>>16920376
You are free to do that if you like. You see any telescope cops around?

>>16920378
I will kick your smart balls up to the roof of your smart mouth.

>>16920376
Planck is stopping us.

>>16920376
First of all, the light has to get to this mirror surface from earth to produce a reflection. If we looked at a mirror from 20,000 light years away, we would be seeing 40,000 years into the past. Not to mention, we have to acount for the earth's position change, which with the spherical shape of the mirror would result in it being off-centered and therefore skewed. Is this even worth it?

>>16920504
>is this worth it?
Maybe..
>>16920495
I don’t know who that is.

>>16920376
Neutron stars can rotate extremely quickly. Could there be a neutron star that rotates so quickly, that the surface gravity at the equator could be equal to 1G? And if this neutron star had cooled down to Earth temperatures, could you conceivably stand on the surface at the right spot?

>>16920762
planck is a little goblin who lives inside subatomic particles and holds them together, but his arms can't get any shorter so we call that length a planck length

>>16920949
A neutron star would have at least around 1 solar mass. So no.. you would get crushed by the gravity. 1 teaspoon of a neutron star’s material would weigh several tons on earth.

>>16920967
I thought a teaspoon of neutrons masses as much as a mountain

>>16920949
I dont think so, the surface of a regular neutron star allready reaches relativistic speeds

But still interessting to think about how it would feel to stand on an object rotating that fast

>>16920967
Nigga, I said you stand at the spot where rotation cancels out surface gravity enough to where you would only experience 1 g of downard pull.

>>16921153
You become spagetti too. At that speed the g force between your head and your foot are very differerent.

Also coriolis force would be insame

>>16921162
What if I lay down and start masturbating

>>16921302
your dick would get spaghettified