>food printer
Kek implying goys will ever have access to this. You will eat a slurry made out of mosquitoes.

File: il_fullxfull.1480652691_bqox.jpg (54.1 KB)

54.1 KB JPG

>he never ate books in soups

>>16918631
whole foods will always exist for the elites and as such will always remain a status symbol for the goyim to emulate. Plus there are 2.5 trillion reasons for an extra layer to insert itself into the supply chain.

throw a roll of food unprinted onto the barbie. Meh who has time to print it into a shape.

File: tenor-1301260006.gif (242.5 KB)

242.5 KB GIF

>>16918627
Nature literally prints food at a molecular level....it's called "plants and animals". It also does so in an insanely efficient way humans could never hope to match. In what world does it make sense to build a factory out of millions of pounds of concrete and steel and glass to fill with human workers and run a million volts of electricity too....all to "print food". You need to burn something like coal or nuclear material to make the power, all the plastics made with oil, all the gas spent for materials to ship to the factory, all the gas the worker's cars use driving to work every day, and on and on and on. The insane doom loop of resources spirals out of control quickly....all to reproduce what nature does effortlessly and the factory version will always be inferior to the low resource input natural alternative.

>Another term that might be relevant is "Stigler's Law," which states, "Anything that can be done, will be done. And it will be done in the most complicated and expensive way possible." This concept, named after economist George Stigler, highlights how industries or technologies might pursue complex solutions to problems that could be more simply or efficiently addressed through natural or traditional means.

All food on Earth derives it's energy and status from our sun, the fusion power plant in the sky. The entire food cycle starts with plants that convert solar radiation into pure energy and that energy passes down the food chain and feeds all life. With out that genesis an insane amount of power and resources must be brought to bare to match The Sun which is basically impossible. Well....literally impossible. This is bare bones basic logic. If you people weren't as retarded as dirt you'd be able to answer these infantile nonsense questions before embarrassing yourselves by posting like a retard.

>melty out of nowhere
frogtard

>>16918627
lol we're just now understanding the effects of all the slop chemicals that people have been eating for 50 years. I'll skip this

you can grow algae in lab and make products from them like algae butter, algae oil, algae wine, algae stocks, etc.

the whole thing reminds me of Mushishi the anime's take on harvesting the tiny animal like plants for medicinal and food products.

this would be even less popular than what vegans are currently eating, no one can trust it if they can't trust where it comes from or how its made, the propaganda against it would be immense

>>16918627
Real food is far too cheap for any meme food to compete. At best you will get lab grown meat where the meat grows without the rest of the useless animal.

>>16918698
Plants and sun aren't all that efficient actually. It's perfectly possible for a solar panel to make enough power that a LED pointed at a piece of lettuce gets you more lettuce in the end than if you just leave it out in the sun especially when you consider the enhanced growing environment when you grow something in a controlled and pest free warehouse vs outside. This can even make financial sense if you consider transport distance and freshness despite the expensive machinery required, though only with some expensive produce like lettuce and when land price is sufficiently high. The food is till real though not some weird printer stuff which will never be economically viable in a place where soil is readily available (so anywhere on earth space might be a different story).

>>16918627
maybe 5 years max in theoretical terms food printing is epistemically bankrupt in the ideologies that islam wants us to hunt for food right?

>>16918698
>>16918755
>It also does so in an insanely efficient way humans could never hope to match.
Now that all depends on what you're optimizing for. If you only care about making the masses of useless eaters feel full while they await to be culled by engineered wars and engineered diseases, maybe toxic, nutrient-free slop can be produced more efficiently in warehouses with LEDs than cabbages leeching the global oligarchy's nutrients out of the global oligarchy's soil. It may even make economic sense and be good for our GDP, our QOL and our Democracy in the long run.

>>16918838
>>>/pol/

>>16918842
If you don't like /pol/ talk don't start /pol/ threads.

>>16918627
It's called cooking.

>>16918843
How the fuck is my thread /pol/ related, fucking imbecile

>>16918950
>how the fuck is my deformed technocratic fantasy /pol/
gb2p

>>16918960
It takes literally 5 seconds on google scholar to find out it's an actual research topic

>>16918966
It takes literally 5 seconds on google scholar to find out gender-affirming therapy is an actual research topic.

>>16918968
Yes it is, glad we agree

>>16918968
Hey retard, why are you not sperging on this thread >>16918658 ?

>>16918981
I accept your concession that your "research topic" is politicized /pol/trash just like gender-affirming therapy.

>>16918984
Does your psychotically ill and retarded ass think that OP doesn't understand he's posting /pol/trash? Feel free to give him that reminder.

>>16918838
sent that freak flying

>>16918986
I think you're confused; researching about how to perform gender-affirming therapy in a technical sense is science, and the ideology behind it is politics (should we really apply it?). I should not be explaining basic philosophy here.

>>16918996
>researching about how to perform gender-affirming therapy is science
Ok, tranny. You should take your "science" back to /pol/, thoughbeit.

A FDM or other 3d printing process is not the way you would want to produce artificial goop. You would want a continuous reel to reel process.

Food is just glucose ya idiot.
Find a way to get glucose into cells easily without food and you're set.

>>16919984
My tongue wants to feel texture.

there is literally nothing that could compel me to eat printed food

>>16918627
not to rain on your parade, but in order to print food you need food as ink. at that point, why not just eat the ink?

>>16918627
Why print? When you take it mass production its just gonna be molded, or a "gelatin" that you squeeze out of a plastic bag onto your stove at home

>>16918968
>gender-affirming therapy
So conversation therapy. Wasn't that banned a long time ago or debunked or something? Imagine growing up being affirmed in being LGBT. I have a baby now and easily could've fallen into that trap. People need validation and if orgy parades make them feel comfortable then I say let them. I encourage them to fall off the tree of life, if only so that humanity can be rid of their sickness

>>16918627
Will it destroys the agriculture industry like what AI is doing to computing?

Food printing would reduce the price of meat, give you meat thats more healthy, and there would not be animal suffering.