Thread #734134764
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
File: classes.jpg (73.4 KB)
73.4 KB
73.4 KB JPG
These are grat and all but where's the option to play as a regular person?
+Showing all 34 replies.
>>
Make an unarmed fighter and stay at level 1
>>
>>734134764
That would be fighter

Or go play tabletop and you can really be whatever you want
>>
>>734134764
huh? you clearly have fighter for a normal person and rogue for a nigger person if you feel exotic
>>
>>734134764
A regular person is basically a level 0 fighter
>>
>>734134764
In DND, average joes are Commoners. They're little better than chaff.
>>
>>734134764
Ranking from least to most regular
>Sorcerer
>Warlock
>Wizard
>Cleric
>Druid
>Paladin
>Barbarian
>Bard
>Ranger
>Monk
>Rogue
>Fighter
>>
>>734134764
A regular person is not an adventurer. Go play a regular person simulator instead of a d&d game.
>>
>>734136349
Wizards are just nerds, how is that more special than shape shifting animals fuckers?
>>
>>734134764
Pretty sure most people would agree on most "normal people" being barbarians today
>>
>>734136349
>Monk
>regular
Monks are physical Wizards, bro. They just spend their years learning how to use body magic (ki) instead of magic magic (magic).
>>
>>734134764
Go get a job.
>>
>>734134764
nu-dnd high fantasy nonsense means that level 1 adventurers are no longer regular people with some vague affinity, but they're all skilled magical fighters who can learn dozens of spells most of which they literally can cast for free for some reason
>>
>>734134764
Fighter is classically just some random peasant with a sword and shield
>>
File: Yartar.jpg (643.6 KB)
643.6 KB
643.6 KB JPG
>>734136362
But the opening cinematic is the nautiloid literally capturing regular people in Yartar
>>
>>734139748
And?
>>
>>734139590
>level 1 adventurers are no longer regular people with some vague affinity
>>734139728
>Fighter is classically just some random peasant

This was never a thing.
>>
>>734136362
IS there an RPG about playing as a peasant commoner?
>>
>>734134764
>no artificer
>no blood hunter

whelp
>>
>>734140018
Harvest moon
>>
>>734134764
>Sorcerer
>Wizard
>Warlock
ok what's even the difference between these three
>>
>>734140018
you could make an, on purpose weak player in dark souls
>>
>>734140147
sorcerer has its power come from a higher plane of existence source and/or ancestry.

wizard is a scholar who studied a lot and studies a lot to learn magic

warlock makes a contract with an amoral/evil being for power
>>
>>734140018
Well how does a peasant commoner play exactly? You can simply have a peasant commoner background as any d&d class. Also you can just be a nobody commoner in Mount and Blade. Or in Kenshi. Even Gothic 1 starts you off as a no-skill nobody, might as well pretend you were a peasant.
But either way you gain combat skills along your journey, so I don't think that background even matters beyond early game flavour.
>>
>>734139960
yes, a level 1 bard is literally just a dude who can play music, a level 1 wizard knows one "cantrip" spell he can cast once per day (like light), fighters were the only class able to wield swords (only shortswords maybe a shield at level 1), initially there literally was only 2 classes and magic-users
>>
>>734140147
Sorcerers are from an unusual ancestry and control innate magic through force of personality, wizards study an art and a science that utilizes specific mental and spiritual technologies to direct magic, warlocks practice pharmakeia and make pacts with extraplanar beings to acquire magical gifts and services. Saying they're all the same is like saying a chef is the same as an engineer.
>>
>>734140219
>amoral/evil being
Warlocks can make pacts with good patrons, too. You could make a deal with a unicorn or a djinni or anything else sufficiently powerful enough.
>>
>>734140638
what happens if you vastly outlevel your patron? can a unicorn grant you level 9 spell slots?
>>
>>734140481
wizard are magic-users, warlocks are edgy magic-users, sorcerers are cheating magic-users
>>
>>734140481
>Saying they're all the same is like saying a chef is the same as an engineer.
Good post, I think a cook and a baker would make a better comparison. They seem the same when it comes to the end result, but the way they get there is very different.
>>
>>734140793
Just pretend its a really special unicorn
>>
>>734140381
This post sounds like "you can make any game hard blindfolded". Well of course, I think he was asking about a game focused about the peasant experience in particular.
>>
>>734140381
It would literally be a medieval-farm chore simulator
>>
>why yes it is me, john backstory, humble level 1 sorcerer, and descendant of a red dragon or something, which is why I can beathe fire out of my ass
they took us for absolute fool
>>
>>734139748
They also captured powerful people. Every party member who was wormed used to be a lot better at what they do than they are at the start of the game.

Reply to Thread #734134764


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)