File: madhvacarya.jpg (394 KB)

394 KB JPG

>>41996652
Doesnt afraid of anything, but I prefer the synthesis schools like visishtadvaita.

File: FUDlsy9UcAAF6sx.jpg (181 KB)

181 KB JPG

for me, it's bhakti vedanta

>>41996652

> Advaita Vedanta
is the real moksha ( or salvation for christian or christ consioussness seen from outside ).

Stay in that state until you die physicaly.

>>41996652
i don't trust any spiritual "insight" coming from brown people

>>41996652
stay away from vagina dentata

>>41997597
Advaita is just a whiny appeal to Buddhists that the Vedas are totally legit and you can have your void but this time is pure white instead of pure black.

Dvaita MUST be true, or else Advaita is false.

>>41999468
>>41999463
>>41999456
>>41999399
>>4199939
DUALISTS GET BTFO

File: All_Domain_Control.jpg (368 KB)

368 KB JPG

If your religion isn't intercosmic don't talk.

File: Isvara's_Feats_Unbeatable.jpg (82.9 KB)

82.9 KB JPG

Octagram = Canonical Hindu Symbol

>just ask for thoughts on dvaita
>advaitin goes crazy and floods the thread
Like a Christian, they are scared of people asking questions.

>>41996652
junk

>>41999113
buddhism is a retarded religion to pacify slaves

File: i-i.png (502 KB)

502 KB PNG

Basically, there's savikalpa, nirvikalpa and sahaja samadhi. Savikalpa and nirvikalpa are temporary. Sahaja is more or less nirvikalpa without return or interruption. In savikalpa there is still a trace of the knower-knowing-known (and thus duality) while that triad is non-existent in nirvikalpa. The mind in savikalpa may be extremely purified and one-pointed but there is still a witness experiencing something. One in nirvikalpa finds that actions and words occur spontaneously without effort, so if he tells you it's dual or non-dual - that's Brahman expressing the inexpressible through limitation. What tends to happen though is someone temporarily experiences one of these states then his vasanas pull him back out and reform as the ego. Then he is again speaking from ignorance rather than truth.

But it also depends on tradition because some treat samadhi as though you're stuck sitting there absorbed in meditation. One in nirvikalpa samadhi isn't stuck inactive in a seat, you'll still see their bodies behaving like normal. In some cases the dvaita and advaita vedantins may be describing the same thing. It's best not to get too caught up in the philosophy but to know it directly without mediation because ultimately they're describing something beyond the mind using the limited mind.

>>41996692
Hol up, you posted Madhvacarya the staunchest dualist. Didnt you mean Vishnuswami?

>>42000652
No. Thread asked what I thought of Dvaita Vedanta, so I posted Madhva.

The most enlightened being is the stone.
The pebble has no thoughts, no desires, does not consume food, does not experience pain or pleasure.

>>41996652
Gay as fuck.

File: deepak_sarma.jpg (75.6 KB)

75.6 KB JPG

>>42003995
I am a fool. I misread your words and thought you were asking about Advaita Vedanta. Dvaita is absolutely based.

My sincere apologies, anon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IK01a94dRPQ

File: real_vedanta.jpg (183.7 KB)

183.7 KB JPG

>>41996692
It's a myth that Viśiṣṭādvaita is a synthesis school. It predates Tattvavāda and was the first push-back against the evils of Advaita Vedānta.

>>41999343
The eye can only see itself in a reflection. A finger cannot touch its own tip and a sword cannot cut itself. Advaita Vedānta is silliness for overly emotional people, who flee from their own personhood

File: bolton.jpg (521 KB)

521 KB JPG

Check out Robert Bolton's The One and the Many: A Defense of Theistic Religion. Absolutely life-changing book.

>>42004008
Timing is irrelevant. Visishta is a synthesis school because of the philosophy, not because of some attempt to merge different philosophies.

>>42004254
Viśiṣṭādvaita is often mischaracterized as a "middle ground" between Advaita and Dvaita, but that framing collapses the actual logic of the system.

