>>24467451 Believe it or not these women are TERRIFIED. Even dudes are anxious about this and that, these women are terrified of kids and men and when it comes to chad it's ok cause chad is fine with abandonment so they can go back living in their own minds where it's safe.
>>24467451 I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately and it feels like there’s something in the air of a divine nature. In every land, with every people of every race and culture women have turned completely insane and gone against their nature so readily. I talked about this in another thread recently, but how can you equate what the Jews are doing here to North Korea where they are experiencing the exact same problems? It doesn’t make sense unless something far beyond propaganda has been done to women.
Is it spiritual? Is it a chemical attack? Biological?
It has to be something of a far grander nature than mere words and rhetoric because those things could not and do not carry over the entire world. Something seriously wrong has happened to them as a collective.
>>24467460 >he doesn’t know about the ancient Roman and Chinese and Germanic women poisoning their husbands and murdering each others sons Women have always hated men buddy. Where have you been.
The mass of single childless cat ladies is going to cause a massive problem with society-wide ramifications. The beginnings are already starting to happen, with millennial women reaching middle-age and the older cohort officially reaching the point of no longer biologically having the ability to produce children. The course was set in stone a decade ago when many of them refused to have kids back then, but they could still delude themselves into thinking "one day". That can work when you're 30 and single, but not when you're 40+ and single. Now they're all having to come to terms with their fate.
It's already starting to have effects. Look at how there's become this big stigma over "age gap relationships" now, when throughout history this was totally normal. And the stigma is only ever about dating younger women. They never show any issue with women dating younger men. Or even old men in their 50s dating women in their 30s. It's specifically about men who are dating women in their 20s. Obviously the whole thing is about millennial women in their 30s screeching and panicking that they're getting passed over.
And that is a mild effect of this whole situation. It's going to get way worse in the future. The giant number of childless old spinsters is probably going to collapse society at some point.
>>24467461 Antinatalism was something reserved for the insane not too long ago. But the self harm, misandry, promotion of and aggrandisement of mental illnesses, whoring, obsession with material goods. I could go on and on. Women have turned a corner at some point close to the millenium and instead of turning back have decided collectively to indulge the depths of the abyss.
>>24467462 Since when was this a common theme and not something so outlandish that there is a record of every observance of it happening as a historical event in criminology? Women today are not well.
Women do what the "culture" of a given place expects them to do, if you lose control of that culture it doesnt matter if it's anti natalism or eating literal shit, they will do it.
North Korea is 99,9% ethnically homogeneous, they might lose half their population and still be fine. That's the bit you guys seem to forget about whenever mentioning Korea or Japan.
>>24467470 That isn’t the question. Tell me what similarity is there between California and North Korea to make the women in both places behave the same way.
My point is this, stop thinking about North Korea, and get back your culture. The moment antinatalists and in general women without kids become outcasts as in the past, the problem will fix itself.
>>24467474 It's feminism. >Is North Korea as feminist as California? Yes. Most asian counties had communist revolutions which state total gender equality as main goal. North Korea itself will be ruled by a woman soon too. Women only reproduce with men that are higher in terms of social hierarchy, a feminist society won't have kids because women refuse to reproduce with low status men.
>>24467460 We know a tree by it's fruits. If this is what you observe in women, then perhaps it is best to say that what we observe is what is in women's nature.
>>24467460 Yes It's the loosh farm and all that crap etc etc We are in end game basically War for consciousness and reality about to enter final stages
>>24467463 Truth is we are going through a demographic bottleneck right now. Most people, men and women, will not make it through and die childless. That's what it is.
>>24467459 Cats (big cats included) are amazing creatures. They always go for the jugular, regardless of the animal: they just know where it is. I've seen my cat hunt down rabbits bigger than him. Pretty cool stuff.
>>24467484 I will order my e-wallmarts groceries, and you, trannyroom fatty will pick my goodies and ship them via international route overseas like a good lil wagie you are. With 0$ tip of course.
>>24467460 I think it’s more subtle. It’s when women first see or even hear of another way of living. You know how in the Bible, all satan had to do to eve was suggest to her a vague comment about how the fruit makes things better?
North Korean women don’t have to see instagram. They dont even have to see an american movie. They only have to HEAR, from another woman, about it being better.
This is actually a major reason why women get divorced. They’re friends TELL them how much better it is!
>>24467464 >Antinatalism was something reserved for the insane not too long ago. Retard-chan, Adam Smith was already writing about rich women being barren three centuries ago. Now societies all over the planet are overall rich and bored, which curbstomps natality. Quite an achievement, really