>>42029090
we know faggot, this is /x/

>>42029094
You are about to be presented “evidence” to the contrary. It will be so compelling most of you will abandon the idea of a flat earth and shun anyone still claiming it.

>>42029090
Your picture is clearly a sphere though

>everyone involved in aviation and sailing is involved in a conspiracy and no one ever blows the whistle because otherwise my book of fairy tales from thousands of years ago would be wrong about something
Biggest retards on earth.

>>42029210
Aviation works on the assumption of a flat earth anon

>>42029232
No it doesn't, you saw someone say that and chose to believe it because you want it to be true.

>>42029240
My posts work on the assumption of factual sources

>>42029090
I'll go ahead and ask the most important question then. The one flat earthers can never actually answer.

Who benefits from the globe conspiracy, and in what way?
For what purpose do they spend such gargantuan amounts of resources to keep the flat earth a secret? Why does it matter so much what shape people think the earth is?

>Inb4 to control the masses
They clearly don't need a globe model to do that, so why waste the extra time and effort.

>>42029314
Flat earth would prove god exists. Can’t have that.

>>42029250
pretty lazy and gullible to assume everything you read is true without knowing the bare minimum requirements for a pilots license

>>42029314
its a middle finger to the divine
you are surprised they are that petty? even after all that's happened?

File: IMG_2717.jpg (810.1 KB)

810.1 KB JPG

If there's a "religion for the masses" then the globe fits the description perfectly
People often say it's modern day Christianity that's the "religion of the masses", but the globe is way more contrived
So Jesus is a hoax for the brown and jewish hoards huh?
Well I don't blame them as much as I blame those who trivialize how we navigate the surface of earth. Those are the real retards and they're everywhere

>>42029348
>>42029369
What is more impressive? An infinite universe made by God or some retarded floating landmass? You are the ones limiting god's creation with your retardation.

>>42029387
you are the one shifting goalposts, not I

>>42029348
>>42029369
It wouldn't though. From the very beginning if the earth were flat then science simply would have worked within that model instead. What really killed God was the theory of evolution anyway, which would have occurred regardless. Same if the earth were a cube or pyramid or any other shape. There's no logical reason to hide the shape of the earth, since the vast majority of people will just believe whatever they're told to in the first place.

>>42029090
The sun rises and sets behind the horizon…

>>42029386
>Invented Religion
supposedly there is this guy that died for all the women and children you raped and killed and if you believe in him all will be forgiven…

>>42029487
Tell me you don't know anything about christianity without telling me that.
Seriously anon, I'm not even a christian and I can tell this is a retarded take on it.

>>42029090
I believe it, but here's a question I have for you flat earth guys: Why are you so content to sit in a shitty little snow globe. You scoff at spinning balls in space, but who's to say spinning balls in an infinite cosmos don't exist outside of this place? Surely the creator of a grand opera of synchronously moving celestial bodies would be much more powerful than your little snowglobe tyrant.

>>42029397
he >>42029387 is right, and you have no answer for this. You're worshipping a snowglobic demiurge and ignoring god

>>42029541
Tell me you’ve never seen koine greek without telling me… your a low iQ Ronald McDonald… good luck out there.

File: Sight Reduction.png (383.8 KB)

383.8 KB PNG

>>42029386
>those who trivialize how we navigate the surface of earth.
Oh shit the faggot who doesn't understand tangent lines or angles is back!
Could you explain sight reduction tables which is a big part of celestial navigation? You must use spherical trigonometry in order to do successful celestial navigation but doing that by hand with pen and paper is a real pain in the ass and time consuming so navigators use tables in order to skip the hard math. The tables gives you the solution for the angles in a spherical triangle.

>>42029715
*you're

File: images - 2026-02-26T013532.885.jpg (25.4 KB)

25.4 KB JPG

Imagine being so genuinely stupid that you fall for the flat earth psyop. There's not a single observation that supports flat earth, there's not a single model that makes any sense or predicts phenomena with a flat earth, and there's endless evidence to the contrary available at all times. Flerfers just ignore it, and reference a handful of YouTube garbage made by the same 4 grifters.

