>>734128454
>3 days before release
>25 critic scores
yup, the reviews are bought
better wait for trustworthy reviewers to share their opinions post-launch

>>734128543
anon, all of the people reviewing this are likely trans. of course they gave it a good score. there is no such thing as trustworthy game reviewers.

>>734128543
All early reviews are bought, they literally give the game for free for a bunch of "reviewers".
Also, this is something new, besides being a Pokemon game, they need reviews to convince people to buy.
The only way to really see if a game is good is word of mouth/ legs.

I am waiting for the hype of RERequiem to die a bit and see if it's actually worth it.

>>734128454
All Nintendo games are at least okay because they focus on gameplay first and foremost. I bet you pokopia doesn’t even have a “plot” or “character development”

Pokemon had a rough transition into 3D

Remember, this is POKEMON slapped on a game key card. There's 2 outcomes here. They're testing the waters.

>Oh shit, game key cards sell when we put our big name IPs on it!
or
>Oh shit, digital sales are the way to go now! Let's be digital-only next generation!

>>734128895
word of legs?

>>734130975
yeah, if fatasses would walk to gamestop to pick it up, it must be worth it

>>734128454
this is what happens when you hand the pokemon IP to a company that isn't gamefreak

>caring about metacritic

>>734128454
It's just Pokemanchildren + nintendo bonus. The game is a 70 at best on a relative scale.

File: file.png (15.1 KB)

15.1 KB PNG

>>734128454
it's not

here's proof, it dropped 1 point

>>734131456
The score has fallen...

>>734128454
>10/10
>review by: NINTENDO GAMING MONTHLY

>>734131497
Millions must faint

>DQB but pokemon
it's probably a fine $40 game

>>734132018
DQB kicked ass, fuck you.

>>734132018
DQB2 has been on sale for $20, so it's funny to see people willingly pay $70 for that but with Pikachu instead. The MSRP for DQB2 was even $50, Pokefags can't help but be scalped every step of the way.

>>734132087
I didn't say it was bad
Just that I'm not paying 70 bucks for a pokemon reskin.

>>734132153
Wtf is DQB and can emus run the new Pokémon?

>>734132383
Dragon Quest Builders and No.

>>734128454
this game has no physical release right? kinda funny that the highest scoring pokemon game of all time is full price digital only

>>734132276
>>734132153
It's Builders 3, not a Builders reskin. I'd rather it was DQ themed, but B3 is worth that price tag if they actually made the social sim part better. That was one of the big issues with B1 and B2; partway in you stop giving a shit about villagers and the checklist gets tedious.

>>734132987
They removed the combat, it's not really DQB3. Koei Tecmo does this a lot with their licensed games, the closest example would be all the Dynasty Warriors lite games that had mechanics that were different than traditional DW. This is basically like comparing Fate Samurai Remnant or Persona 5 Strikes to the Hyrule Warriors games, it's the same team but the different IPs played much differently even though they were all musous.

>>734128543
Wouldn't all the reviews be 10/10s if they were bought?

>>734128454
It's a pokemon game... There isn't a single pokemon game ever released that's better than 6/10.

>>734128543
Cry some more disgusting snoy

>>734128614
Projecting much? You will never be a woman, troon.

>>734133387
pokemon snap for n64 was a 12/10

why the hell is this minecraft ass game not on switch 1?

>Dragon Quest Builders meets Viva Pinata
First game in some time I've been excited for

>>734134597
god viva pinata was such a good game

>>734128454
when can we expect a NSP leak?

>>734133254
The combat was pretty bad desu. I don't mind that so much. It was the objective based Minecrafting that made it fun. I can't say for certain if it's actually better, but I wouldn't be so uncharitable to it.

>>734133326
No, they give them some leeway else it's too obvious. 9/10.

File: 1769002074262454.jpg (89.2 KB)

89.2 KB JPG

I love DQB and always want more of it, so I'm hopeful but I have no Switch 2 and won't buy one for it. A shame this will never come to PC due to the Pokemon license.

>>734128454
this is Nintendo's Switch 2 system seller for the entire year, they're paying billions for the reviews

>>734131456
STOP THE COUNT

Seems kino, will pick it up Thursday.
Love DQ Builders (1 more so than 2)
Love Viva Pinata
And Pokemon is ok

Pokechads just keep on winning. Gen 10 will be 11/10

File: hq720.jpg (18.6 KB)

18.6 KB JPG

>>734138973
>A shame this will never come to PC due to the Pokemon license.
trust the plan

File: images-17.jpg (74.4 KB)

74.4 KB JPG

I had zero interest in this until I learned it was DQB3. I will now play your game.

