Showing all 10 replies.
>>
>>
>>5130375
You know, I've been noticing more and more how much more macaque-like humans are than we are alike to any of the apes.
I think there's a conspiracy here. I think we're actually more closely related to the macaque than apes.
>>
>>
>>
>>5130375
this helps me refining my theory that humans were kept in cages and their genomes forcibly altered with monkey genes in pre-flood times
https://xenosarc.substack.com/p/conclusive-evidence-that-humans-were
>>
>>
File: 1744460601913699.jpg (8.6 KB)
>>5130388
>You know, I've been noticing more and more how much more macaque-like humans are than we are alike to any of the apes.
Back in the pity thread days, there used to be a webm of a baby macaque that was so traumatised that it just rocked back and forth in the fetal position. Out of all the webms posted in those threads that was the one which I saw unnerve anons the most with how human and childlike it was, which only goes to show with that cottage video industry the appeal is largely driven by the fact that macaques are as close to being child-like as you can get that is readily available for physical/emotional torture, something that the locals of those regions are not too bothered about as they consider macaques as local pests.
>>
>>
>>5131010
That's cool as hell and seeing this stuff makes me want this idea I've had for a while even more now.
I've been thinking of a fantasy game that, instead of the typical fantasy races, is populated by human subspecies at technological levels they never reached. Tech levels around maybe early bronze age. These bipedal baboons(they're more closely related to baboons than macaques) would be an excellent wildman tribal danger in the wilderness for Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals.