Einstein, Schroedinger, all those clowns... all they were ever good for was picking low-hanging fruits. Trivial things like Relativity and QM. Now we're doing Real Science now. Real Science is a collaborative process. It reflects the virtues of the Collective. Individuals can only try to tackle Reality using human insights based on human intuitions and human philosophy. But Reality is inhuman. It's indifferent, cold and meaningless. Reality is beyond human semantics. Deciphering it is a slow and methodical grind that requires many hands. You vill collect ze data. You vill do ze calculations. You vill reason within ze peer-reviewed paradigm. And you vill be a Real Scientist.
>>
>>
File: 1723078689794793.png (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB PNG
>>16918223
We don't need Einstein.
We have something better.
>invents cars
>invents batteries
>invents electric cars
>invents tunneling
>invents trains
>invents online banking
>invents the blockchain
>invents dogecoin
>invents space rockets
>invents robots
>invents A.I.
>invents brain implants
>invents telekinesis
>invents taxis
>invents buses
>invents mass transit
HOW DOES HE DO IT BROS????
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZG4ug0byXk
>>
>>
File: IMG_2753.png (149.7 KB)
149.7 KB PNG
>>16918223
I didn’t go to college
I have no connections
I created an entire new field of physics deeper than quantum physics
I will die in pain and poverty and then my ideas will be glorified but some random yahoo who doesn’t fully understand the field thus complicating it
>>
>>16918223
Einstein got lucky by being the first one to form and articulate special relativity.
Given the experimental results of Lorentz and Michelson-Morely a model of special relativity was bound to be discovered soon. It's actually surprising it took as long as it did - maybe others did have ideas but didn't publish or didn't have the (((connections))) to get published.
>>
File: Circus Master.gif (689.1 KB)
689.1 KB GIF
They all go into finance now to redistribute unbacked FIAT fractional reserve paper slop property instrument packages, or to game some image Learning Language Model A.I. so it can manipulate the gambling slop stock market savings portfolios, or medical to research a drug that allows masonic boomer golems to sacrifice children to Bohemian Grove deities on FBI protected Third Temple islands for a few more decades before they rot back into vampire dust
*Rubs beakers together greedily*
15 paywalls little man
Put those research papers in my hand
If the goy try and learn and ascend they will
Owe me
Owe me
Owe me
>>
File: hesdeadJIM.jpg (143.2 KB)
143.2 KB JPG
Modern science has become a cult of greedy faggots(literally) and if you don't kneel to the literal cash thieving homosexuals who run academia you get black balled. Meanwhile the literal AIDS riddled PhD's in charge make everyone work on nonsense projects like Muh Dark Matter and Muh Dark Energy and other imaginary problems. Super colliders that do nothing, Elon's Spruce Goose Starship to nowhere, Cold Fusion, AGI, Quantum computers, and countless other hamster wheel like wastes of time have captured MULTIPLE generations of smart minds with weak character and put them to work moving sand from one side of the room to the other. This is done ON PURPOSE to retard scientific development for evil means. Furthermore philosophy and independent critical thought is basically forbidden in modern science which is the true fire that drives discovery.
Modern science is filled with midwits who follow orders and free though and imagination has been chased away. So the few people with high IQs and the personalities needed to make real ground breaking discoveries are denied titles, access to labs, and everything else a person might need to succeed. In the rare case someone discovers something ground breaking in a garage despite this they mysteriously die.
You should watch Sabine's long form debates on YouTube on the topic, she talks about this in length. Science is a cult of grifters who serve the devil.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16918223
Roger Penrose exists.
He discovered hawking points and figured out that the big bang theory is wrong and proved it and nobody gives a shit. He won a nobel prize along with stephen hawking for proving geodesic incompleteness which led to the discovery of black holes. But you know, who gives a fuck.
>>
>>16918223
Major breakthroughs are made constantly, they're just in increasingly niche fields that require an increasing amount of foundational knowledge to pursue further. People bitching about
>muh stagnation
can't even be bothered to learn the basics of breakthroughs made a hundred years ago, so of course they're blissfully unaware of (or knowingly ignoring) stuff that's happened within the last decade.
>>
File: 1746949673589629.jpg (110.8 KB)
110.8 KB JPG
I love the Right Brothers!
I love Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos!
Let me go into my garage, at my home, on the land that I own to work on some experiments of my own and contribute to humanity like they did....oh wait...that's right I make less than a European peasant and own no land, and no home, and no garage, and thusly no laboratory and no experiments....no startup money at all...I have nothing but hard labor for near slave wages, not even enough to take care of myself and live, just enough to survive.
It hurts so badly bros.
The laboratory I would have had, the book shelves, the tools... are instead sitting on a private runway for pedophiles, on yachts, mansions for sexual exploitation parties, islands being used to rape and torture children to death for satanic rituals, protected by Federal CIA and FBI Agents...all that money goes to them, their families, their lives, their futures....
Why did the masonic boomer golems choose those vampires over their own sons?
I don't understand why they chose that greed
It fucking hurts my soul so bad I don't want to wake up anymore I just want to sleep forever
I dreamed so hard and had my soul destroyed by your choice
That's my reward for trying to contribute and help in this universe
>>
>>
>>
>>16918223
There are plenty of brilliant people in the world inventing new or more efficient technologies. The problem is that corporations come to own all of their inventions and there's absolutely no incentive to excel because the rich are not interested in competition, not even meritous competition.
>>
File: reddit.png (6.2 KB)
6.2 KB PNG
>There are plenty of brilliant people in the world inventing new or more efficient technologies. The problem is that corporations come to own all of their inventions and there's absolutely no incentive to excel because the rich are not interested in competition, not even meritous competition.
You heard xer. Might as well have the government defund scientific institutions. Especially """climatology""". No point wasting taxpayer money on that shit when the corpos end up owning it all.
>>
>>16918611
He received the equivalent of over half a million dollars in today's inflation as a gift of startup cash from his rich parents...then the government gave him free no bid contracts to install back-doors after he stole the mouse from Xerox...then he shipped all those American jobs that gave his parents a wealth opportunity passed on to him, over to to India, deracinating those same opportunities and chances he had for other white Americans, essentially pulling up the ladder after him and closing that door for future innovators not named Ramjeet or Xinxau
>>
>>
>>
>>16918223
>Why are there no more einsteins?
because you can only rly say who was the most usefull scientist in reteospect, we celebrate einstein and hawking as the biggest minds, because we now know the shit they figured was more important than other shit for the shit we think abt now
the century isn't even 3 decades old, do you think anyone knew einstein while he just figured his shit out?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16918223
Academia was very different back then. By academia I mean universities, publishing journals and more. Nowadays it has a lot of fluff which drowns out any potential Einstein and worse it has bureaucratic roadblocks that prevent such an Einstein from even having a chance.
>>
>>
>>16918946
NPCs like you have no individual essence and keep thinking about "systems". You can't do anything without a "system" telling you what to do and evaluating the results. You can't think without a system telling you how to think. When asked to resolve the supposed issue you're complaining about, you immediately devolve into communist whinging about how the system isn't helping you resolve it.
>>
>>
>>16918223
Low hanging fruit. If you have 100 Einsteins all working on fundamental problems you're gonna be left with all the problems 100 Einsteins couldn't solve, and turns out those left over problems are pretty fucking hard.
>>
>>
>>16918964
>Hurr durr I am dany and will break the wheel
Meanwhile in reality
>Herp derp la herp, I am a jobless cretin with no skills surviving off social welfare. Btw I will speak of anarchy and how it's ideal for me
>>
>>
>>
>>16918223
Einstein struggled hard during his early career. There's a reason why his entry was informal. These channels no longer exist. System rewards assembly linebullshit articles over depth and moments of brilliance. Basically academia has changed from a craft/art into KPI driven corpo job. Science is for normies now
>>
>>16921880
Let's not act like Einstein didn't benefit from the system at the time. He only decided to publish SR paper after Michelson-Morley failed, which he lied about. He also published many papers that benefited from a lack of peer review, some of which were catastrophically wrong like his insistence on gravitational waves being nonphysical. Any opposition he faced was localized to the beginning of his career and mostly because he opposed orthodoxy of that time. A common sentiment in late 19th and very early 20th century was that we've discovered all there is to discover and orthodoxy was almost sacred. People used to straight up ignore or try to silence ideas they disagreed with, even when faced with a mountain of evidence. Nowadays the field isn't nowhere as dogmatic as it used to be and new ideas are welcome. People who go around trying to falsify stuff are treated like saints instead because nobody wants to do it as it's hard to get funding for research that isn't novel or marketable.
The current system isn't perfect but it's far better than what it used to be. You're also ignoring that there are few if any things left you can just MacGyver an experimental setup for in your garage like you could a hundred years ago.
>>
>>
>>
File: 1495255235711.png (490.8 KB)
490.8 KB PNG
>>16918620
He's 100% right. Why are you simping for billionaires and kike-run megacorporations you stupid faggot?
>>
>>
>>16918223
Grand theories require a massive body of work during which you are not making money. Getting grants for very grand but abstract things is almost impossible. It's much easier to make a small but measurable contribution to something useable IRL in 2-3 years so that ((businesspeople)) who only care about the line going up would give you a next grant.