Then again, I'm confident most flerfer posting is just lazy trolling.

File: images - 2026-02-26T145652.758.jpg (22.4 KB)

22.4 KB JPG

>>42029894

File: Energy.mp4 (2.5 MB)

2.5 MB MP4

>>42029894

>>42029090
>flat earth depicted using a cross section of a sphere
peak comedy tardanon

Look if you want to say that the spherical earth is just like an illusion due to our 3D perception and that its true nature is like some sort of super 12th-dimensional hyper toroid that extends through multiple spiritual planes or whatever, cool, I'm with you. You want to tell me that it's literally a 2D flat disc in the most literal physical sense and that the only thing preventing us from falling off the edge is some sort of mythical ice wall and I'm going to call you a retard, sorry.

>>42029783
We went over this already bot kike don't pretend like you forgot
You're not intelligent or equipped enough for this subject.
Celestial navigation doesn't use trigonometry. How the fuck would trigonometry let you "do celestial navigation successfully" when it simply doesn't use trigonometry. Please explain in detail in what step celestial navigation uses trigonometry and then becomes "successful". It's seems you're pulling shit out your lazy ass. You're just eating up shit from whatever random sources you can find. Everyone reading this shit can tell.
The nautical tables that navigators use have nothing to do with trigonometry. You're simply just an ass clown

>>42029783
>Furthermore, vector methods are proposed without using spherical trigonometry, in order to meet navigation needs. Finally, web mapping was used to display the results. The results show that the two methods that are proposed in this study had better accuracy, practical convenience, and faster computing speed than those which have been proposed by other studies. The two methods’ capability to avoid complicated manual calculations and chart work processes makes them highly suitable as an alternative to the use of global navigation satellite systems. These methods enable maritime school students to quickly understand the principles of celestial navigation through computing and graphical interfaces.
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/6/771

>The Sight Reduction Tables for Marine Navigation (Pub 229) is published in six Volumes, each of which contains two eight-degree zones of latitude with a one-degree overlap between Volumes. They are designed to facilitate the practice of celestial navigation at sea.

>The tables are primarily used with the Intercept method of sight reduction by entering arguments of latitude, declination, and Local Hour Angle and obtaining tabulated altitudes and azimuth angles. The tables are prepared and published by NGA on an as needed basis.

https://msi.nga.mil/Publications/SRTMar
Try to find here where it says the SRTs are used on a proposed sphere

File: 229_volume3.png (385.2 KB)

385.2 KB PNG

>>42030785
>The nautical tables that navigators use have nothing to do with trigonometry.
How are the values in this table calculated then? This is what a sight reduction table looks like.

>>42030907
Where in this chart are there numbers for length measurements. All I see is numbers 0-180 which would be the degrees of a celestial sphere cut in half into a celestial dome
Looks like you don't have trigonometry

>>42029386
are you retarded?

File: Screenshot_20260226-214328.png (1005.8 KB)

1005.8 KB PNG

>>42031287
Have you read this book?
It might help you understand.

>>42029090
that's an anatomical diagram of the skull, not a map of the earth

>>42031607
It's says here in paragraph 2: "THE LENGHTS OF THOSE LINES"
Celestial navigation doesn't measure lengths it measures angles.
I would like to know why you are shilling astronomy spherical trigonometry and what good it's serving you
Tri-angle. Angles don't work on curves surfaces

>>42029090
constantly trying to associate flat earth lies with the Creator is the spiting of the Creator.

Stop it. its evil.

>>42029090
Lets go one step above, the earth is... a simulation. it can be any shape it wants or needs to be. it will warp your perception of it to make it "real".

File: 1761158752849023.jpg (49.4 KB)

49.4 KB JPG

if flat earth were true

the sun would be visible from any country as long as you had a really good telescope and not disappear in the horizon lol

>>42033807
I dont understand how flat earthers dont see that putting all of Gods creation in a singular snow globe is a insult to the creator and its potential, its asinine

>>42029348
How do you figure? Please explain in your own words

>>42033954
because they aren't really Christians at all and as such only want to associate flat earth with other subjects as a way to discredit those subjects.

