Thread #3937388
File: images(53).jpg (21.8 KB)
21.8 KB JPG
>hear nothing but negative things about this game and how hard it is.
>it's a solid 3/5 jrpg just like the two 3ds games.
>the difficulty is on par with your average ps2 rpg
Pretty decent game overall I'm glad I didn't listen to the haters and skip this.
7 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>3937388
>negative things about this game and how hard it is.
That's a weird way to say that the game is full of obviously overpowered choices that break it wide open
Such as: "making literally anyone on your team a Beast Master or Shieldbearer at any point" and the few ways the game has to throw wrenches at the player are entirely unpredictable and don't make sense for the enemy that does them, like the Oracle asterisks dropping 4 Bomb Arm consumables on your team in one round.
And when they get blindsided, the player just goes back to the obviously unbalanced stuff like the aforementioned Shieldbearer instead of messing around with more novel set ups they find interesting.
Your level of straw manning and misrepresentation of the complains about the game and it's systems is making you sound like a FF8 defender right now.
>>
>>
>>
>>3937480
Making the risky choice to be conventional. In game it means sticking to your first plan even though it seems illogical and references the gameplay system where you store turns by defending (called defaulting) as brave points which you can spend to take multiple turns at once.
Meta it means square was taking a risk and making a standard snes style jrpg, albeit a very meta one.
>>
>>