The “Advaita–Viśiṣṭādvaita–Dvaita” spectrum is a modern textbook simplification.

Rāmānuja’s interpretive method is built on the Mīmāṃsā hermeneutic tradition, the Śrī Vaiṣṇava āgamas, and a specific reading of the Upaniṣads that emphasizes samanvaya (coherent integration).

He is arguing that Advaita misreads the śruti and that his own reading is the correct Vedic one.

Viśiṣṭādvaita's concept of “difference” is unique.
Dvaita says difference is absolute. Advaita says difference is ultimately unreal.

Viśiṣṭādvaita says: difference is real, but it is dependent difference—the difference of a mode or attribute from its substance.

This is a third category that neither Advaita nor Dvaita uses. It’s not a midpoint; it’s a different ontology.

Viśiṣṭādvaita rejects the core premises of the other two systems. A synthesis would preserve the essential claims of both. Viśiṣṭādvaita does the opposite.

It rejects Advaita’s idea that the world and individual selves are ultimately unreal or illusory. It rejects Dvaita’s idea that the difference between God, souls, and matter is absolute and unbridgeable.

Instead, it asserts a body–soul relationship between the universe and Brahman. This is not found in either Advaita or Dvaita.

>>42004825
>It’s not a midpoint; it’s a different ontology.
Agreed.
If "synthesis" bothers you semantically, then fine.
You may continue to argue if you want to be so mad.
I shall continue to explain and follow and advance.

https://youtu.be/_WsPZC1-TLo

>>42004910
Viśiṣṭādvaita is amazing. I just don't like when people misrepresent it.

SHOW BOBS AND VAGANA I LOVE YOU

my favourite advaita text is the Ashtavakra Gita
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXmZ8BORhx4
listen to it while abiding as the Self

File: Kedarnath.jpg (23.2 KB)

23.2 KB JPG

>>42002053
Ok then. My bad

>>42004999
It is truly unfortunate that such inspiration can ojnly come about from antagonism and ego.
What single word would you use to describe the three schools of vedanta, since this can so easily disturb your peace?

>>41996652
Looks weird and gay

And the silence is why you and I both know "synthesis" is the best word to communicate.

>>42004039
How did this change your life

>>42009463
It's one of the most validating books I've ever read.

>>42006164
Anger is neutral. In real Vedanta, there's a real, transcendent ego from which purified anger flows. An ego which is completely separate from the constructions of the "I maker" principle. There's a real self behind the false one. There's an anger that leads not to degradation but to liberation.

I wouldn't describe multiple schools with one word. And there are more than three schools of Vedanta, including real synthesis schools, that bring together the best of what came before them.

I appreciate your performative sadhu schtick.

>>42009896
https://annas-archive.li/md5/bd70f835dade69ca48fac39a419fdb4d

Gay brown shiteating bullshit.

File: types_of_vedanta.jpg (116.8 KB)

116.8 KB JPG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkfgb5M9Z-I

>>41996652
Saar kindly get the fuck off my website with your demonic shit eating faggot entities.

>>42004039
https://www.themathesontrust.org/papers/comparativereligion/sw17_bolton-upton.pdf

File: 1756568950165.jpg (1015.3 KB)

1015.3 KB JPG

>>42010024
>>42010063
>ooga booga i am better than indians.

stop spamming like a negro then

Indians aren't Blue!

>>42009797
What did it validate? Your preexisting beliefs?

>>42010639
Experience.

>>42009820
>Anger is neutral.
You werent angry, and I didnt say anger. The mark of a bruised and defensive ego.
>including real synthesis schools
Ahh.
Again - you agree with me.
I appreciate you as weell.
I just wish your glorification of Vedanta didnt require you to be poked in the eye.
But Krishna makes all types.

>>42009797
How did VALIDATION make your life CHANGE??
Are you just saying words?
Why would you change anything in your life if the book was so validating?

>>42011008
There were real synthesis schools after Madhva, but not before. You speak with a forked tongue and in a way that’s more about appearance than substance.

