Thread #16919066
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
File: IMG_7986.jpg (76.2 KB)
76.2 KB
76.2 KB JPG
I thought I knew what physics was about and it was particles and forces and fields and galaxies and crap, but apparently none of that and it’s actually tensors and spinors and gauge groups and fiber bundles and crap. I’ve been trying to learn quantum theory and relativity from Curt Jaimungal’s podcast, but I went in expecting familiar “physics” language. Wtf is all the math jargon, what do I need to learn, what even field of math are they using? I only went up to Algebra 1 in high school, I went into accounting after so didn’t think I needed any math beyond that.
+Showing all 15 replies.
>>
>>16919066
>I’ve been trying to learn quantum theory and relativity from Curt Jaimungal’s podcast
Why would you do that?
Just read a book nigger
>>
>>16919161
>read a book
this is probably some sort of epicenter of the problem.
>>
>>16919161
Conversations are entertaining and books generally are not
>>
Beside the point anyhow. I wouldn’t know which book to buy. I don’t know what genre of math I’m supposed to be learning in order to understand this stuff, and I don’t want to waste time learning math I don’t need to know to get the jist
>>
>>16919166
>I don’t know what genre of math
Analysis, Linear Algebra, Complex Analysis, Differential Geometry, Functional Analysis.
Then you can start with physics. Analytical Mechanics, Electro Dynamics, Special Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory.
>I don’t want to waste time learning math I don’t need to know to get the jist
Don't waste your time learning qft then. And don't waste your time listening to grifters like Curt.
>>
>>16919172
The other 4 are easy but DG is hard as shit for me.
>>
>>16919176
NOT OP btw, but I just wanted to comment. I can barely figure out what a connection or metric tensor is for some reason even though I know the other 4/5 like the back of my hand.
>>
>>16919176
Not only is it difficult, the notation requires a different kind of intuition from the previous topics, and conventions feel like they change from author to author.
>>
>>16919172
I’m happy to learn the “relevant” math and thanks for the list. I meant I don’t want to waste time on some area of math that I don’t need to study to get to that specific genre of math. There are lots of intermediate and tangential paths to math that I think can probably be skipped.
>>
>>16919165
>books generally are not
ngmi and that's a good thing no pseuds allowed
>>
>>16919165
Go read the originals then instead of the solidified version of it that's presented as pure formalism. Like go read Hamilton or something. It's more entertaining.
>>
>>16919165
>Conversations are entertaining and books generally are not
And you want to do physics? You realize there are few people in that field you will be able to meet and have 'conversations' with in your state right?
>>
>>16919161
Gen Z can't read.
>>
>>16919066
Funny pic
>>
>>16919066
>I went into accounting after so didn’t think I needed any math beyond that.
10/10

Reply to Thread #16919066


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)