>>734140824
same

>>734128454
I hope it gets nominated and wins GOTY at TGAs, that'd be hilarious even though it'll never happen.

>>734131456
>o no you got another 4/5

>>734130210
No one will reply to your post because both outcomes show Nintendo in bad light. Until today, they could cope about game key cards, but now there is no excuse.

>>734131456
It's over...

>>734134597
what about this is similar to viva pinata? i thought it was le comfy stardew valley clone?

>>734131258
Anon, Pokopia was Game Freak's idea and they're co-developers. Ohmori was the one behind the whole thing.

>>734131351
Have you been in a coma for the last decade? Pokémon games have been getting reviewbombed for years.

>>734141793
if gamefreak knew how to make a good game they would have made one sometime in the last few decades

>>734140824
It is dqb without the combat. I'll wait for a sale.

Higher Metacritic than Resident Evil.
The weak should fear the strong.

>>734141416
Instead of capturing pokemon with pokemons, you attract them to your island instead. The mechanic is basically the same as Viva Pinata where you need to build specific habitats for them to come and then they join your island

File: 1772473451194462.jpg (334.2 KB)

334.2 KB JPG

>>734142210
>critic score
I'll wait for the userscore

>>734142608
the fuck why did critics hate mystery dungeon?

>>734142690
they probably got filtered by the gameplay

>>734142109
>combat
You do you but dqb2 was literally just swinging a sword. There was no bow, no magic, no anything. Just a simple sword swing.

>>734128454
It's not made by gamefreak. Also early reviews tend to be more positive because they're by people who are fans of everything pokemon.

>>734142608
>I'll wait for the userscore
>THIS GAME IS INCREDIBLE 10/10 life affirming, life changing, thank you sooooooooooo much (0.8hrs on record)
ive had it up to here with user reviews

>>734143214
You kind of just realize everyone is retarded and it's up to you to find worth in something.

no way

>>734143309
Damn you're telling me to form my own opinions and shit? that's crazy

>>734137681
Even if you didn't like the combat, it's still part of DQB's identity and without it you can't call it DQB3

>>734142036
Because they were making more money by spending less. Why would you want to change the formula?

>>734142730
Is mystery dungeon kino?

>>734128454
/v/, 2009
>Journalist opinions don't matter
/v/, 2026
>OH MY GOD LOOK AT WHAT THIS JOURNALIST THINKS ABOUT GAME

>>734143524
yeah its great although I dont know what to recommend as an introduction since I havent played them in forever they also dont really make new ones anymore. Does anyone know if the remakes are good?

File: pikachu-pepe-funny.gif (64.2 KB)

64.2 KB GIF

>>734143738
Idk. I havent touched Pokémon since Dexit.

>>734143527
You weren't even here for the Zelda 8.8 saga? Go back to Minecraft kiddo.

>>734143498
to make a good game instead of shitty ones

I'm excited. I've always liked the world of pokemon but there hasn't been a good game since Shuffle

>>734142608
>I'll wait for the review bombing
You're buck broken.

>>734143738
The switch one is fine. People only complained about friend areas turning into a menu when before was an empty box you had to walk to talk to a npc and open an menu...

>>734130210
Or GF are just cheap ass retards.

File: 1766185643418324.png (49.4 KB)

49.4 KB PNG

>>734131456

>>734146302
>or
That's scenario 2, though.

>>734143524
Eh unless you really care about the pokemon branding they aren't as good as the other mystery dungeon/shiren the wanderer/etc games
Not being able to evolve your party until postgame is stupid

/v/ raped and gaped by the bing bing tablet again

absolute Pokemon redemption arc

>>734130112
How so? Stadium games were pretty great

>>734143527
No one actually cares about review scores or steam charts other than for shitposting purposes in 1 direction or the other. If Pokopia got a 78 you'd have the "OH NO NO TENDIEBROS WHAT HAPPENED?" posts instead but it got an 89 so now it's "OH NO NO SNOYBROS ARE YOU OKAY?! HAHAHAHAH"

>>734137665
Hahahahahaha oh you...

>>734147293
what happens if a WiWa gets 99?

>>734147357
A shitposting tsunami that engulfs the entire board, most threads would be about it like during Smash reveals. Even 5 years later there'd still be people posting the metacritic for it in different threads.