>>42011020
First, you experience something very profound, but you lack the words to express it. Afterwards, you begin to be able to talk about it. That's huge.

>>42011043
Time is irrelevant. The philosophies are eternal, do you not see that?
You still want to attack and insult more than glorify.

>>42011059
Profundity is not necessarily validating nor changing.
So the "life changing" was just your lexicon increased?
The "validation" was....what?

>>42011066
Rāmānuja set the stage for Madhvāchārya. He began to break the spell that Śaṅkarācārya had cast over people's hearts and minds. This is extremely valuable. Madhvāchārya further built on the foundational work that Rāmānuja started.

>>42011073
The validation was in seeing someone clearly demolish the monistic conception of God, and many of the clichés that go with it.

>>42011093
So you really cant? That makes me feel sad, but it explains a lot.

>>42011101
>it refutes monism
THERE ya go. I swear it's like pulling teeth with you people.
Why did it take an hour or so and multiple posts to get you to give such a simple answer?

>>42011115
The philosophies appear within time in a particular sequence for a reason.

>>42011120
Because this is a Dvaita thread, because of the book title, and because the table of contents in the picrel makes it clear and obvious what the book is doing. But I don't mind spoon feeding you.

>>42011135
Not for any reason within the philosophy. That is a material concession.

>>42011145
>Because this is a Dvaita thread
You're blaming the thread for why it took multiple posts for you to figure out what you meant? lol
>But I don't mind spoon feeding you.
CLEARLY you do, since it was so hard for you.

>>42011149
Precisely for reasons found within all three school of thought. They demonstrate a gradual reawakening and healing.

>>42011154
I assumed you understood the obvious. But I'm okay with making it explicit for you.

>>42011164
>all three
More than three.
>They demonstrate a gradual reawakening and healing.
That's what I said. It is a material concession.
You just really want to be contentious, dont you?

why is it so crooked

>>42011172
Dude, anon asked you about the book you said it was life changing.
They asked for a specific example you said it was validating - an opposing reaction.
I noticed and pointed out the contradiction and you said it was profound.
You didnt know what the fuck you were saying, and it took embarrassment for you to finally get your thoughts together.
You're fun. I like getting you upset.

>>41996701
If you are not literally Indian, how can you post this meme without shame?

>>42011180
Sure, more than three. But those three are a part of the process. The salvation of humanity is not a material thing. But the materially-conditioned mind sometimes cannot take a huge leap from one paradigm to another and has to be given one or more transitional forms.

>>42011186
Don't be embarrassed that you missed the obvious.

>>42011193
>But those three are a part of the process.
And the others not those three are nothing?
and only one process? You think everyone has to go through each philosophy?
And you said not just one word, now you can lump it all under a single process?
>The salvation of humanity is not a material thing.
You think you are human? And need saving?
Or are you saying the material condition of "human" can be removed and is somehow existing against Krishna's Will?
>But the materially-conditioned mind sometimes cannot take a huge leap from one paradigm to another and has to be given one or more transitional forms.
....so a concession?
You are saying it's a material concession?
Do you literally bleed if you agree with me?

>>42011197
Lol, just take a loss.
>it was life changing!
>what changed
>nothing, everything was validated!
>what was validated?
>the profundity!!!!
lol

>>42011203
I personally think that the later schools are more sophisticated and profound than what Madhvācārya and Rāmānuja presented. But what those two giants did is so huge that I don't want to make it seem like I'm casting shade. Everything from Rāmānuja onwards is sufficient for salvation and is true in ways that Advaita just isn't. The differences, though meaningful, are more a question of love, relationship, and angle of vision.

>>42011213
It's a fantastic book. I highly recommend it to you and any thoughtful person.

>>42011228
Some glorification.
>>42011229
And some humility.
Truly you do so much better when you arent mad and lashing out.
I really wish you could inspire yourself to do such, instead of needing to be goaded.
But that IS why He sometimes holds the goad.

>>42011234
You’re striking a pose instead of being genuine.