>>42029090
>sheol
Why would you start from the assumption that jews are correct about anything?
This is my biggest issue with flat earth in general. Like they assume the Jewish god created everything just like they were told, and everyone else is lying.
When the Jews are the most notorious liars in all of human history.

File: Spherical_Triangle_Laws.png (192.5 KB)

192.5 KB PNG

>>42031287
>Looks like you don't have trigonometry
The values in the table are calculated using the spherical law of cosines/sines.

Point 'A' in this diagram is the north pole.
Point 'C' is your assumed position (AP).
Point 'B' is the ground position (GP) of the star.

Angle 'alpha' is the local hour angle (LHA).
'b' is the angular distance between your AP and the pole which you derive from the latitude.
'c' is the angular distance between the GP and the pole which you derive from the declination (Dec) of the star.
Angle 'gamma' is the azimuth angle (Z) from the AP to the GP.
'a' is the angular distance between the AP and the GP and if you take the complementary angle of that you'll get the elevation angle (Hc) to the star from the AP.

It's all spherical trigonometry brother.

>>42029348
An advanced civilization could theoretically create flat erf. Checkmate jewhova.

>>42034411
The earth used to be flat but nobody could check. Once we moved away from God people started to look for things outside God to observe and the earth turned into a Sphere.

>>42034420
aliens are your god. worship the aliens as your creator.

>>42034201
Spherical triangle is an oxymoron.
I asked you what step in celestial navigation is spherical trigonometry taking place and you can't answer

I have been alive long enough to see the biggest well poisoning psy ops be astro turfed and normalized including flat earth.

Fyi: flat earth, reptilians, age of aquarius and sophia/gnosticism are all created and pushed by political groups.

File: Sight_Reduction_Law_of_Cosines.png (441.6 KB)

441.6 KB PNG

>>42035317
>I asked you what step in celestial navigation is spherical trigonometry taking place and you can't answer
I've already answered that question. The values in the sight reduction tables are derived from spherical trigonometry.

File: Spherical_Triangle_GeoGebra.png (119.2 KB)

119.2 KB PNG

>>42035442
And I get the same values in GeoGebra.

>>42035317
>Spherical triangle is an oxymoron.
It isn't but flat earth is one.

File: 514097461_1326543719191835_927004672193604256_n.jpg (38.7 KB)

38.7 KB JPG

>still no map

Explain lunar eclipses if the Earth is flat. Hard mode: try and make a scale model (cast some round shadows from multiple directions with a flashlight and some discs). This kills the flat Earth believer.

We owe flat earthers an apology

>>42037468
We're sorry we didn't realize the extent of your mental retardation.

>>42033587
Try reading that again, you missed...pretty much everything it says. Including an explicit answer to your dumb question.

>>42035317
I gave you an entire book to read on it.
Educate yourself.
>>42031607

>>42033946
it goes under the firmament. time zones dont work the way you think

>>42029386
>see star
>pick it as point 1
>see horizon
>pick point 2 along it directly below star
>measure visual angle between two points
>no flat baseline needed
>this confuses and enrages the flerfoid

>>42031128
What exact laws of physics cause the rays to diverge non-linearly like that? What does observer-dependent mean and what exact laws of physics cause it to function that way? Are you able to build a model that explains this while not being incompatible with any other observed phenomena?

>>42037630
It's a joke post.

>>42037659
That makes sense. Though you can naver know with flerfers.

>>42037691
The most retarded ones will of course take it seriously. There's really no point in arguing with such people so you should instead feed them misinformation to see how much bullshit they are willing to swallow for your own amusement.

>>42037468
im sorry that they fell for a stupid lie. im sorry they got so psyoped that they went on to post it constantly all over the internet for years on end. im sorry for how stupid it makes them look.