File: Krishna Vitthal.jpg (80.5 KB)

80.5 KB JPG

>>42011244
And I always will, now that I see what it takes to get your proper reactions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I4Y6J8WALM

https://www.tatvavada.org/eng/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NApjLGuAJgQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qIcChOWtjA

>>41996701
for me, its tikka masala

And to think, all this because I had to draw out the fact that visishtadvaita is a synthesis school, as described here:
> those three are a part of the process.
>has to be given one or more transitional forms.

File: udupi.jpg (281.8 KB)

281.8 KB JPG

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-U5JogyM24Q
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kWZzQR948_0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKkChZgWYIw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGACSK3Jwb8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewk7FV35I6s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpf2S4Km9AQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rggVBlvvUMk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-uHOzoeYDo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpNrCdPitXA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIsH1zFUhPs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLpNacBdRho

File: animated_movie.jpg (134.8 KB)

134.8 KB JPG

>>42013323
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XqOE33VQUU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZL6_RTuPFM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2aJJPanXYghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2aJJPanXYg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0PDsamFmLk

It's quite hilarious that the only person who appreciated this thread, OP hates with an extreme passion because OP had to admit they were right several times.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kZpCzCSK0bI

File: dvaitin_and_vishishtadvaitin_chat.jpg (109 KB)

109 KB JPG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69GBinnghUs

My sincere thanks to whoever started this thread.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-D9JyNXSDA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-hHO90u6_s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-eHIab3SjY

File: 1751884818937834.png (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB PNG

>>41996652
They're building Babylon and interpret Satan as a savior, part of the order out of chaos faction that is actually aiding jesuits in combining all the world religions under the Catholics, notice how Biden fucks everything up intentionally day one? Like he's trying to crash the economy? Then Trump undoes SOME of it, including things that don't actually systemically matter.
Yeah they leapfrog each other and play good cop bad cop, but they're still moving society toward an authoritarian cult government that worships Satan blatantly in the end.
It will fail, because the antichrist (doing the same order out of chaos shit) will absorb their system and destroy anyone who resists, appearing to be the good guy.
The mystery religion is only helping Judaism until it builds the temple, the moment the kikes realize their messiah isn't the messiah and that they killed Christ 2,000 years ago is when shit gets nightmare bad. God's wrath immediately comes down after the antichrist desecrates the judaistic temple. Because the world is openly worshipping Satan and that's the final straw for God.
The mystery religion shit is just all world religions combined into one, this is spiritual adultery, and it's warned about with the letter to the church of thyratira, god threatens the people who haven't accepted the gospel within that church with going into the tribulation, because the paganistic traditions of men crept in with the judaizers that try to get you to follow the law to be saved, when no one can.
The cabal will most likely sell the lie that aliens took everyone in the rapture, and that's how they'll finalize their government before the antichrist takes the stage at the UN. The recent "drone" shit is a prep psyop for this, and it's the mother of all psyops that's been running for at least 100 years, since war of the worlds was first broadcast.
Believe the gospel, it's just accepting it as fact, that's how you go to heaven

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XvvI_Z0LgN0
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/8yQqAqw_YXY

>>42022775
I love the picrel. An eye can only see itself reflected in something else. A sword cannot cut itself and a finger cannot touch its own tip.

>>42023100
The base knuckle of a finger cam touch the tip.
Perhaps you are inflexible.
And a whip sword can cut itself.

>>41996652
shitty aislop image cant even put the ankles properly up on top of the thighs

>>41996652
scam

>>41999113
>Advaita is just a whiny appeal to Buddhists
No? Im not even an advaita vadin but from its very conception advaita sought to uproot the buddhist religion from bharata. Didnt you know they were fiercelly against eachother? Never ever heard of Kumarila Bhatta and his camapign against buddhists? And the buddhists werent exactly pacifists either. Fucking threw him off a cliff but he survived

>>42024653
>from its very conception advaita sought to uproot the buddhist religion from bharata
Yes. By re-establisahing the validity of the Vedas.
This was all done by essentially re-packaging Buddhist monism as being taught by the Vedas.

File: 1668471694479396.webm (1.9 MB)

1.9 MB WEBM

>>41996701
>bhakti
Yeah, adoration is where it's at. I created my own sort of tantric rituals for this and had great success. Don't forget to mix in a bit of dyana yoga and karma yoga (selfless service) for good measure.

>>42025506
I'm ignorant of advaita but practice Buddhism. What's the Buddhist monism that made its way into later Hinduism? You're saying there's an outflow from Buddhism to advaita vedanta? Could you please educate me on this, I am willing to learn. Also if there's anything other than "monism," which I do not recognize thus far, I'd like to know. All I know of Hinduism is the Bhagavad-Gita, and its Krishna-Brahman monism is very precious to me (i.e. monotheism)

File: Brhad Aranyaka Upanishad.png (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB PNG

>>42025506
>re packaging buddhist monism as
*Sigh*
Nigga that would be like saying, Christ re packaged pharisean leaven to...
What are you aiming at? To prove some sort of buddhist supremacy? Same buddhism that was originally a subvertion of veda? Im familiar with the teachings of the upanishad. But buddhist idea is not monism. At least not theistically. Its empty ism

>>42025771
Isn't it safest to say Buddha is an Avatar of Vishnu? Why make disputations? Call it emptiness if you like.

>>42025759
>What's the Buddhist monism that made its way into later Hinduism?
Advaita. That's what Advaita means. Not two. One. Monism.
>You're saying there's an outflow from Buddhism to advaita vedanta?
I'm saying the region had mostly rejected the validity of the Vedas, and Adi brought them back by appealing to the current understanding.
>Also if there's anything other than "monism," which I do not recognize thus far, I'd like to know.
You mean like the whole thread?
>>42025771
>Christ re packaged pharisean leaven
Sort of, but He didnt have the extra steps. the whole "I came not to break law but fulfill it." The pharisee had "taken control" of God's word and corrupted it to their own exploitation. As the brahmins had done with the Vedas.
Jesus broke their control, and re-established understanding in one swoop.
In India, the path had more steps. The process you mentioned before, though you keep desperately wanting to disagree with me.
>At least not theistically. Its empty ism
Agreed.
And Advaita went "no no, not a big empty blackness, but a big full whiteness."
>What are you aiming at? To prove some sort of buddhist supremacy?
lol, of course not.

>>42025797
The budha avatar of Vishnu appeared four thousand years ago, not 600 bc
But yeah, sidhartha gautama did fulfill the decrying of the Veda

>>42025867
You're so insulting, tsk tsk

>>42025881
Note my wording. I asked for your wisdom. I know you have it. But you'd rather throw insults than educate people.

>>42025884
Yes, goading has been very effective this thread.
Which question did I not answer?

>>42025906
What is Buddhist monism? And are you explicitly saying that some Buddhist teaching(s) made their way into advaita vedanta, and if so, which ones?

>>42025935
>What is Buddhist monism?
That all things are relational and ultimately empty.
>made their way
What do you mean by made their way?
I said the region had mostly rejected the validity of the Vedas, and Adi brought them back by appealing to the current understanding.

>>42025959
Okay I'm wondering if what you mean is that the common Buddhist understanding was appealed to when advaita made headways in those regions?

On the other point, are you suggesting emptiness is the Monad (in Buddhism)?

>>42025970
>the common Buddhist understanding was appealed to when advaita made headways in those regions?
Yes, thought not in a sychophantic way. It wasnt "hey Buddhists, you are right and the Vedas say so." It was "Buddhists say the Vedas are wrong for these facts/musings/conclusions, but the Vedas agree with those, and the Buddhist arguments are still refuted."
>are you suggesting emptiness is the Monad (in Buddhism)?
I dont think any Buddhist would agree with that conceptualization, and would try to remove the very notion of singleness as well, but yes.

>>42026029
Oh I thought you were saying "Buddhist monism" was appealed to and adopted by advaita vedanta. Are you sure it's not this strong claim you're making?

I'll just ask Gemini. Meditate on that

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tnkhBjePAxQ
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/VcALULd-TxU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0kkFh0orDg

>>42026079
Ok the AI (very sad) says Buddhist non-dualism was assimilated into Vedanta conception of a non-dual Brahman. I think your error was to gloss the Buddhist influence as "monist" due to your conception of Brahman as One. But the actual influence was from Buddhist arguments of non-dualism and not-that. Thanks anyway. Please learn to teach. It's very rare anyone says anything that can influence me, but you failed to teach, and I think that's the whole point, I had to ask Grok.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TouvpYAGkcE

>>42026037
>Buddhist monism" was appealed to and adopted by advaita vedanta.
Yes. Advaita used monism as an end run around Buddhist arguments to defeat them and reestablish the Vedas.
>>42026114
>your conception of Brahman as One
What, exactly, do you think my conception is?
Because this is a very limited and ineffective understanding of Brahman.
>Buddhist arguments of non-dualism
So...monism.
Oh you are OP and get autistic on your version of annotations.
That makes everything align.
>It's very rare anyone says anything that can influence me
Yes, as I said goading you has been incredibly effective.
Though it always seems to end up with you having to agree with me.
You can go.back to spamming your pics I til I need to explain it some more.

>>41998444

If you follow Abrahamic faiths, I have bad news for you.

File: Screenshot_20260226_154420_Samsung Notes.jpg (1.6 MB)

1.6 MB JPG

>>41999355

File: Screenshot_20260226_154859_Gallery.jpg (666.4 KB)

666.4 KB JPG

For me 2026 be like...

File: shree_madhwacharya.jpg (86.4 KB)

86.4 KB JPG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAX2jUh9abI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWASN_z6UvQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n2vW635gMQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3OVBOOGLWo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3GaO1seduw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB6WxVySHQg

>>41996652
It's good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHIg_I9lEjg

File: Abhinavagupta.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

Is Abhinavagupta too non-dual/monist for you Dvaita Vedanta nerds?
I personally dont like advaita vedanta or any form of vedanta school (besides Avadhuta Gita/Avadhuta sect).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7EZKfia-PE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgqGjsZvP0k

>>42010218
>an indian pretends he is an ancient roman thread no. 173615

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3fIuDzQ82w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLBzY6E-vLs

File: Rumi.jpg (43.3 KB)

43.3 KB JPG

The good thing about dvaita and advaita is that both, in their most profound teachings, understand that the Absolute is beyond duality and non-duality.

I go with advaita because of the natural course of my practices, it starts rather difficult, but with time and practice, we start to abide in the eternal Now.

>>41996652
My thoughts are that dvaita vedanta sounds like in agava davida.

>>41996701
This doesn't look like happiness. It looks like stillness.

https://ivsjournal.com/index.php/files/issue/view/28
https://ivsjournal.com/index.php/files/issue/view/38

>>41996701
unvedic, medieval practices

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBksgOQUiZg

>>42039412
>food, song, speaking to a group, and deities arent vedic
Just say you hate the group. Dont make yourself sound like a retard trying to be mean.

>>41996652
Jeet thread, no white man has strong opinions on schools of Vedanta philosophy.

File: madhwa_shastra.jpg (65.9 KB)

65.9 KB JPG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDyYmfr1GbU

>>42039464
They don't drink forth the Soma juice and wage war. That's a prerequisite of the Vedas.

>>42039464
I don’t hate ISKCONnites. I just don’t see the point of treating late-medieval Purāṇas as authoritative or getting involved in bhakti practices. No personal god is going to save you, you know? Bhāgavata and the Harivaṃśa are late, sectarian texts, and even some of the bhakti portions of the Gītā were added later. It has nothing to do with the Vedas or the Upanishads, and it leads only to futher living in cope and illusion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bbF3G2h3Rg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOda9A2gqOI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29v-w-7uW5k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpJwOFDof_k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mzCe_XqJrE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwxxLcjdtH8